Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Starts Assembly Of The First 737-900ER  
User currently offlineOyKIE From Norway, joined Jan 2006, 2732 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 11855 times:

Quote:
SEATTLE, May 31, 2006 -- Boeing [NYSE: BA] today begins final assembly of the first 737-900ER (Extended Range), the newest member of the world's most successful single-aisle airplane family. The wings and landing gear shown here are being joined to the 737-900ER fuselage in the Boeing manufacturing facility in Renton, Wash. Last-stage assembly and interiors installation will begin once the airplane joins the moving assembly line. The 737 derivative incorporates an extra pair of exit doors, a flat aft-pressure bulkhead and other structural and aerodynamic changes that allow it to carry more passengers and fly farther than the 737-900. The twin-engine jet can carry up to 215 passengers and fly up to 3,200 nautical miles (5,900 km). The 737-900ER, destined for Indonesian-based launch customer Lion Air, will embark on a five-month flight test program later this year.



http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060531d_pr.html

I am eager to see how this 737 performs. Will it might be the best performing 737?

What Airlines will order this plane?

Is it out too late to gain a good place in the market? Allot of 757 are getting rather old.

[Edited 2006-05-31 23:24:46]


Dream no small dream; it lacks magic. Dream large, then go make that dream real - Donald Douglas
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJBLUA320 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3179 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 11776 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was thinking about how this ties in with the 757 production ending as well. I think this could be a great replacement for the 757 since many 757 operaters are also 737 operators-- fleet commonality could be greatly improved.

Good luck to Boeing on this one-- sounds like this plane can open a lot of new doors for airlines.

JBLU


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 11585 times:

Quoting JBLUA320 (Reply 1):
I think this could be a great replacement for the 757 since many 757 operaters are also 737 operators-- fleet commonality could be greatly improved.

Almost 90% of missions flown by the 752 can be flown by the 739ER, while the -900ER has much lower trip cost and simmilar revenue opportunity. That being said, I doubt many airlines (in North America at least) will begin fleet replacement with this new 737 derrivitive.


User currently offlineGrantcv From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 11486 times:

So why does Boeing choose to release a photograph of the 739ER in which the wing assembly overhead obscures the only visible difference between the 739ER and the 739? How do we know this is really a 739ER?

User currently offline11Bravo From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1718 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 11474 times:

Quoting Grantcv (Reply 3):
How do we know this is really a 739ER?

It's either a B739ER, or its the first B739 with winglets  Wink

I know what you mean though; it would have been nice to see the doors.



WhaleJets Rule!
User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 11474 times:

Quoting Grantcv (Reply 3):
How do we know this is really a 739ER?

 Yeah sure

What clued you off to it, the guys in the tin foil hats??  banghead 


User currently offlineGrantcv From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 11418 times:

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 4):
It's either a B739ER, or its the first B739 with winglets

Good point! I hadn't realized that the B739ER was coming with winglets. I see that they are optional.


User currently offlineLeftWing From Singapore, joined Mar 2006, 284 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 11277 times:

Launch airline Lion Air Indonesia

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 11191 times:

Quoting Grantcv (Reply 6):
I hadn't realized that the B739ER was coming with winglets. I see that they are optional.

On the 739ER, the winglets are standard feature. They are necessary for the field performance, range, and payload upgrades from the base 737-900, and therefore will not be considered "optional" hardware.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16862 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 11162 times:

CO still has 2 or 3 737-900s still on order, I think they should convert those plus add some additional orders for the 737-900ER, especially to replace 757-200s which have been put on International Routes.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineVivaGunners From Italy, joined Oct 2000, 364 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 10964 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 9):
CO still has 2 or 3 737-900s still on order, I think they should convert those plus add some additional orders for the 737-900ER, especially to replace 757-200s which have been put on International Routes.

Maybe you are right to some extent. But, as someone already pointed out in another thread, having just 2-3 739ERs would be a sort of scheduling problem if CO must put them on some specifical routes because of their better performances in comparison with standard 739s. As a result, no interchange with other 739s would be possible. As far as I can imagine that could be a problem for an airline as big as CO.



Any ideas for a signature?
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 10935 times:

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 4):
or its the first B739 with winglets

Is there even any 739's with winglets.

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 10904 times:

Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 11):
Is there even any 739's with winglets.

 checkmark 

So far, I haven't seen a single 739 with winglets in any picture.

Quoting VivaGunners (Reply 10):
as someone already pointed out in another thread, having just 2-3 739ERs would be a sort of scheduling problem if CO must put them on some specifical routes because of their better performances in comparison with standard 739s. As a result, no interchange with other 739s would be possible. As far as I can imagine that could be a problem for an airline as big as CO.

Which leads me to the question whether the 739-900ER will become the standard 739 model and the 737-900A. I read in another forum that the 739ER was supposed to become the standard 739 model sometime soon.

BTW, does anyone know when the 737-900ER will have its first flight?


