Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
People Who Live Around Airports And Complain  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3493 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 6588 times:

I notice that since the late 60's people will move near a airport and then complain about the noise. I do not get people like that, why are going to move near airport if you can not take the noise. Because of people like this, the Concorde did not have regular service to LAX. It because of people like this the 747 do not sound as robust as they use to. It because of people like this that there no new SST flying today. Even here in Va they are talking about closing down NAS Oceania because people who live near the base, can not stand the noise. If you can not take airplane noise please do not move near airport, you are be a pain in us airplane lovers neck.

64 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6546 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
I notice that since the late 60's people will move near a airport and then complain about the noise. I do not get people like that, why are going to move near airport if you can not take the noise. Because of people like this, the Concorde did not have regular service to LAX. It because of people like this the 747 do not sound as robust as they use to. It because of people like this that there no new SST flying today. Even here in Va they are talking about closing down NAS Oceania because people who live near the base, can not stand the noise. If you can not take airplane noise please do not move near airport, you are be a pain in us airplane lovers neck.




I live close enough south of ATL that we get flights that fly over the house (usually EV ATRs). We'll also get some low flights whenever the weather is bad @ ATL (I've seen DL widebodies flying low enough that I could almost read the registration). I'm not bothered by it at all. When I lived out in Gwinnett County years ago, our house was right in the flight path of ATL and of Dobbins/NAS Atlanta. I was in heaven whenever a C-5 flew over.


These people bought these house for one reason, these houses are cheap due to their location. These folks make up the majority of the NIMBYs who have killed airport projects all over. What's odd is that you rarely read in the paper about anyone complaining about live near railroad tracks......


User currently offline777WT From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 875 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6546 times:

I agree. HPN was fine until this dumb developer built a community and houses right under the approach of runway 34.

The airport WAS built and used as a air national guard airport before. The developers built homes about less than 10 years ago and then when people moved in then b!tched and complain about the noises from the GA and coporate jets.
Now let me tell you this, look up the area of Purchase, NY. That's the area where the complaints are coming from. If you take a drive down there, they are easy over a million dollars houses in that area. Surely people weren't cheap when they brought those houses, the demand and cost of living is quite high here.

Then this stupid jock@$$ mayor Andrew Spano of the county HPN is located in, he sides with the people living in that area and goes ahead and imposes a curfew of no flights from 12am to 6am.

When I started training for my PPL, I had to sign a voluntary agreement that I won't fly between 12am and 6am at HPN.

There are coporate jets that had to break the curfew due to their clients needing the flights earlier than 6am and quite a few airlines such as American Eagle and US airways voliated the curfew also because they needed to depart no matter what in order to get the planes to the next airport for it's next flight at the begining of the day.

The county police even went out (I'm sure under the order of Andrew Spano) and tried to stop the travelers from entering the airport before 6am to discourage from breaking the curfew, hell they even brought in riot gear!
The police blocked the road entering the airport parking lot.
Guess what the travelers did? They parked on the side of the road and walked into the airport past the police and managed to get on the flights.

This police option didn't work because the FAA got a wind of it and argued with the airport over this issue. The result? HPN lost more than half of the Federal funding because to receive the Federal funding, the airport must remain open 24 hours.

I drove to the area where the most complaints came from and arrivals were using runway 34, the coporate jets were coming in low on final which looked like about 500 ft AGL there.
Now it puzzles me why the developer build a community of houses there where a Enviromental study could have taken the low flying aircraft into account?!

I say tell all these people to move out and let airport workers, pilots and mechanics live around the airport where they used to live  Wink

2 years ago I went on a fly-in with a group of private pilots at HPN to ABE for a steak dinner during sunset.
Then flew back with the group at midnight, the runway lights were off and had to be turned on by mic because HPN was "closed".
It was a clear night and 0kts wind at HPN that night. The group picked runway 34 just to go over these houses who complained about the noise and proceed to land in that direction! I was number 3 in line from the lead.

Now think of over ten 172's, two 182's, a King Air 350 and a TMB700 landing on runway 34 between 12am and 1am. It was fun 

[Edited 2006-06-01 02:56:41]

User currently offlineKaniksu From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 202 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6528 times:

This happens everywhere. Even here where I live a lot of nice houses are going up on the hill that faces the airport. I personally would love to live there and see the planes flying in but I know of people that complain. My friends live in a suburb of Tucson and they had to sign a waiver of some kind due to the noise from the military jets.

