Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Easy: An AC Substitution. Hard: 20 Years Ago  
User currently offlineMyOthrCarsA777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 55 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3777 times:

I realize this is pretty obscure, and I won't be all that surprised if I get zero responses to this.

As a kid growing up near YQT in the 80's, I travelled pretty frequently to YYZ to visit family, and in the wintertime, driving was out of the question. I probably flew the YQT-YYZ-YQT route 3-4 times a year, and though I was fascinated by aviation even then, I can't remember what sort of equipment was used on the route. I would suspect it was DC-9s, 737s, and perhaps F28s - it certainly was all on narrowbody aircraft.

One Christmas, we went to fly to YYZ, and our aircraft was much larger than usual.. when we boarded, it was in a 2-3-2 configuration - a Boeing 767. Even today I'd be pretty pumped about my narrowbody being upgraded to a 767, and as a kid I was practically bouncing off the overhead bins about my first flight on a widebody. My mom was a travel agent at the time, and she said she'd do some digging to try to figure out why this happened - later, she told me that AC substituted the larger aircraft due to higher loads in the Christmas season.

My memory of this is really, really foggy, and it's possible that this is just some sort of childhood dream or something. The question: Did this really happen? I dug around as best I could and couldn't find anything supporting this. YQT has never, ever had regularly scheduled widebody service of any kind, and I would suspect that you could count on your fingers the number of times a widebody has ever visited YQT. Did AC ever have a practice of substituting widebodies on routes as minor as YQT-YYZ during peak-demand seasons?

Thanks for any insight into this.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineRyGuy From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 180 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3699 times:

It is 100% possible that if the demand is there and the aircraft can land at the airport which it most likely could cause thunder bay is quite large that it is possible.
Unfortionatly for me though I have never been on an Upgraded aircraft, actually only downgraded by Air Canada due to underloading on the YYZ-YUL-YYZ route.
Anyways to answer your question bluntly, Yes it is possible!

Hope I have helped at all,

From somewhere out there...
User currently offlineMyOthrCarsA777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3623 times:


Thanks. Actually, I've never even heard of any airline actually downgrading a route on a given day due to poor loads, so that's interesting to hear.

YQT, actually, is not all that large in terms of the runways. The longest runway (07/25) is only 6200 feet long. A fully-laden Boeing 767 needs 8,000 feet, or so, to take off I believe. But a YQT-YYZ flight needs probably a tenth (or less) of the maximum fuel capacity, so 6,200 feet would probably suffice.

User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 6062 posts, RR: 43
Reply 3, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3561 times:

Honestly ... I would be really surprised if a B767 ever flew into YQT unless it were on fire!

Looking in the books it shows that we may use YQT as a "Technical Alternate" only. That means that although the airport has the required runway and navaids, there is no ground support equipment, nor passenger handling capabilities. This being the case, we may only use YQT as an alternate for the B767 when there is minimal risk of it being required.

Therefore, without ground support equipment, I would be surprised were a B767 to visit YQT.

You have to wonder, how people got on or off the aircraft, as YQT did not get bridges until the early 1990's, and I can't imagine a set of stairs around YQT that would reach a B767. Also, how were bags taken on or off the aircraft as there would be no ground handling equipment capable of handling containerized cargo.

That's not to say it didn't happen, just that the logistics involved would make sending say two DC-9s instead would be easier. No pictures, boarding pass or safety card?

Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8656 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3533 times:

Perhaps you're thinking Thunder Bay to YYZ cos that was the route you usually flew. But aren't you fogetting the time you went out to Vancouver to visit the relatives out west? Or that time you flew from YYZ to YOW (the nation's capital!) on a school trip?

fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aeromexico 20 Years Ago posted Fri Sep 1 2006 07:34:05 by Greg3322
20 Years Ago This Week: IST-CDG-ANC posted Tue Jan 3 2006 20:07:17 by TK787
Exactly 20 Years Ago, JAL123 posted Thu Aug 11 2005 21:32:14 by HOONS90
20 Years Ago: DL FL 191 Crashed At DFW posted Tue Aug 2 2005 13:40:25 by SWALoveField
Fares Today Compared To 20 Years Ago... posted Thu Feb 3 2005 02:13:17 by Zrs70
Routes That Did Not Exist 20 Years Ago... posted Mon Jul 12 2004 06:10:09 by Lehpron
SAA 20 Years Ago posted Sun Feb 8 2004 06:48:28 by Dc863
What Airples Flew Into Your Airport 20 Years Ago? posted Fri May 9 2003 21:48:42 by Zrs70
'Lawn Chair Larry' 20 Years Ago posted Wed Jul 3 2002 16:35:52 by UALbrat
"All Four Engines Have Failed" 20 Years Ago Today posted Tue Jun 25 2002 13:05:25 by Britair