User currently offlineOyKIE From Norway, joined Jan 2006, 2732 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 10893 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 9):
CO still has 2 or 3 737-900s still on order, I think they should convert those plus add some additional orders for the 737-900ER, especially to replace 757-200s which have been put on International Routes.

I agree with this possibility. CO already uses the 737-800 on transcontinental routes, and it should be possible for them to add come capacity with the 737-900ER. From my understanding there is no need for an extra F/A for safety.

Quoting VivaGunners (Reply 10):
Maybe you are right to some extent. But, as someone already pointed out in another thread, having just 2-3 739ERs would be a sort of scheduling problem if CO must put them on some specifical routes because of their better performances in comparison with standard 739s. As a result, no interchange with other 739s would be possible. As far as I can imagine that could be a problem for an airline as big as CO.

You bring out some good points here VivaGunners. But wouldn't a interchange between the 737-800 and 737-900ER make it usefull in CO fleet even in small numbers? I guess using a 737-900ER should not require more crew, so if there is need for a bigger capacity, they can interchange?

Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 11):
Is there even any 739's with winglets.

Tom.

Nope

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 2):
Almost 90% of missions flown by the 752 can be flown by the 739ER, while the -900ER has much lower trip cost and similar revenue opportunity. That being said, I doubt many airlines (in North America at least) will begin fleet replacement with this new 737 derivative.

I think you might be right about many airlines that would benefit from a replacement doesn't see how they can afford them. By the way, isn't the 757 with U.S majors some of the oldest 757 built?



Dream no small dream; it lacks magic. Dream large, then go make that dream real - Donald Douglas
User currently offlineAirbusA346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 10868 times:

Quoting OyKIE (Reply 13):
Nope

Why haven't any 739's got winglets.

Tom.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7062 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 10868 times:

Great looking airplane - too bad that it comes so late but most airlines here in Europe already have settled for the A321.
I would have loved to see the 737-900ER with AB. But since Boeing has turned their back on AB and they choose Airbus instead with the A321 about to arrive in a near future the chances for that are very slim.
I could see them with Hapagfly and other TUI airlines though.
Another option would be that KLM would order some. But still the 737-900 and 900ER will be a rare aircraft to see here. Too bad since this long stretched classic Boeing fuselage makes it look like one the best looking Boeing´s ever made the 707-320 or the 727-200.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 10853 times:

Quoting OyKIE (Thread starter):
Is it out too late to gain a good place in the market? Allot of 757 are getting rather old.

It's nothing more than a stop gap between the upcoming generational shift in this size aircraft. In terms of airfield performance for net range, it's crap vs. the 757.


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 10507 times:

Quoting OyKIE (Reply 13):
I think you might be right about many airlines that would benefit from a replacement doesn't see how they can afford them. By the way, isn't the 757 with U.S majors some of the oldest 757 built?

Depends on the airline. AA and UA didn't take delivery of 757 until 1989. CO first took the aircraft in 1994, and US in 1993. NW and DL have some of the oldest, as they took them in 1985 and 1984 respectivly. DL also took some of EA's fleet, which were some of the first off the line.

DL and NW have the oldest, but they are the least likely and least capable of replacing them at the moment, IMO.

Quoting Columba (Reply 15):
But since Boeing has turned their back on AB and they choose

Boeing "turned their back" because the terms AB wanted for their RFP didn't make tremendous sense for Boeing. Among other things, the almost immediate delivery slots needed to meet AB's demand would mean forfitting other (potentially more lucrative) needs.

This may have turned out for the best, because Airbus has almost completely sold-out the A320 line capacity, and now isn't in the strongest position to win new orders. Note than in 2006, Boeing is doing very well against the A320.


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4489 posts, RR: 21
Reply 18, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 9872 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 17):
DL also took some of EA's fleet, which were some of the first off the line.

Pretty sure that was actually US that took EA's first.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineCricket From India, joined Aug 2005, 2967 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 9615 times:

Sweet!
Well, thankfully we'll be getting some in India thanks to Spicejet sometime late in 2007! I've already had a few spins on the 737-95R's flown by Jet Airways, trust me, until you fly in them you really don't realise how long they are.



A300B2/B4/6R, A313, A319/320/321, A333, A343, A388, 737-2/3/4/7/8/9, 747-3/4, 772/2E/2L/3, E170/190, F70, CR2/7, 146-3,
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21515 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 9168 times:

Quoting OyKIE (Reply 13):
You bring out some good points here VivaGunners. But wouldn't a interchange between the 737-800 and 737-900ER make it usefull in CO fleet even in small numbers?

Well, I'm pretty sure he's referring to my comments in another thread, so thanks!  Wink

To answer your question... no, it would not be useful to the fleet in small numbers. CO would need a subfleet of up to 20 before it could be scheduled to be on specific routes every day.