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6507 times:

Oh love this topic......Let's build a house over here honey, such a nice area, look at all those airplanes flying low and descending, must be an airport over here!!! Dumb as a rock if they don't like noise from airplanes.

IAH classic example as many others are! New runway north side of the airport is being looked at years back, all the T's cross and I's dotted by the city aviation dept. and yes, even the FAA as far as Environmental Impacts etc.....not a word from the surrouding communities. Then the Runway 8L/26R opens, a mere 5,000' north of Runway 8R/26L that is an original runway at the airport, all of a sudden bammmmmm, noise beyond control......do we see or hear noise is my question? Next, all the airplanes are for the most part new generation airplanes, not the B727, MD80, DC9's other than NW that is still flying them........the folks want noise then I say lets bring back triple simultaneous appoaches with those old aircraft, then they can complain about noise! Then there is SNA, and SEA, and I can go on and on but most of you know better than I.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offline747srule From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 429 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6498 times:

Why don't we just put all the deaf people in airport housing????


Jesus is the way,the truth,and the life
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 6479 times:

Quoting 747srule (Reply 5):
Why don't we just put all the deaf people in airport housing????

There's an idea



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 6450 times:

Let's face it, airports are attractive. The old adage "You build 'em they will come" has never been so true when it comes to airports.

Look at DFW. When originally built, it was in the middle of nowhere. Look at it now. Businesses and homes are all sprouting around it.

Same with LHR. All those idiots screaming they don't want any increase in traffic, runways, night flights etc. What they seem to forget, LHR is the engine that fuels their success!

Recently, The Town & Country Planning Assc. called for LHR to be replaced with.......guess what? .............homes!!


User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4941 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 6434 times:

Story of SAN's life, and why the future of SAN is in such doubt. The good ol' NIMBYs, who unfortunately have a lot of power because most are pretty affluent, have all but guaranteed that wherever the new airport will be, it will be bitterly fought.

They complain about house values, but they don't realize that the improved economy that comes with a fully functional, NON-stymied airport will over time increase the value of their property...

They complain about noise, but they don't realize that airliners follow soon-to-be even more stringent noise rules once Stage IV comes in force, which the military DOES NOT have to follow. It takes 7-8 787s to equal the sound/noise signature of a military aircraft like the F/A-18...

Need I go on? I hate stupid people, and I hate obstinate people who do not at least consider changing their views if they are proved logically/scientifically wrong. NIMBYs fit both those categories. The end.



Scotty doesn't know...
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9497 posts, RR: 52
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 6423 times:

I can sympathisize a bit with NIMBYs after spending 6 months living next to an airport used by the air national guard. At times the loud miltary jets were annoying. However it is something that you learn to live with.

GA traffic is no big deal to me. I personally would not live near a huge airport though.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4863 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 6384 times:

I live right next to Sydney Kingsford Smith International Airport & I personally am fed up with the residents complaining about 'THE NOISE'.... I receive noise from aircraft departing off runways 25, 16R, 34L & 34R & arrivals on runways 07 & 25 and you know what, it doesnt bother me at ALL...I love it!
Airports are behind the great success of citys such as FRA, AMS, CDG, LAX, SYD, LHR, HKG and up until now all we hear are the residents complaining about nothing else but 'THE NOISE' !!!
Live with it!!!




Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineLevent From France, joined Sep 2004, 1718 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 6295 times:

Maybe some people move into a home near an airport not only because it is cheaper, but also because they hope to get some sort of compensation?

Personally I would LOVE to live near a major airport!

Another extremely annoying thing is people complaining about medevac helicopters for example. I remember in Holland there was an issue with the helicopter used to get victims to the "Brandwondencentrum" (burns unit) in Beverwijk. The people living in the building next door complained about the chopper's noise and guess what? The helicopter flights were restricted! Can you believe it? I would like to see their reaction if a loved one had to be rushed there...


User currently offlineDesertAir From Mexico, joined Jan 2006, 1457 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 6216 times:

While looking for a place to live in Tucson I checked out a small neighborhood on the south side of town. I could hear loud jet noise and noticed that the F-16s from the Arizona National Air Guard turned right above on their landing patterns. Thank You...no!
Often folks buy houses next to schools and then complain that there are children around.


