Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BAe 146 Facts  
User currently offlinePlanebuff From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 35 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 4 months 23 hours ago) and read 4057 times:

Can anybody give me info on the BAe146?  Smile


Flown on CO, DL, UA, AA, LX, DL Connection by SkyWest, Song (DL).
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHS748 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 23 hours ago) and read 4049 times:

Your very own Airliners.net can! At the top of the page is a button that says 'A/C DATA'. Give it a click and you'll be amazed at all the facts you can get about the BAe 146.

User currently offlineMD90fan From Bahamas, joined Jul 2005, 2931 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 22 hours ago) and read 4023 times:

Quoting HS748 (Reply 1):
Your very own Airliners.net can! At the top of the page is a button that says 'A/C DATA'. Give it a click and you'll be amazed at all the facts you can get about the BAe 146.

Don't believe that section ever



http://www.devanwells.blogspot.com/
User currently offlineFlypdx From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 636 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 22 hours ago) and read 4008 times:

Quoting MD90fan (Reply 2):
Don't believe that section ever

Do you have anything to back up your statement with?


User currently offlineAeroVodochody From Czech Republic, joined Feb 2005, 540 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 21 hours ago) and read 3951 times:

Hey Planebuff  Smile

The BAe 146 is a four-engine high winged regional jet capable of carrying about 90-100 passengers. It has a range of about 2,000km and I believe it cruises at around 500 knots. Thanks to its high wing, large flaps and spoilers, and a really cool airbrake, it doesn't need thrust reversers upon landing and is capable of taking off and landing in a fairly short distance. The only real problem I see is that with 4 small engines instead of 2 larger ones, though they are remarkably quiet, it is a pain in the neck to maintain which is probably why it isn't a bit more popular among airlines. Also, I have heard from people that it can be quite cramped inside, but I can't confirm or deny it as I haven't flown one. BAE Systems has ceased production in 2002, 21 years after the Maiden flight.

I hope I helped some, and if not, google is your friend  Wink

Aero



Try not to be jealous, we can't all be Czech.
User currently offlinePlanebuff From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 20 hours ago) and read 3831 times:

 Smile Thanks Aero! and Flypxd, and MD90fan, HS748 (Am I missing anyone--if so, thanks). That all really helped!  Smile  Smile


Flown on CO, DL, UA, AA, LX, DL Connection by SkyWest, Song (DL).
User currently offlineMhodgson From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2002, 5047 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 17 hours ago) and read 3715 times:

Quoting MD90fan (Reply 2):

Don't believe that section ever



Quoting Planebuff (Reply 5):
That all really helped

Really???

Anyway, the information provided comes from a reputable author who sells books with the information in - I don't think its rubbish at all!



No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
User currently offlinePlanebuff From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 16 hours ago) and read 3615 times:

There you go, Mhodgson, from what I can see they're really nice aircraft (well, neat, yet cramped.) Also, Mhodgson, if you felt that I was being sarcastic when I said "that really helps! IT DOES! SERIOUSLY! IT ISN'T RUBBISH!


Flown on CO, DL, UA, AA, LX, DL Connection by SkyWest, Song (DL).
User currently offlineDrewwright From United States of America, joined May 2001, 621 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 15 hours ago) and read 3582 times:

From my experience on the BAE/AVRO on Mesaba and ASA I always thought it was a great plane room wise. Unless you get a 6 across configured A/C the Avro is the most roomy aircraft in the sky. seatguru.com is a good place to compare with other aircraft.
Only thing I find unusual about the plane is the crazy flap noise it makes. It's a one of a kind sound for sure.


DRW


User currently offlineLN-KGL From Norway, joined Sep 1999, 1039 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 15 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Nothing is better than going direct to the source - here you'll find its BAe brochure:
http://www.baeportal.datathree.com/p...lance_Brochure__September_2004.pdf

Quoting AeroVodochody (Reply 4):
It has a range of about 2,000km and I believe it cruises at around 500 knots.

500 knots is about 100 knots to many


User currently offlineMD90fan From Bahamas, joined Jul 2005, 2931 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3281 times:

Quoting Flypdx (Reply 3):
Do you have anything to back up your statement with?

Well it's not updated. And there are several little thing wrong, like for example it says the PW powered 752 has more power than a RR one  wink 



http://www.devanwells.blogspot.com/
User currently offlineSkidmarks From UK - England, joined Dec 2004, 7121 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

I've not long done a course on the RJ/146. If you need any technical facts let me know. Might help me remember what the hell I'm talking about Big grin

Andy  old 



Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13220 posts, RR: 77
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3201 times:

Never (sadly) flown on one yet.

However, why was it made how it was, what is the context-to me, as important in understanding a type as raw data.

Originally the HS.146, designed in the early 70's, when there was interest in potential 'city centre' airports.
Meaning big noise and airfield space restrictions.

Hawker-Siddeley took a keen interest in this market, even in 1970 proposing a low wing, shorthauler, the HS-141, with two wing mounted high bypass engines, but with large fairings either side of the lower fuselage-for a bank of small turbofan 'lift' engines, enabling vertical take off.
Like the one forward on the F-35B, many times over.
Clearly not practical, rather undermining the need for low noise, but a look at how to do an airliner for city centre airports that would be just enlarged heliports.

