Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CX Order 2 More Boeing 773ER  
User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4211 posts, RR: 89
Posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3628 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

The first firm orders of the year for the 773ER are from CX taking their total to 18 firm

Cathay Pacific Airways today placed orders for two additional advanced wide-body Boeing 777-300ER aircraft, increasing its commitment to a total of 18 since the airline announced its biggest ever order for new aircraft in December last year.

Previously, the airline made commitments for 16 Boeing 777-300ER aircraft with purchase rights for 20 more. Two of these purchase rights have now been exercised. The additional two Boeing 777-300ER aircraft will be acquired through direct purchases from The Boeing Company.

All the Boeing 777-300ER aircraft will be powered by General Electric GE90-115B engines. The additional two Boeing 777-300ER aircraft will be delivered in January and September 2008, while the first Boeing 777-300ER aircraft is scheduled to enter service in September 2007.


http://www.cathaypacific.com/intl/ab...utcx/press/0,,31342-140214,00.html

[EDIT - Correct link]

Regards, PanAm_DC10

[Edited 2006-06-01 12:28:47]


Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVHVXB From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 5525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3573 times:

Will these B773ER eventually replace the A346 which CX have in their or do the intend to keep for some time? I mean 3 A346 seem pretty small for an airline like CX.

User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3527 times:

Sweet, might be just a small order, but still not bad.

User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3514 times:

Quoting VHVXB (Reply 1):
Will these B773ER eventually replace the A346 which CX have in their or do the intend to keep for some time? I mean 3 A346 seem pretty small for an airline like CX.

Not sure if these two will replace them exactly, but I'd say the chances of the 3 A346s remaining in the fleet when their lease is up is low....


User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4514 posts, RR: 72
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3309 times:

Quoting RJpieces (Reply 3):
Not sure if these two will replace them exactly, but I'd say the chances of the 3 A346s remaining in the fleet when their lease is up is low....

I'd say that will all depend on what the conditions for the extension of the lease will be. As I understand, Airbus has been offering such a good deal on these 3 airframes to CX that the airline had no other choice than to keep the aircraft in the fleet during the last lease extension. Now that CX is firmly going for the B77W, Airbus might not be interested in offering a continuation of the deal either.


User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6961 posts, RR: 63
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 4):
As I understand, Airbus has been offering such a good deal on these 3 airframes to CX that the airline had no other choice than to keep the aircraft in the fleet during the last lease extension. Now that CX is firmly going for the B77W, Airbus might not be interested in offering a continuation of the deal either.

I thought they were leased from ILFC and not Airbus?  confused 


User currently offlineVHVXB From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 5525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3276 times:

Quoting RJpieces (Reply 3):
Not sure if these two will replace them exactly, but I'd say the chances of the 3 A346s remaining in the fleet when their lease is up is low....

Are there reason why CX want replace their A346s. Poor performance or just the end of the lease??


User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3398 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3259 times:

Quoting VHVXB (Reply 6):
Are there reason why CX want replace their A346s. Poor performance or just the end of the lease??

People on A net don't like them?


Seriously though - the most likely reason is the maintenance, crew overhead of having such a small fleet of a particular model.


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3215 times:

That was quick.....follow on orders are always a very good sign; especially so quickly after the original order, and consider that the first 773ER will not be delivered for more than a year. It does seem that CX will be very committed to the 773ER and expect follow on orders: it will likely become the backbone of the CX longhaul fleet.

This confirms how important the CX order was to the 773ER program.

As for the three leased A346s in the CX fleet, everything seems to suggest that these aircraft will leave the CX fleet at the conclusion of their leases (does anyone know the terms of these lease?).......the 773ERs will replace these aircraft. The 773ER has become the leader in this class.....but also consider that CX probably ended up with the worst performing early build A346s built and truly do not represent the type; that being said, the A346s seem to handle the JFK-HKG route without too many issues on a daily basis.


User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4211 posts, RR: 89
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3199 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Quoting PM (Reply 5):
I thought they were leased from ILFC and not Airbus?

That is correct PM they are on lease from ILFC so Airbus is not really in a position be involved directly between ILFC and CX.

Regards, PanAm_DC10



Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4514 posts, RR: 72
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3152 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 5):
I thought they were leased from ILFC and not Airbus?

That's right, but still, CX is believed to enjoy such a great deal on those 3 airframes that it would have been almost criminal not to extend that lease agreement that last time around.


User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3131 times:

The other day someone on anet made the ridiculous statement that the 777 had no orders yet this year and it was going to be a dead airplane. So much for rediculous statements.

I seriously did not expect this airline to exercise options after only having placed this large order not that long ago. Good for them, I hope they grow well and strong.



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineVHVXB From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 5525 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3086 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 8):
but also consider that CX probably ended up with the worst performing early build A346s built and truly do not represent the type

Yes this is true they had overweight wings according to wikipedia.


User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4211 posts, RR: 89
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3086 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 10):
That's right, but still, CX is believed to enjoy such a great deal on those 3 airframes that it would have been almost criminal not to extend that lease agreement that last time around.

The original lease terms were for 5 years and CX took delivery in 2002 and 2003 of them so when did they have the chance to extend the lease agreement? That said IIRC early last year or late 2004 they signed a 5 year deal with RR to maintain the engines on the birds so they'll most likely stay around for awhile yet. If not, demand for widebodies is strong and ILFC may well have no problem placing them with a carrier elsewhere.

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi...6.RH7kU8Oa9dUAAEuoOZM&modele=jdc_1

Regards, PanAm_DC10



Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will We See US Airlines Order More Boeing? posted Mon Sep 17 2001 18:12:40 by DIA
Lion Air Order 30 More Boeing 737-900ER posted Mon Jul 17 2006 13:04:53 by PanAm_DC10
CX Orders 2 More 773ER posted Thu Jun 1 2006 19:39:31 by Navion
Boeing: 773ER 18% More Fuel Efficient Than A346 posted Wed Jul 24 2002 21:53:05 by DIA
Needs 8 More 747 Order - Says Boeing posted Mon Mar 25 2002 20:48:23 by Cruising
Qatar Airways Opts For 20 More Boeing 777s posted Tue Nov 7 2006 03:32:58 by BoeingBus
TAP To Order More A330s posted Tue Oct 31 2006 01:44:07 by PanAm_DC10
Aeroflot May Split Plane Order Between Boeing, Air posted Tue Sep 12 2006 15:27:40 by NYC777
AVolar From Mexico To Order 20 Boeing's! posted Mon Sep 11 2006 02:58:03 by Ghost77
Could Delta Order More 767-300ER Or 767-400ER? posted Tue Jun 27 2006 01:08:38 by 1337Delta764