Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
WN Offers To Give Up Gates At Love  
User currently offlineBarney Captain From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1001 posts, RR: 12
Posted (8 years 7 months 4 hours ago) and read 3712 times:

Southwest offers to give up Love gates
American faults rival's tactics in bid to speed Wright repeal



12:00 AM CDT on Thursday, June 1, 2006
By SUZANNE MARTA and ROBERT DODGE / The Dallas Morning News


Southwest Airlines Co. would give up gates at Dallas Love Field if it would speed up a Wright repeal, chief executive Gary Kelly said Wednesday.

Mr. Kelly said the carrier has offered three proposals on what to do about the 26-year-old federal restrictions, while rival American Airlines Inc. has worked to preserve the status quo.

Southwest wants to serve its nationwide network from Love, its home airport.

Fort Worth-based American opposes any changes to the Wright law, which limits most commercial flights at Love to a nine-state perimeter.

Southwest pitched immediate through-ticketing, Mr. Kelly said, allowing passengers to fly from Love to any U.S. city on a single ticket if they first stop within a Wright state.

Southwest also has proposed a phased-in repeal of Wright stretching over several years, Mr. Kelly said, speaking at a North Dallas Chamber luncheon.

The mayors of Dallas and Fort Worth, who have been in talks to reach a local compromise on the Wright fight, have convened several meetings that Southwest has attended, Mr. Kelly said.

"American was asked to attend but declined," he said.

But Tim Wagner, a spokesman for American, said the world's largest carrier has been in "constant dialogue" with the mayors.

Mr. Kelly's assertions were "simply untrue," Mr. Wagner said.

"Southwest is simply trying to manipulate the process by spreading misinformation publicly."

Some participants in the Wright debate, including Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, have suggested cutting the number of gates at Love as a way to reduce the impact of opening the city airport to long-haul routes.

Mr. Kelly declined to discuss details about how many gates Southwest would be willing to part with.

He underscored the carrier's preference to maintain all 21 of its gates at Love.

"Understand that American has rights to 120 gates at D/FW, six times what Southwest has," Mr. Kelly said.


Mr. Kelly said the airline has also honored a request by Dallas and Fort Worth to "stand down" for 30 days while they tried to work out a local plan.

"We honored that request, and more," he said. "All the while, American-sponsored, pro-Wright ads raged in Dallas. As of last week, we have resurrected our campaign."


Efforts of cities

Mayor Laura Miller declined to respond to Mr. Kelly's comments. But she acknowledged Tuesday that the Dallas City Council is still on target for a June 14 Wright resolution – and to reveal its report on lifting flight restrictions at Love in the next two weeks.

"We are not going to make any comments about the negotiations except to say that Dallas and Fort Worth are making good progress," Ms. Miller said.

Fort Worth Mayor Mike Moncrief declined to comment on any of the specifics.

"Mayor Miller and I, and our cities, are continuing to try to move this ball down the field," he said. "I feel like we are making progress."

But he said that Fort Worth is not tied to Dallas' June 14 deadline.

The June 14 date "is not a priority for us," Mr. Moncrief said. "We will act when we feel like we have a product."

Reps. Jeb Hensarling, R-Dallas, and Sam Johnson, R-Plano, plan to announce today at a Love Field news conference that up to seven new co-sponsors are poised to sign on to their proposal to repeal Wright. In March, the two congressmen temporarily suspended efforts to recruit new co-sponsors.

But they set a deadline of June 1 to end their cease-fire, and plan to mark the day by announcing that they are redoubling efforts to win House approval.

Before today's announcement, the Wright repeal proposal had 46 co-sponsors.

The confirmed new co-sponsors are: Reps. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala.; Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md.; Bobby Jindal, R-La.; Hilda Solis, D-Calif.; and Brian Higgins, D-N.Y. Mr. Hensarling's staff was attempting to confirm two more co-sponsors Wednesday.

They also plan to release a letter signed by about 10 members of Congress to the mayors of Dallas and Fort Worth that responds to proposals that Love be closed.

"Love Field is a great asset that is not being fully utilized," the congressmen said in the letter, originally sent to the mayors on May 18. "Though some have suggested that closure of Love Field would best address the current tensions, we strongly disagree."