User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 6197 times:

It is the same here in Zurich. Specifically the people in the north of the airport bought cheap houses and are now complaining about the noise. The people in the south I can understand because this region was never overflown since the airport exists (it is very dense populated). The landings from the south are new because of these stupid German regulations which don't allow anymore enough landings from the north over German territory, which we had since 50 years.

User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4863 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6159 times:

ZRH

German regulations which don't allow anymore enough landings from the north over German territory, which we had since 50 years.


Why is that? You mind explaining this regulation? I remember watching a DVD onboard a Swiss International Airlines flight from Bangkok to Zurich and remember the pilot bringing up this very same regulation regarding aircraft not authorized to approach over German territory??? I can't work out these stupid regualtions "You can fly over our land but we can't fly over yours"!

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 15, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6137 times:

Quoting EK413 (Reply 14):
Why is that? You mind explaining this regulation?

The best, easiest, most efficient and safest way to handle the incoming traffic at ZRH is landing from north on the runways 14 and 16. This was done about 40 years. The flight paths go over German territory (about 14 miles before the runway you are over Switzerland, river Rhine). A few years ago the German villages north of the Swiss boarder complained in Berlin that there is too much noise and ZRH should not anymore be allowed to have landings from the north in early morning, evening and on Sundays. So Berlin decided to make such regulations. The landing procedures in Zurich became very difficult because they were forced to land at these times from south over a very densely populated region (more than 1 mi people). Actually in the north, in Germany and Switzerland there are not many people, no big cities and they are used to it since 40 years. I have been in the closest German village to the airport, Hohentengen, which is right under the path. The complain about the noise is ridiculous. The aircrafts are still quite high and not louder than a motorcycle on the street.
Important thing to add: the Germans complained that it would be not fair that they had the most noise of Zurich airport. This is absolutely against the facts. They have the landing noise (only till 14 miles before the r/w, where the planes are still quite high). But all the take-off noise, which is much louder, is in the west and south of the airport, completely over Swiss territory.

[Edited 2006-06-01 16:24:57]

[Edited 2006-06-01 16:26:10]

[Edited 2006-06-01 16:44:04]

User currently offlineTod From Denmark, joined Aug 2004, 1724 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6114 times:

The situation with SEA has been incredibly stupid. When planning for the third runway construction, the port defined the area where they would buy out existing homes. The city of Burien is on the west side of SEA and the city council strongly opposed the new runway. Just to screw with the Port of Seattle, Burien issued building permits for new homes, knowing that they were in the buy-out zone. The sole purpose was to cost SEA more money. To top it off, the city was continously took legal action against SEA. It was nice to see my city tax dollars beings spent on lawyers just so my county tax dollars that subsidize SEA could be spent on more lawyers to fight back. Just one of the reasons I sold my house in a great spotting location and moved out of town.

Tod


User currently offlineBBJII From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 850 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 6067 times:

What a Great thread:

When LCY was built, most residents complined that the noise would be horrendus:

Now the same poeple are saying the airport is quiter than the docks ever where. It's the people that have moved into the area that are now complaining.

Well folks, there airport was there before you, you chose to buy the house near the airport.

As said above, homes near airports are generally cheaper, because of the noise element.

But how many airports close for 24 hours at the weekend FOR the residents?

 wave 



Remember: The Bird Hit You, You Didn't Hit The Bird.....
User currently offlineNZ8800 From New Zealand, joined May 2006, 425 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 6030 times:

Quoting 777WT (Reply 2):
Now think of over ten 172's, two 182's, a King Air 350 and a TMB700 landing on runway 34 between 12am and 1am. It was fun

I love it!!! I think I would have accidentally done a missed approach and gone around again at full power at that... oops!!!

Quoting Scotron11 (Reply 7):
Same with LHR. All those idiots screaming they don't want any increase in traffic, runways, night flights etc. What they seem to forget, LHR is the engine that fuels their success!

Yes - London would be much the poorer without good old Heathrow - third busiest international airport in the world, and I think the most important in terms of connecting different continents/parts of the world.

Quoting Levent (Reply 11):
Maybe some people move into a home near an airport not only because it is cheaper, but also because they hope to get some sort of compensation?

I would not be in the least surprised. Some people are very greedy.

Quoting Levent (Reply 11):
The people living in the building next door complained about the chopper's noise and guess what? The helicopter flights were restricted! Can you believe it? I would like to see their reaction if a loved one had to be rushed there...