So, the more practical HS.146 emerged, but with no suitable engine, if you wanted just two that is, they were not around in 1972/3.
Well almost, Avco developed a very quiet engine, with it's ancestry in the power plant in Chinook helicopters, but four required.

But the oil crisis of 1973, sent shockwaves everywhere, ambitious projects were cancelled, in the UK, this included the Channel Tunnel-already started then, not related to the later completed one.
The Maplin Sands off shore airport, off the coast of South East England.
And the HS-146, apart from the costs of building it, who was about to build centre centre airports in this recession?

In 1978, now as part of British Aerospace, the now BAe-146 was re-launched, as well as the modernised Jetstream from a decade before.

Sales were slow at first, though there was an emerging commuter market, not quite what the HS-146 had been designed to serve though.

Then in 1983, the breakthrough. Though not the first US customer, PSA's order for 25 -146's gave a much needed shot in the arm.
PSA wanted to carry on operating in the increasingly noise sensitive smaller airports in CA , where 727's were too loud, even the new MD-80, both too big for many PSA routes it seems too.
But the BAe-146 did fit.

Sadly, though upgraded to the Avro series which sold well too, BAe dropped the ball by failing to build the 'original' RJX, modernised, re-vamped, with two of the new R/R-BMW engines.
If started in 1992/3, it would have entered service during the regional jet boom.
As it was, the real 'RJX' was another 4-holer, but with new Honeywell engines and other improvements, gained some orders, even flew, but BAE as it was then, killed the whole project in November 2001.


User currently offlineTrb10 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3183 times:

I've been on a flybe BAe 146-300 and it was awful. 6 abreast compared to the usual 5, and I found it really dark and claustrophobic inside and not particularly quiet. Don't want to travel on one again in a hurry!

User currently offlineShankly From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 1544 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3098 times:

Used to love flying Meridiana's 146's into FLR.

A few little traits:

The flaps motors let out what can only be described as a banshee wail...very amusing to see the faces of unsuspecting pax

When it has to get airborne, it really can...full power and then brakes off...great fun

Always loved the cabin as it reminded me of the 1st/2nd generation jets

Miss this little bird on the LGW-FLR run...although the replacement A319's are the nuts



L1011 - P F M
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26538 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

Quoting Flypdx (Reply 3):
Do you have anything to back up your statement with?



Quoting Mhodgson (Reply 6):
Anyway, the information provided comes from a reputable author who sells books with the information in - I don't think its rubbish at all!

He is absolutely right on that one. It is completely inaccurate and misleading in the way it presents information and should not be relied on.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineMD90fan From Bahamas, joined Jul 2005, 2931 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2809 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 15):
He is absolutely right on that one. It is completely inaccurate and misleading in the way it presents information and should not be relied on.

Thanks for telling them, I'm sure there are other facts that are incorrect as well.



http://www.devanwells.blogspot.com/
User currently offlineBA787 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 2596 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2642 times:

I an't remember if BA has 3+3 or 2+2 configuration. Whichever it was it was extremely comfortable, even if it did bounce about on approsch into TRN

Tom


User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6926 posts, RR: 63
Reply 18, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2604 times:

I've been lucky enough to have made 20 flights on BAe 146s (-100, -200, -300) and 54 on Avro RJs (RJ85, RJ100). (With another ARJ to come on 7th July!) Thankfully, almost all flights have been with a five-abreast configuration (on Crossair, Swiss, DAT) and I find that very comfortable. My few flights where the cabin was six-abreast was quite cramped.

I hear it has a comparatively poor record in terms of reliability (though in 74 flights I've never experienced a problem) but as a passenger I love it. Try to get on one - but try to ensure it's five-abreast.

[Edited 2006-06-25 13:08:35]

[Edited 2006-06-25 13:08:57]

User currently offlineMorhas From Malaysia, joined Jun 2006, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2549 times:

This might be the future morphing aircraft  scratchchin  BAE 146

Big version: Width: 280 Height: 186 File size: 107kb
Future morphing aircraft.


Morhas


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fate Of BACON's 4 BAe 146 After March 07? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 23:45:46 by Vfw614
What Airlines Has Operated BAe 146/ Avro RJ & 737? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 04:33:29 by 747400sp
Titan BAe 146 At Northolt posted Fri Jul 21 2006 21:02:40 by Lhrneighbour
BAe 146 Freighter Conversions To Restart? posted Tue Jul 18 2006 22:18:43 by A342
Ex-NW BAE 146 At CGN posted Thu Jun 29 2006 19:30:03 by Chevvy2
Any Bae 146-100 Flights Left In Europe..? posted Thu Jun 29 2006 15:28:27 by TUGMASTER
What Type Of Plane To Replace BAE 146, Avro? posted Tue May 23 2006 13:01:38 by Nijltje
Avro RJs / BAe 146 posted Fri May 12 2006 20:42:56 by FokkerVII
Flybe Using Bae 146 GLA-BHD? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 14:34:51 by Ba757gla
BAe 146 Replacment Found! posted Tue Apr 18 2006 00:28:34 by Azza40