Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue To Re-start EWR-TPA On 9/14  
User currently offlineFA4B6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2721 times:

http://www.nj.com/search/index.ssf?/...xml?starledger?b&coll=1&thispage=2

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetBlueAtJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1687 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2617 times:

Great news, proves many people wrong. I loved all of those B6 vs CO posts and that was the big excuse for CO fans. Though it is only one, at least they are bringing it back and I am sure it will grow back up to 2 by later this year to next year.

B6jfk airplane 



When You Know jetBlue, You Know Better
User currently offlineJetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2993 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

YES! I remember that battle here on a.net the day that B6 announced it was pulling EWR-TPA (for the summer), and everyone thought this was "proof" that B6 was doing badly at EWR and CO was "chasing them out". It looks like that's not the situation, but instead this market is seasonal and is big enough for two airlines to serve.

Anyway, it's nice to see that B6 is looking to make EWR work.

jetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21544 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2531 times:

Did you read the news blurb before posting, guys?

They sure as heck had pulled out of this route ENTIRELY (thus those of us who said they were pulling out were RIGHT), but have now decided to return ONE flight because they fear that they can't convince customers to drive to JFK to fly B6. In other words, they were going to fly CO instead.

So B6 will try again to pull pax from CO, but this time, with 1 flight a day. They will likely fill this plane, but whether they can do it profitably, who knows?

We'll see if it sticks. But it seems more like the once daily SYR-MCO flight at this point vs. establishing a strong foothold at EWR to give CO a run for it's money.

Calling this proof that EWR is going as planned for B6 is drinking blue juice. Hopefully this winter will be better and they will be able to really expand at EWR. But right now, they are flying fewer flights than they have in the past at the same time they are trying to establish a new focus airport...



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Freedomair To Re-start Melbourne posted Fri Apr 28 2006 10:50:31 by Planemanofnz
AI To Re-start Flights To BHX And YYZ posted Fri Feb 11 2005 22:12:09 by Airish
AEagle To Re-start LaGuardia To Traverse City posted Sun May 4 2003 01:07:33 by MAH4546
Alitalia To Re-start San Francisco Summer 2002! posted Tue Dec 18 2001 20:02:01 by 777-500ER
JetBlue To Re-instate 3 Of 4 Suspended Flights posted Tue Oct 23 2001 04:51:19 by MAH4546
APU Needed To Re-start An Inflight Eng Shutown? posted Thu May 31 2001 07:40:30 by Red Panda
JetBlue To Start MCO-BUR On June 30th... posted Mon Mar 6 2006 22:57:15 by JetBlueAtJFK
BLI-IWA Flights To Start In January On Western posted Thu Nov 16 2006 17:42:36 by FATFlyer
SilverJet To Start EWR-Luton 25 January 2007. posted Fri Nov 3 2006 09:06:20 by LACA773
Jetblue To Cutback On 190/320 Next 3 YRS posted Tue Oct 24 2006 13:51:36 by Lowecur