A hospital helicopter - they should be ashamed of themselves. Our one goes out quite often - being the only secondary hospital for 100 miles - or to rescue people on the mountain (Mount Egmont/Taranaki). It's noisy as hell, but its necessary and important.

Quoting ZRH (Reply 13):
It is the same here in Zurich. Specifically the people in the north of the airport bought cheap houses and are now complaining about the noise

Idiots! They knew there was an airport there.

Quoting Tod (Reply 16):
It was nice to see my city tax dollars beings spent on lawyers just so my county tax dollars that subsidize SEA could be spent on more lawyers to fight back

That is utterly crazy! Can see it happening though.

Quoting BBJII (Reply 17):
When LCY was built, most residents complined that the noise would be horrendus:

Now the same poeple are saying the airport is quiter than the docks ever where. It's the people that have moved into the area that are now complaining.

LCY has special conditions on the aeroplanes that can operate into it and special approach procedures - these people need to put up and shut up!
Ports can be very noisy though, we hear the noise of the cranes from Port Taranaki all night sometimes.

The exception is where houses were there BEFORE the airport was built, such as WLG; which also has special terrain limitations - therefore the noise abatement procedures are strict, and the curfew enforced rigorously - and in this case, good point.
AKL also has fairly strict noise abatement procedures, mostly for when banking to the north, over the city. Luckily, final approach to the west is over Manukau Harbour until touchdown, and mostly over the industrial zone of Wiri when coming in from the east. A Boeing 747 with gear and flaps down at 500ft making an infernal racket is quite a sight!



MDZWTA ~ Mobile Disaster Zone When Travelling Abroad
User currently offlineA380CGN From Germany, joined May 2006, 21 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 6021 times:

Quoting BBJII (Reply 17):
Well folks, there airport was there before you, you chose to buy the house near the airport.

Yeah, I also like this thread. It's just right to load off my anger about those people living near airports and complaining about noise.  banghead 
I live near the glidepath of 14L in CGN and I hear many of the airplanes twice: Once to the right of my house when they are coming in from south and then a minute or two later on the left hand side when they are finally approaching rwy 14L. And I don't mind the noise. We have UPS cargo-traffic all night long but I don't hear that anymore, I got used to the sound and I like to see the airplanes flying by my window. The best was when the An-224 flew over my house... I tell you, the china was shaking in the cupboard but I liked that experience and seeing the AN-224 right over my garden  goodvibes  Big grin . I guess some other people immediately grabbed their phones and complained...
So now they have so many complaints that it is unsure whether CGN may keep their permission for 24 h operation in a few years, and then UPS gets a big problem...  worried  but that's another thing.


User currently offlineStevenG From Netherlands, joined Oct 2005, 99 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 5952 times:

Only a few dozen of people living around AMS and RTM manage to produce hundreds of thousands complaints every year. Despite searching on google.com I couldn't find the exact numbers but if I remember correctly the number of complaints regarding noise at AMS is getting close to one million every year. Correct me if I am wrong. This pratice is going on at least since the mid-eighties. In the early seventies my parents moved to a town 20 kilometers from AMS (right under the approach path to rwy 06) and in those days hardly anyone complained about the noise. Be aware, those were the days when the 707's and DC8's ruled the skies. For those living close the newly constructed and already infamous Polderbaan (01L-18R) I think it's different, at least I can understand their feelings as it wasn't their choice to have the runway nearby. Those who live near the runways which are in use since 1967 should think twice before starting to complain.
But on the other hand, after talking about soccer complaining seems to be Holland's most favourite pastime.

Maybe the people living in the Rotterdam-area remember the story dating from 10 years ago when 12 people complained at the local environmental and health authorities about a plane leaving RTM bound for Turkey at noon. The authorities checked with the control tower or ATC-centre and it turned out that no plane had left at all that hour. Later it turned out that the complainers had checked the flight-schedules for that day on TV (the equivalent of CNN Text or BBC Ceefax) but in the schedules it wasn't mentioned yet that the flight had been delayed and hadn't even arrived yet from Turkey! For a while afterwards it was quiet around RTM. I mean the noise from those who were complaining.

