Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
HV And KL To Codeshare On TXL, BGY, NAP  
User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3164 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 2 months 15 hours ago) and read 3648 times:

Source: luchtvaartnieuws.nl

KLM will start a pilot of codesharing with it's low-cost/leisure carrier Transavia to BGY, NAP and TXL. Both companies aim to get transfer pax on these routes.

I think it's about time. It was a strange idea that when you want to book on KL let's say JFK-NAP, that you get an itinary JFK-AMS-MXP-NAP or JFK-AMS-CDG-NAP, whilst their own daughter flies AMS-NAP non-stop daily.

I think it's an interesting development. Who will build the slack into the schedule to secure connections? Will Transavia lose a part of their low-cost structure by this? On the other hand, they already had quite long (45 min) turnaround times, so that doesn't change too much.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4304 posts, RR: 36
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 12 hours ago) and read 3583 times:

I imagine they will hand for instance $5 vouchers to spend on board, otherwise you get service inconsistency compared to flights operated by KLM or KLC. Will it mean KLM will stop flying to TXL or MXP?


nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 12 hours ago) and read 3580 times:

KLM and Transavia have codeshared before haven't they?


Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3164 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 12 hours ago) and read 3571 times:

Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 1):
Will it mean KLM will stop flying to TXL or MXP?

Stopping MXP is highly unlikely, considering their intensive co-operation with Alitalia here. I also doubt they'll stop TXL, I see it more as an addition to the current KLM services.


User currently offlineSK601 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 976 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 10 hours ago) and read 3511 times:

Quoting Joost (Thread starter):
KLM will start a pilot of codesharing with it's low-cost/leisure carrier Transavia

Surprising! Just a few years ago KL/HV ended the codeshare agreement (codeshare was mainly on AGP/FNC/CMN/ALC) because HV wanted a simplified and cheaper handling (towards low-cost).

Quoting Joost (Thread starter):
Who will build the slack into the schedule to secure connections?

Minimum connecting time will probably the same as usual for AMS/KL and is 40 minutes for EUR-EUR flights and 50 minutes for EUR-ICA (intercontinental), ICA-EUR. If a passenger is arriving late on HV and has a MCT less than 40 or 50 min than the passenger will be rebooked by KL. KL is VERY strict in this, if your connecting time is 39 minutes in stead of 40, you will be refused at the gate! Although you arrive at the gate before departure time. It's ridiculous! Anyway if you miss the flight due to the MCT being too short KL needs to rebook you.

Quoting Joost (Thread starter):
they already had quite long (45 min) turnaround times, so that doesn't change too much.

I don't see a problem witth turnaround times, IMO that doesn't change when codesharing.

Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 1):
I imagine they will hand for instance $5 vouchers to spend on board, otherwise you get service inconsistency compared to flights operated by KLM or KLC.

This is common in many alliances/codeshare agreements. E.g. you book a return LHR-MAD-LHR. LHR-MAD = BA = full service; LHR-MAD = IB = pay for drinks/snacks.
If KL communicates clearly to the passengers that HV charges for beverages/snacks I don't see any problems. The only problem is KLM and COMMUNICATION, those 2 don't go together!
 silly 


User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3164 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 10 hours ago) and read 3505 times:

Quoting SK601 (Reply 4):
If KL communicates clearly to the passengers that HV charges for beverages/snacks I don't see any problems. The only problem is KLM and COMMUNICATION, those 2 don't go together!

For people booking at a travel agency, it's the travel agent's responsibility.

For poeple booking on klm.com, they will just have to add 1 line to the "this flight is operated by our partner Transavia. Food and drink is available in a buy-on-board program" box.

For people booking by telephone, indeed, they need to communicate  Smile

Quoting SK601 (Reply 4):

I don't see a problem witth turnaround times, IMO that doesn't change when codesharing.

A long turnaround time also means slack into the schedule. When you have to connect passengers, slack is more welcome than when you just fly point-to-point.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Japan And France To Work On Supersonic Aircraft posted Sun Jul 23 2006 15:34:10 by TWOne
WN To Codeshare On ATA's DFW Flights! posted Thu Dec 15 2005 21:30:52 by DeltaFFinDFW
Swiss To Codeshare On Qatar Airways DOH-ZRH-DOH posted Thu Sep 15 2005 19:42:08 by Swissgabe
Mexicana And JAL To Codeshare posted Fri Sep 9 2005 00:36:57 by Jopavon
Britain And India To Agree On More Flights! posted Tue Sep 6 2005 16:30:28 by Concorde001
CX To Codeshare On CA Flights HKG-PEK. When? posted Thu Aug 11 2005 11:38:43 by Dugway
QF And OzJet To Compete On Canberra Route posted Thu Mar 10 2005 03:30:25 by 777ER
HP And QF To Codeshare!? posted Fri Nov 5 2004 21:10:47 by Byrdluvs747
TA And IB To Codeshare posted Wed Aug 11 2004 18:58:01 by Ua865
AF/QF To Codeshare On Paris / Australia Routes posted Fri Jun 18 2004 13:45:23 by Skyteam10001