Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AF, Skyteam And DTW, EWR, IAH  
User currently offlineYULWinterSkies From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2176 posts, RR: 5
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 hour ago) and read 3141 times:

With the recent expansion of Skyteam in the USA, I was wondering about possible development of code-shares among AF and NW and CO. In other words, will the routes to DTW, EWR, IAH be growing in the future for this reason?

Any info?

Thanks!


When I doubt... go running!
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHjulicher From Liechtenstein, joined Feb 2005, 869 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months ago) and read 3067 times:

I read long ago that NW wanted codeshare TATL agreements with AF, and possibly AZ, and CZ (Czech Airlines). Unfortunately, that would be that NW, DL, KL, and AF would all be code-share partners and I remember hearing that American contested it because it would cause a monoply on the TATL market. So, it's still under consideration, but very unlikely...

YOu can probably do a search somewhere, I think I read an article in the Free Press. Anyways, I'm too lazy at the moment, but maybe later.

I would be for Skyteam expansion.... At least, Skyteam hubs would get more TATL flights to cities like Prague, Milan, Rome (for NW atleast).



LH 442
User currently offlineHB-IWC From Greece, joined Sep 2000, 4496 posts, RR: 72
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months ago) and read 3063 times:

The same question could be asked for KLM and transatlantic routes from AMS. KLM's transatlantic codeshare partner is NW and so far there are apparently no plans for a CO-KL codeshare on AMS-IAH and AMS-EWR, or for a DL-KL codeshare on AMS-ATL, AMS-JFK and AMS-CVG.

It seems therefore that, at least for the time being both AF and KL are sticking to their dedicated transatlantic partners, DL and NW respectively. I would imagine that a more extensive transatlantic codeshare agreement (AF-KL-DL-NW-CO) would be subject to additional approval by regulatory bodies at both sides of the ocean.


User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 937 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months ago) and read 3023 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Right now, no US carrier serves PRG. I would expect that to change, whether it is CO out of EWR or DL out of JFK or ATL. DL currently codeshares OK's daily flight ex-JFK, but they would do better flying their own metal and codesharing THEIR flight to OK and the rest of SkyTeam.

User currently offlineCOfaninBOS From United States of America, joined May 2004, 287 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2965 times:

AF and CO don't codeshare on IAH-CDG but that hasn't stopped the route from growing. AF went from a daily 777 to a daily 773. Now, AF is bumping weekly flights with a daily 777 and 5 times weekly 330. CO also has a daily 777.

KL has added a 737 bizjet on AMS-IAH in addition to their daily 74M. CO is adding frequencies this summer to the year round 764.


User currently offlineL410Turbolet From Czech Republic, joined May 2004, 5665 posts, RR: 20
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2910 times:

Quoting RobertS975 (Reply 3):
Right now, no US carrier serves PRG. I would expect that to change, whether it is CO out of EWR or DL out of JFK or ATL. DL currently codeshares OK's daily flight ex-JFK, but they would do better flying their own metal and codesharing THEIR flight to OK and the rest of SkyTeam.

Wouldn't it be a better idea to add a direct flight to PRG from NW's, CO's or DL's hub other than NYC???


User currently offlineYellowtail From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 6037 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2756 times:

Quoting COfaninBOS (Reply 4):
KL has added a 737 bizjet on AMS-IAH in addition to their daily 74M. CO is adding frequencies this summer to the year round 764.

Incidentally....how is this service going loadwise......

My brothers flies KLM and Air France regularly from IAH and he says the Privtair plane is usually about 50% but the Biz class on the AF 777 are usually full to the brim.



When in doubt, hold on to your altitude. No-one has ever collided with the sky.
User currently offlineKL662 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 121 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2704 times:

CO used to code share on AF flights, but I guess that stopped about the time DL and AF strengthened their relationship. Looks like the code shares started 6/19/1998 between CDG and EWR/IAH/MIA, according to a CO press release.

I flew on a couple in 1999: AF36 CDG-IAH as CO83, CO10 IAH-CDG as AF35, and CO11 CDG-IAH as AF34.  Cool


User currently offlineJano From Slovakia, joined Jan 2004, 827 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2634 times:

Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 5):
Wouldn't it be a better idea to add a direct flight to PRG from NW's,

If would be nice if NW did so.

However, they do not have aircrafy for that now. Ad when all A330s get delivered I think they will expand more along MSP-CDG, DTW-MAD, DTW-FCO (normally seasonal, this year not operated).



The Widget Air Line :)
User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3161 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2465 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 2):
It seems therefore that, at least for the time being both AF and KL are sticking to their dedicated transatlantic partners, DL and NW respectively. I would imagine that a more extensive transatlantic codeshare agreement (AF-KL-DL-NW-CO) would be subject to additional approval by regulatory bodies at both sides of the ocean.

Indeed, for the moment they will stick to KL-NW and AF-DL. Last year, they did a request for a antritrust-immunity for AF-KL-DL-NW. Not for CO though, as CO is not that interested in codesharing between hubs, only beyond.


User currently offlineCgnnrw From Germany, joined May 2005, 1139 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 2):
It seems therefore that, at least for the time being both AF and KL are sticking to their dedicated transatlantic partners, DL and NW respectively. I would imagine that a more extensive transatlantic codeshare agreement (AF-KL-DL-NW-CO) would be subject to additional approval by regulatory bodies at both sides of the ocean.

This answered a questioned I had about DL in AMS. I wondered why DL didn't use AMS as another gateway to Europe with KL doing the feeding to/from places like Germany and Scandinavia.



A330 man.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...