Quoting Levent (Reply 11):
Another extremely annoying thing is people complaining about medevac helicopters for example. I remember in Holland there was an issue with the helicopter used to get victims to the "Brandwondencentrum" (burns unit) in Beverwijk. The people living in the building next door complained about the chopper's noise and guess what? The helicopter flights were restricted! Can you believe it? I would like to see their reaction if a loved one had to be rushed there...

Levent,

Things are some different here. In 1995-1996 I was working as a part-time lawyer for an environmental law organisation in Amsterdam and to some extent dealing with legal actions from people living very close to the heli-platform located on the roof of a hospital. Before I became involved your thoughts now were almost similar to mine back then. Those people were certainly not NIMBY's as they were living in the vicinity of rwy 06-27 and close to some major highways (the A10-south). At least it scared them off having the helicopter passing over their heads several times a day and it was loud indeed! We found out that both the hospital and the environmental care authorities didn't provide adequate or proper information about the noise which changed my points of view on the project quickly. However I switched jobs in that same period so I lost track about was going on, but the court in Holland dealing with environmental law related affairs decided in favour of the hospital. Only when it is dark, the helicopters are not allowed to fly out and in. Today hardly any complaints are heard as a new type of helicopter (with lower noise levels) is now in use.

I am not sure about the relation but a similar project in Rotterdam has been stationed at RTM and not in a populated area.

The purpose of using a helicopter however is mainly to bring medical staff (doctors or surgeons) to the scene of an accident as soon as possible and to execute those medical treatments which ambulance staffmembers are not allowed to do as their skills and training are on a different level. For example: anesthetics and providing certain medicins. As soon as the victim has been brought into a more stable condition, he or she will be transported by an ambulance to a hospital. Only very occassionally the helicopter is being used to bring a victim to a hospital, as it is very difficult if not impossible to perform medical treatments on a patient in a helicopter and as soon as the victim is in a more stable condition, the urge for speeding is not always that important. This can be confirmed by members of the trauma-team.

Concerning the burns unit, I think you are referring to the tragedy on the turn of the year 2001 when several teenagers died or were terribly injured in a fire in a bar in the town of Volendam, about 15 kilometers north of Amsterdam. There was some outrage afterwards that the helicopter could not be sent in because of 'those environmental rules to forbid the helicopter to fly after 7.00 pm'. This statement however lost its value as some nurses and doctors explained in the media that even if the helicopter was allowed to fly - it was just after midnight - it wouldn't have made a real difference. Furthermore safety issues are also involved due to landing a helicopter in a terrain when it's dark and where the pilot probably is not well known, increases the risks of more accidents.
This even applies abroad. For example my brother was involved in a serious accident with a snowmobile near Vancouver 5 years ago and at first instance a helicopter would transport him to a hospital. As darkness was about to set in, the helicopter could not fly out so he was transported in an ambulance. Fortunately he recovered quite fast and these days I hear him complaining more frequently about the fact that so far only one of his pictures has been published on a.net than about not being airlifted to the hospital.

Kind regards
Steven


User currently offlineAileron11 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 5927 times:

This is a good one, this lady lives very close to TEB and on the local news channel she was interviewed and said this
I lived here since 1985. With all the technology we have the jet engines are getting louder instead of quieter. I laughed when I heard that.



Jersey Lou
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2874 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 5921 times:

Here in NY there is FRG airport. Originally the production airport for the A10, it is now a GA and Corporate Airport. For safety reasons, FRG wanted to "reclaim" the displaced threashold on RWY19 so they could literally "shift" the runway north a few hundred feet and have a better buffer on both the north and south. The runway was not actually being extended, just shifted. The idiots around that area called their lawyers immediately to stop this from happening because they said "bigger planes can land". The funny part about it all is that if they would allow the extension of RWY1/19 and putting in an ILS on that runway, they could route all the large a/c in on that runway (which comes in over an industrial park and out over a lower income area that doesn't complain) instead of the RWY that brings them in and out over their houses!!! They just don't listen!!!  banghead 


"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlineScintx From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 270 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 5894 times:

As one another poster said that DFW was built in the middle of nothing, well its been several years, but they (DFW) finally settled with the NIMBY's and bought their houses and I assume bulldozed them? Here in modern America we have a victim complex and plenty of activist to support it. At the time this event took place in Irving I was shocked when they complained about the so called noise. Did you not go outside before you bought the place? Did not see planes landing or taking off? Did they have any clue as to the location of the airport? We need to create a DumbA$$ tax for idiots. I once heard a guy say "Give me your cause and I'll find the statistics to prove it". I'm sorry that I'm venting, but I am tired of the victim complex NIMBY's. I love nothing more than to wake up in the morning with the smell of jet fuel and the beautiful sound of a 727 on take off.


