Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AF, Skyteam And DTW, EWR, IAH  
User currently offlineYULWinterSkies From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2178 posts, RR: 5
Posted (8 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 3164 times:

With the recent expansion of Skyteam in the USA, I was wondering about possible development of code-shares among AF and NW and CO. In other words, will the routes to DTW, EWR, IAH be growing in the future for this reason?

Any info?

Thanks!


When I doubt... go running!
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHjulicher From Liechtenstein, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 19 hours ago) and read 3090 times:

I read long ago that NW wanted codeshare TATL agreements with AF, and possibly AZ, and CZ (Czech Airlines). Unfortunately, that would be that NW, DL, KL, and AF would all be code-share partners and I remember hearing that American contested it because it would cause a monoply on the TATL market. So, it's still under consideration, but very unlikely...

YOu can probably do a search somewhere, I think I read an article in the Free Press. Anyways, I'm too lazy at the moment, but maybe later.

I would be for Skyteam expansion.... At least, Skyteam hubs would get more TATL flights to cities like Prague, Milan, Rome (for NW atleast).



LH 442
User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4502 posts, RR: 72
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 19 hours ago) and read 3086 times:

The same question could be asked for KLM and transatlantic routes from AMS. KLM's transatlantic codeshare partner is NW and so far there are apparently no plans for a CO-KL codeshare on AMS-IAH and AMS-EWR, or for a DL-KL codeshare on AMS-ATL, AMS-JFK and AMS-CVG.

It seems therefore that, at least for the time being both AF and KL are sticking to their dedicated transatlantic partners, DL and NW respectively. I would imagine that a more extensive transatlantic codeshare agreement (AF-KL-DL-NW-CO) would be subject to additional approval by regulatory bodies at both sides of the ocean.


User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 940 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 18 hours ago) and read 3046 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Right now, no US carrier serves PRG. I would expect that to change, whether it is CO out of EWR or DL out of JFK or ATL. DL currently codeshares OK's daily flight ex-JFK, but they would do better flying their own metal and codesharing THEIR flight to OK and the rest of SkyTeam.

User currently offlineCOfaninBOS From United States of America, joined May 2004, 287 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 18 hours ago) and read 2988 times:

AF and CO don't codeshare on IAH-CDG but that hasn't stopped the route from growing. AF went from a daily 777 to a daily 773. Now, AF is bumping weekly flights with a daily 777 and 5 times weekly 330. CO also has a daily 777.

KL has added a 737 bizjet on AMS-IAH in addition to their daily 74M. CO is adding frequencies this summer to the year round 764.


User currently offlineL410Turbolet From Czech Republic, joined May 2004, 5694 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 17 hours ago) and read 2933 times:

Quoting RobertS975 (Reply 3):
Right now, no US carrier serves PRG. I would expect that to change, whether it is CO out of EWR or DL out of JFK or ATL. DL currently codeshares OK's daily flight ex-JFK, but they would do better flying their own metal and codesharing THEIR flight to OK and the rest of SkyTeam.

Wouldn't it be a better idea to add a direct flight to PRG from NW's, CO's or DL's hub other than NYC???


User currently offlineYellowtail From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 6091 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 14 hours ago) and read 2779 times:

Quoting COfaninBOS (Reply 4):
KL has added a 737 bizjet on AMS-IAH in addition to their daily 74M. CO is adding frequencies this summer to the year round 764.

Incidentally....how is this service going loadwise......

My brothers flies KLM and Air France regularly from IAH and he says the Privtair plane is usually about 50% but the Biz class on the AF 777 are usually full to the brim.



When in doubt, hold on to your altitude. No-one has ever collided with the sky.
User currently offlineKL662 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 121 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 14 hours ago) and read 2727 times:

CO used to code share on AF flights, but I guess that stopped about the time DL and AF strengthened their relationship. Looks like the code shares started 6/19/1998 between CDG and EWR/IAH/MIA, according to a CO press release.

I flew on a couple in 1999: AF36 CDG-IAH as CO83, CO10 IAH-CDG as AF35, and CO11 CDG-IAH as AF34.  Cool


User currently offlineJano From Slovakia, joined Jan 2004, 827 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 11 hours ago) and read 2657 times:

Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 5):
Wouldn't it be a better idea to add a direct flight to PRG from NW's,

If would be nice if NW did so.

However, they do not have aircrafy for that now. Ad when all A330s get delivered I think they will expand more along MSP-CDG, DTW-MAD, DTW-FCO (normally seasonal, this year not operated).



The Widget Air Line :)
User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3167 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2488 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 2):
It seems therefore that, at least for the time being both AF and KL are sticking to their dedicated transatlantic partners, DL and NW respectively. I would imagine that a more extensive transatlantic codeshare agreement (AF-KL-DL-NW-CO) would be subject to additional approval by regulatory bodies at both sides of the ocean.

Indeed, for the moment they will stick to KL-NW and AF-DL. Last year, they did a request for a antritrust-immunity for AF-KL-DL-NW. Not for CO though, as CO is not that interested in codesharing between hubs, only beyond.


User currently offlineCgnnrw From Germany, joined May 2005, 1150 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2370 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 2):
It seems therefore that, at least for the time being both AF and KL are sticking to their dedicated transatlantic partners, DL and NW respectively. I would imagine that a more extensive transatlantic codeshare agreement (AF-KL-DL-NW-CO) would be subject to additional approval by regulatory bodies at both sides of the ocean.

This answered a questioned I had about DL in AMS. I wondered why DL didn't use AMS as another gateway to Europe with KL doing the feeding to/from places like Germany and Scandinavia.



A330 man.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DTW & IAH Spotters, BA 777 On Its Way posted Sun Dec 10 2006 14:15:58 by SpeedBird203
JetBlue In YWG And PHL-EWR posted Sun Sep 17 2006 05:27:25 by B6WNQX
MSP And DTW In The Event Of A NW/US Merger posted Tue Jul 18 2006 17:33:42 by Incitatus
Need Advice On AF B-Class: 340 V. 777, EWR V. JFK posted Tue Jul 11 2006 23:35:08 by NYCFlyer
CO83 DEL-EWR-IAH Question posted Fri Jul 7 2006 09:06:28 by Cha747
Continental To Use 777-200 On EWR-IAH Summer Route posted Thu May 18 2006 22:37:25 by ContinentalGuy
AF-KLM And The Andean Market: Good Results For 05. posted Tue May 16 2006 18:30:59 by 777jaah
Skyteam And Aeroflot posted Fri Apr 7 2006 09:44:09 by Hjulicher
AF Cargo And The "Pelican" posted Mon Apr 3 2006 05:26:35 by USADreamliner
AF 777 And Inflight Service posted Tue Feb 28 2006 15:34:02 by Ben330NWA