Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CI Aircraft Purchases Not Iminent.  
User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1620 times:

Despite earlier rumours that CI was going to purchase the 748, and the immidiate denial of CI thereafter, saying that both the A380 and 748 are in the race, CI now has shelved plans to renew their fleet.


http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxn...7&subject=companies&action=article


SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4702 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1558 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

you beat me to it, will suggest deletion of the thread I started,

any news though on their A340 replacement plans??

whats happening with their 744F damaged in production??? on another thread someone said it was written off, if so , how are Boeing going to meet their contractual requirements?? will other 744F customers get their planes bumped or will CI have to wait till there is a vacant production line slot - which another thread says has been all taken up by CX!


User currently offlineAA1818 From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Feb 2006, 3429 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

How was the plane damaged in production???

Cheers
AA1818



“The moment you doubt whether you can fly, you cease for ever to be able to do it.” J.M. Barrie (Peter Pan)
User currently offlineQantas744ER From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1286 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

Quoting AA1818 (Reply 2):
How was the plane damaged in production???

During a cabin pressure test, the cargo door blew on a certain part, the final report isnt out yet but luckely nobody war hurt.

1 day later Boeing did some tests on MH`s new B744F, registration 9M-MPR to check that nothing was wrong with that A/C because it was the plane build right after that CI with the Line number 1370 and the MH had ln 1371, but after doing a cabin pressure test etc. the plane was delivered. The damage on the CI 744F with registration. B-18722 was only on the cargo door, so replacement is not a problem, i think their just waiting for the exact causes to be sure till delivery accurs.

Cheers Leo



Happiness is V1 in Lagos
User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4702 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1552 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Qantas744ER (Reply 3):
The damage on the CI 744F with registration. B-18722 was only on the cargo door, so replacement is not a problem, i think their just waiting for the exact causes to be sure till delivery accurs.

I could have sworn there were reports that the cockpit area was also damaged
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/261731_boeing74704.html

[Edited 2006-05-29 22:47:02]

User currently offlineWorldXplorer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 381 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1526 times:

Interesting to read that their response to high fuel prices will be to cut service to JFK, IAH, and FCO. Those must not be money makers for them. IMO, JFK is a surprise. I notice that all three of those destinations are 1-stop flights. Does anyone know where they route thru? I wonder if just the tag-ons will be dropped or if the entire routing will be cut.

WorldXplorer


User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4702 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1505 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

JFK - ANC, probably too much competition from BR and other carriers connecting via other places like NRT, SEL
IAH - SEA, they actually increased TPE-SEA this summer so that segment is doing well, IIRC the TPE-SEA-IAH was up to 4/week, now its only 3x/week and with 2 additional flights TPE- SEA only. I think UAs flights to Vietnam has cut into their business significantly as originally there ws a large number of Vietnamese Americans going to Vietnam from IAH taking the CI flight and connecting in TPE.
FCO - BKK, this was once via AUH which they dropped a few years back but this spring they changed TPE-VIE to TPE-AUH-VIE, maybe they will go back to TPE-AUH-FCO, IIRC they cannot carry passengers BKK-FCO, only their BKK-AMS flight is allowed to pick up in Thailand (or they are allowed only a daily flight picking up and TPE-AMS is now daily)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aircraft Purchases Financing Difficulty posted Sat Nov 19 2005 02:08:59 by Lightsaber
NW & UA: Which Aircraft Types Not To Be Repainted? posted Tue Apr 20 2004 17:54:50 by 727LOVER
Star Or Oneworld Aircraft Purchases posted Tue Sep 2 2003 10:57:54 by PVD757
TAM Aircraft Did Not Arrive To BCN Today... Again posted Sun Aug 24 2003 14:39:46 by Turbulence
TAM Aircraft Did Not Arrive To BCN Today posted Sun Aug 3 2003 17:05:53 by Turbulence
U.S. Persers On Some Aircraft And Not Others? posted Sat Sep 14 2002 22:28:39 by Flyboy80
Qantas Selects Engines For New Aircraft Purchases posted Sat Feb 17 2001 05:38:27 by Anzett
Is The MD-90 A Good Aircraft Or Not? posted Tue Mar 14 2000 04:02:55 by Avro RJX
Aircraft Not Suited To Hot & High posted Sat Jul 29 2006 20:35:04 by Curious
Boeing 787: Great Aircraft, Not Game Changer V2 posted Mon Mar 20 2006 20:23:34 by LTU932