Attention All Planets of the Solar Federation....We have assumed control.....We have assumed control......
User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4028 posts, RR: 11
Reply 24, posted (8 years 1 month 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 5889 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
I notice that since the late 60's people will move near a airport and then complain about the noise. I do not get people like that, why are going to move near airport if you can not take the noise. Because of people like this, the Concorde did not have regular service to LAX. It because of people like this the 747 do not sound as robust as they use to. It because of people like this that there no new SST flying today. Even here in Va they are talking about closing down NAS Oceania because people who live near the base, can not stand the noise. If you can not take airplane noise please do not move near airport, you are be a pain in us airplane lovers neck.

Oh yes, a thread I can enjoy, and truly rant and rave at1 I live and work in Salt Lake City, my office is right underneath the approach path to SLC runway 34R-16L and it is fun to see all of those DL wide-bodies coming in during peak hours, or on mornings when a storm front is approaching seeing WN 737s headed out southbound to get into the departure pattern. Several years ago when the airport added the west runway (34L-16R), there were many in the West Valley city area who complained about the airport expansion and whined about; "Why the city and state didn't try and move the airport out into Tooele County even further west. I truly amazes me where NIMBY's can turn up. Those of you who are familiar with Salt Lake City know that the West Valley City area is a poor area full of "Trailer Court Trash," housing projects crawling with gang bangers and other politically incorrect stuff I'd rather not describe or risk getting into trouble with on this thread! banghead 
Salt Lake City has taken numerous planning steps to preserve a significant amount of open space inn and around SLC International for years. Most of the land to the south of the airport is zoned for Commercial or Industrial uses, yet there is always some loud mouth bent on making problems. It just gauls me that these people would think SLC could come up with enough money to think we could do as DEN did and relocate further out!  devil   dollarsign 