Right now, they use the 739 on high density routes like MCO and IAH-LAX, for example, routes they also use the 753 on. The 752 and 738 fill the bill on EWR transcons. Theoretically, a 739ER would work on transcons, but I doubt they will take any. More 738s are more likely.

Quoting AirbusA346 (Reply 14):
Why haven't any 739's got winglets.

Not certified, IIRC. Winglets must be certified on specific aircraft models, not families, and there isn't a big enough installed base of 739 jets for it to make monetary sense. Same reason you won't see winglets on the 753 any time soon.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineSkyexramper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 8976 times:

Wonder who will be the first US carrier to acquire and send it over the pond.

User currently offlineBHXDTW From Eritrea, joined Feb 2005, 1090 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 8743 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 2):
Almost 90% of missions flown by the 752 can be flown by the 739ER, while the -900ER has much lower trip cost and simmilar revenue opportunity. That being said, I doubt many airlines (in North America at least) will begin fleet replacement with this new 737 derrivitive.

Whats the 10pct that the 739ER cant fly ??

Can the 737-900ER get accross the pond ?? full of pax n fuel ??

If so Im guessing Continental flying EWR-SOU/NQY/EMA/ABZ by 2012 hahahaha  Wink


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7062 posts, RR: 4
Reply 23, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 8743 times:

Quoting Skyexramper (Reply 21):
Wonder who will be the first US carrier to acquire and send it over the pond.

Southwest offering low fare flights to Ireland and UK  Wink



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineGrantcv From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 8529 times:

Quoting Columba (Reply 23):
Southwest offering low fare flights to Ireland and UK

I can't wait. I wonder if that will be a double peanuts flights. Yum!


25 Post contains images OyKIE : Hehe. Your welcome This sounds like what they might end up doing, but the 739ER would look nice in CO livery with their winglets compared to the also
26 Beaucaire : Well the -900 series could handle just JFK or BOS to DUB or Shannon.... Add another 600 Miles range and you have a perfect 757-200 replacement...
27 DAYflyer : Then there must be significant overseas sales opportunities or else why build it? What is the range of this airplane? Can it be used to cross the pon
28 OyKIE : I agree this would have been the optimal solution, but that would probably meant a larger wing to accommodate more fuel and perhaps bigger engines. O
29 Ikramerica : You are right. This plane is tailor made for Asian secondary markets. 200 1 class pax on routes of 2500nm (real length) or less would suit many Asian
30 OyKIE : Which makes me wonder why Japan Airlines hasn't converted some of their 738 on order to 739ER. It was stated in their order that they could convert t
31 Jaysit : 215 passengers squeezed inside a 739? This is an aircraft that is nearly 20 feet shorter than a 757-200, in which 215 pax could barely fit (except on
32 Ha763 : At US, N600AU-609AU were the ex-EA ones. DL never had any since all their 757s are PW powered and EA had RRs. HP also got some of EA's 757s. N907AW,
33 DfwRevolution : Because its a very low cost derrivitive. Short of new the pressure bulkhead, nearly all of the structure is derrived from other 737 models. The -900E
34 Acelanzarote : Who has ordered the 737-900ER so far? Be interesting to see if any charter operators start using it... Good luck to Boeing, will give the A321 a run n
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Picture Of The First 737-800 With Blended Wings posted Tue Oct 24 2000 03:26:24 by Ericmetallica
First 737-900ER For Lion AIr posted Sat Sep 23 2006 03:30:17 by W3ndytj4n
Randy: 1st Flight Of 747-LCF, 737-900ER posted Thu Sep 14 2006 16:28:31 by Revelation
Boeing 744LCF Out Of The Hangar -- Photos posted Wed Aug 16 2006 07:22:02 by Brenintw
Project XM At AC... Status Of The First 763? posted Thu Aug 3 2006 05:00:09 by SafeFlyer
AMC Airlines Of Egypt - First 737-800 (pic) posted Wed Mar 15 2006 11:36:41 by B742
Boeing Announced Launch Of The 747 Adv. In Le Bourget posted Tue Jun 14 2005 10:24:15 by Columba
Airliners.net Exclusive - The First 737-800 For AS posted Sat Jan 29 2005 08:24:52 by Clickhappy
Identity Of The First Two A321s CSA posted Sun Jan 16 2005 14:42:40 by FCKC
Boeing: What's Left Of The Freighter Business? posted Wed Sep 15 2004 18:16:56 by A380900
BA First: You're One Of The First To Know.... posted Tue Jan 26 2010 10:56:36 by SirThomas
Boeing 747 Cabins Of The 1970s posted Thu Nov 26 2009 07:16:36 by Flywrite
Flightblogger: ANA Taking Most Of The First 787... posted Thu Apr 2 2009 21:35:41 by Aircellist
Assembly Of The Last 747-400 posted Wed Jul 23 2008 08:29:54 by Icareflies
Any Pics Of The First AA Flight ORD-DME? posted Sat Jun 7 2008 08:39:21 by Pylon101