The proposal to close Love Field is similar to American's position that Southwest move its operations to D/FW, and was endorsed in April by the Business Travel Coalition.

It has appeared on aviation Internet blogs and was proposed again Tuesday by Rep. Joe Barton, R-Ennis, in an op-ed article in The Dallas Morning News.

In his op-ed article, Mr. Barton revealed that he and Rep. Kay Granger, R-Fort Worth, have formally requested that the General Accountability Office examine alternative uses of Love Field.

Karen Modlin, a spokeswoman for Mr. Barton, said they do not expect the GAO report for two to three months.


Possible savings?

The two North Texas Republicans also asked the GAO, the watchdog arm of Congress, to examine the savings that taxpayers might reap if Love Field were used for something other than an airport.

"In addition, this study should provide a determination on whether today's volume of commercial passenger flights at Love Field could be accommodated at D/FW International Airport," Mr. Barton and Ms. Granger said in their letter to the GAO.


Suzanne Marta reported from Dallas and Robert Dodge reported from Washington, D.C. Staff writer Emily Ramshaw also contributed to this report from Dallas.


...from the Banana Republic....
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineScintx From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 270 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 3 hours ago) and read 3650 times:

I just moved back to the DFW area after taking a 6 years to realize this was a good place to work and live. I was here from 1975-2000. I would have hoped by now this would have be put to rest. Love Field is here to stay with or without the Wright Admin. It seems to me there are several cities around the nation that have two or more airports. In Houston you have two and I don't see the problem there? Am I missing something? This is such a waste of time, money and effort on all parties. Love Field is here to stay now get over it. One other question that I have not heard raised before is the status of the old Legend Terminal? Why does AA not use it? If I'm correct wasn't there a parking garage with it too?


Attention All Planets of the Solar Federation....We have assumed control.....We have assumed control......
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21590 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 2 hours ago) and read 3535 times:

Quoting Scintx (Reply 1):
It seems to me there are several cities around the nation that have two or more airports. In Houston you have two and I don't see the problem there? Am I missing something?

Read the archives of these topics. All the pros and cons are spelled out pretty well (surrounded by a lot of name calling). You'll see some reasons why DAL/DFW is not the same as HOU/IAH, for example.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 2 hours ago) and read 3502 times:

If Southwest were willing to give up a significant number of gates (which could be restored by building more gates at DAL in the future) so that newcomers (such as F9, B6, and FL) could operate without significant limitations, I would change my mind about the Wright Amendment (although I think the DAL management would be foolish not to significantly increase fees since the value of the 'slots' would be higher).

Steve


User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 2 hours ago) and read 3494 times:

Quoting Barney Captain (Thread starter):
"Southwest is simply trying to manipulate the process by spreading misinformation publicly."

Pot: "Hello Kettle...you're black".


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue To Give Up 5 Slots At LGB/ 3 To AA/2 To AS posted Tue Feb 4 2003 16:44:03 by FATFlyer
Southwest To Have 29 Gates At MDW!?! posted Sun Nov 20 2005 23:51:37 by Timberwolf24
NW Pilots To Give Up More? posted Mon Aug 29 2005 16:44:36 by Isitsafenow
Air Gabon Forced To Give Up Long Haul Flights posted Sun Jun 12 2005 16:29:26 by Soups
AF To Give Up Nonstop Vietnam Flights posted Tue Dec 28 2004 14:18:42 by HB-IWC
US Airways Plans To Lease 10 Gates At PIT posted Tue Jan 6 2004 00:39:53 by Chi-town
WN Service To RIC Delayed Until At Least 2005 posted Wed Aug 27 2003 16:18:27 by LoneStarMike
Ryanair Announced To Give Up Buzz Base In BOH posted Tue Feb 4 2003 18:37:41 by Thomas_Jaeger
Why Is BA Not Willing To Give Up LHR Slots? posted Sun Jan 27 2002 02:26:42 by Jiml1126
Qantas Prepared To Give Up Sydney Slots posted Mon May 7 2001 10:53:43 by United Airline