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
25 Post contains images PanAm747 : One of the smartest things ever done, in my opinion, was DEN's move to the new site. Despite cries from the ignorant that "it's too far out in the mid
26 Post contains images N751PR : Ok if I could join you? We could hit it up in the Walt Disney Concert Hall if the worst comes to worst.
27 Tod : They sell the houses in the SEA buy-out zone and there is an odd little cottage industry of house moving businesses. It created a strange place to vi
28 TurkishWings : And I keep thinking.. These people who complain complain and complain...Don't they ever fly?
29 Post contains links Boeing7E7 : Personally, I'm waiting for the FED to grow a pair and condemn any home in the 60 CNEL around airports, smash them and end any Curfews/Noise Restricti
30 Skymileman : Most people looking for a home with a view look for nice trees or a lake or something natural. When my family decided to build a house, the lot was de
31 Catflap : Personally, I'm fed up with the idiots who live in Ivory Control Towers and think that rules which apply to the rest of society don't apply to them. N
32 Skymileman : Wow, Catflap, how did you end up on a site like A.Net? In most cases, the airport was there first! In cases where it was not, it needs to be addressed
33 Post contains links DALNeighbor : It's one thing for residents to complain about noise after moving next to an airport, but I can top all of you. How about an airline that starts servi
34 Boeing7E7 : When you say "loopholes", do you mean "loopholes", like the ones city planners use to circumvent airport land use plans that would have kept people a
35 Skymileman : That would have surprised me until I found it was AA complaining about DAL. Thanks for the link. Very interesting.
36 Catflap : A number of people seem to be stuck in the mind-set of saying that "the airport was there first." Of course, this is patently absurb. Airports are bui
37 Skymileman : ummh, not quite. In most places, the airport is built quite a distance from the population it is intended to serve. The population then grows toward
38 Tod : In most countries, living near an airport is still voluntary behavior. Tod edit:spelling [Edited 2006-06-02 22:03:34][Edited 2006-06-02 22:04:09]
39 Scintx : Skymileman: You are most correct. Just go back and look at old photo's and they tell the story.
40 Post contains images DeltaGator : Not so voluntary if you had to sign it. It's not just airports. In Atlanta we have folks complaining about Chastain Park Ampitheatre. Never mind the
41 Scintx : I hear you, I use to live in SAN and had to stop talking on the phone when F/18 flew out of Miramar, what a beautiful noise. I miss those days
42 FRAspotter : LAS is the perfect example LAS is the perfect example
43 Galapagapop : mmmmmmm I know another city with lack of foresight just a little over 35 years ago. Now has some big problems, although it didn't necissarily deal wi
44 Post contains links OttoPylit : I disagree. I grew up living exactly 4 miles off the runway end at Jacksonville International Airport, which also based the Florida Air Guard. I grew
45 Scintx : OttoPylit that was very well stated. I could not have said that better myself. Welcome to my respected users list because you earned it.
46 ZRH : This is simply not true. Most airports were built fare from the cities with only a few villages. During the years people often bought cheap land near
47 D L X : These people should have to pay a special tax for their having the privilege of living next to an airport.
48 Post contains images EK413 : ZRH The best, easiest, most efficient and safest way to handle the incoming traffic at ZRH is landing from north on the runways 14 and 16. This was do
49 JohnJ : I was at Constitution Beach, Boston photographing BOS operations a couple of weeks ago. I've heard that local residents are sketchy about photogs, and
50 Scotron11 : Don't bite the hand that feeds you... FedEx employs about 30,000 people in the Memphis area. That statement sums it all up. Imagine the hue and cry i
51 Post contains images MikeTheActuary : There is, of course, a solution to complaining about the NIMBYs near airports. Airport/airplane/airline enthusiasts could buy the homes near airports
52 747400sp : Catflap How can somebody who is a member of aviation chat site and say what you just said. Most of us like loud thunderous plane. I would think anybod
53 Airbusa340 : It just goes to show - there are do-gooders around everywhere (CATFLAP). I wish they would all go and live on an Island somewhere far away and get a l
54 Ckfred : I listen to Roe Conn on WLS-AM in Chicago. In response to the suburbanites who are against ORD expansion, he has said that if a resident lived in his
55 Ckfred : A lot of road maps do show runways for major aiports. I have maps of both the Chicago metro area and the Atlanta metro area that show the runways for
56 J_Hallgren : Had the same problem here on Cape Cod with a tiny GA airport...the airport was here in the 50's and those who complained bought houses in the 80's-90'
57 Post contains images Tod : Good rule of thumb, but not always true. I've seen arrival and departure routes specificly designed to avoid expensive neighborhoods. Growing up as p
58 VV701 : Like most things in life there is a median path that the complainer must tread. The last thing that the protester wants is the closure of the airport
59 Threepoint : Sorry, but you two guys are part of the problem. While it may be 'fun' for neophyte pilots to deliberately attempt to piss of the locals below you, y
60 DeltaGator : You would be surprised. It doesn't happen often but it does happen. I have a large Tulip Poplar tree in my backyard that is about 80 feet tall and th
61 Post contains images Fixman88 : Bravo! I couldn't have said it better myself!
62 Post contains links and images KLM685 : After reading this post i made a deep thinking about the situation in MEX. I live in the city and the airport is almost an hour from my home. The airp
63 Post contains images QatarA340 : It depends where you live. I live two minutes from Doha Airport and the airport is busy all day and night. But, since most of the houses have aircondi
64 Tod : I don't have much use for NIMBYs either, but sorry that is a stupid thing to do. What do you gain by energizing your enemies? The more of them you pi
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question For People Who Live In Tourist Areas posted Sat Nov 22 2003 02:37:42 by Flairport
People Who Work At Airports posted Wed Jan 19 2000 00:53:06 by CaptPeter
To All The People Around Canada And YYZ...... posted Mon Jun 19 2000 04:19:13 by Slawko
The King Who Lost His Throne And Became A Pilot posted Fri Sep 22 2006 21:24:12 by Vio
AC Announces Layoffs At Airports And Call Centres posted Mon Sep 11 2006 06:17:01 by Radarbeam
Sleeping In Airports And Taking Bags To Gate posted Mon Jul 10 2006 08:24:16 by Londonlady71
Airports And Aircraft Types posted Thu Jul 6 2006 20:14:51 by 1337Delta764
Who Operates Mexican Airports? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 19:24:46 by RNOcommctr
Moving Aircraft Around Airports posted Fri Mar 10 2006 12:04:06 by OD-BWH
Who Flies Between BOS And TPA posted Wed Dec 21 2005 19:22:48 by JasYHZ