Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airways Indifferent To Airbus's A350 Dilemma  
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 10413 times:

Flight International 6 June 2006 by Mary Kirby

Airframer's Internal Debate Will Not Affect Fleet Replacement Plans, Says Carrier

In a memorandum to employees president and chief executive Doug Parker says US Airways management understands Airbus "is having internal debate as to whether or not they shouldn't start over on the A350." He adds: "If they come back with a new aircraft, great. If they don't and we don't have an order any more, that's fine. The merger's done and [Airbus has] been paid back, so everyone's happy."

...US Airways says it is not considering plans to replace the A330s and 767s with the Boeing 787 if the A350 deal is shelved.

"We have an order for the A350 and that's where our head is at this time. We aren't going to speculate beyond what might happen with the A350 because it's simply still in progress," the airline says. "Airbus is a terrific partner and they are taking the necessary time to consider their options. We'll wait to hear from them."


Is this the first time since Mr. Udvar-Hazy "dropped the dime" on the A350 program at ISTAT in late March that an actual or potential customer has intimated that the design may be fine just the way it is?

40 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 10295 times:

Well since we paid back the money Airbus gave us, Doug has said they aren't committed to buying the plane...they could buy the 787...just depends on who has the better product.

User currently offlineRichardPrice From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 10279 times:

Quoting Leelaw (Thread starter):
Is this the first time since Mr. Udvar-Hazy "dropped the dime" on the A350 program at ISTAT in late March that an actual or potential customer has intimated that the design may be fine just the way it is?

What about Qatar CEOs comments about being committed to the project in any form?


User currently offlineVega From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 10239 times:

Quoting Flyboyaz (Reply 1):
Well since we paid back the money Airbus gave us, Doug has said they aren't committed to buying the plane...they could buy the 787...just depends on who has the better product.



Quoting Leelaw (Thread starter):
In a memorandum to employees president and chief executive Doug Parker says US Airways management understands Airbus "is having internal debate as to whether or not they shouldn't start over on the A350." He adds: "If they come back with a new aircraft, great. If they don't and we don't have an order any more, that's fine. The merger's done and [Airbus has] been paid back, so everyone's happy."

Nope. "If they don't (come back with a solution for the 350) we don't have an order any more". Then and only then are they not obligated to buy anything else from Airbus.


User currently offlineMptpa From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 546 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 10194 times:

At the time US Airways made the credit facility deal to exit Ch11, they would have cared less if the deal included them to buy A310s!!

It is a different story now however.


User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 10035 times:

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 2):
What about Qatar CEOs comments about being committed to the project in any form?

I don't recall Mr. Al-Baker making such sanguine remarks about the A350 lately, certainly not since ISTAT; his most recent remarks seem far more cautionary:

“We are launch customer for an aircraft that, other than its model number, does not now exist. Qatar Airways is very unhappy about this,” says Al Baker. He questions how Airbus will “address this issue with A350 customers who have placed deposits”.

Airbus chief executive Gustav Humbert said at last week’s ILA show that the A350 timetable would “depend on the changes we do”. Referring to customers who have already signed up to the aircraft, he said: “If you will get a better aircraft than you have ordered, then you will be happy.”

Al Baker says that in light of the development, Qatar “might be forced to re-evaluate the 787 and could get preferential delivery dates from Boeing”. Qatar Airways’ repeated requests since selecting the A350 in June last year that Airbus should revise the design have been “vindicated” by the manufacturer’s expected U-turn, says Al Baker. “The trouble is, Airbus has lost a year.” He says he expects Airbus to be able to show him a firm specification for the new design “by early June”.


http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...o+uncertainty+over+twinjet's.html


User currently offlineTimboflier215 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 1342 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 9947 times:

It's interesting that US have been so quiet on the whole A350 redesign. And the fact that Doug Parker now compliments Airbus seems to me to mean that they are, in fact, happy with the A350 in its current form. After all, if they had wanted to be shot of the order so that they could order Boeing, wouldn't they have jumped on the band-wagon and joined other airlines in saying the A350 was not up to scratch??

User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 9898 times:

Quoting Timboflier215 (Reply 6):
t's interesting that US have been so quiet on the whole A350 redesign. And the fact that Doug Parker now compliments Airbus seems to me to mean that they are, in fact, happy with the A350 in its current form. After all, if they had wanted to be shot of the order so that they could order Boeing, wouldn't they have jumped on the band-wagon and joined other airlines in saying the A350 was not up to scratch??

Actually, I recall seeing remarks attributed to Mr. Parker that were far less sanguine about the merits/prospects of the "old all-new A350" in earlier media reports since ISTAT. Perhaps he was ambivalent all along?


User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12804 posts, RR: 46
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 9725 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Flyboyaz (Reply 1):
Well since we paid back the money Airbus gave us, Doug has said they aren't committed to buying the plane...they could buy the 787...just depends on who has the better product.

 confused 

US has a firm order for 20 A350s. That's not exactly "uncommitted" is it?

But also note:

Quote:
...US Airways says it is not considering plans to replace the A330s and 767s with the Boeing 787 if the A350 deal is shelved.

So it would appear that US is even less interested in the committing to the 787.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9263 posts, RR: 21
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 9458 times:

It looks like this one is really up in the air, as to whether US stays with its order for 20 A350s or cancels that in favor of the 787. Then again, they have been pleased with their products, so is it any wonder why US is essentially saying "it's worth the wait."

However, IIRC, I thought I saw on a previous thread that Doug Parker said that the original design of the A350 was inadequate; I believe that was well over a month ago and before airbus announced the "new and improved A350." I have seen the A350 and 787 interior photos before, looked at the stats, the range, pax loads etc... I think that both aircraft are going to be fine.



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineClassicLover From Ireland, joined Mar 2004, 4656 posts, RR: 23
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 9359 times:

Quoting Leelaw (Thread starter):
Is this the first time since Mr. Udvar-Hazy "dropped the dime" on the A350 program at ISTAT in late March that an actual or potential customer has intimated that the design may be fine just the way it is?

Finnair haven't said anything bad. With regards to a redesign, they said they were happy to wait and see what Airbus came up with also.



I do quite enjoy a spot of flying - more so when it's not in Economy!
User currently offlineKhobar From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2379 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 9264 times:

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 9):
It looks like this one is really up in the air, as to whether US stays with its order for 20 A350s or cancels that in favor of the 787.

US Airways said they wouldn't consider buying Boeing.

"...US Airways says it is not considering plans to replace the A330s and 767s with the Boeing 787 if the A350 deal is shelved."

So it's Airbus or nothing.


User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8433 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9196 times:

I think it gets down to Airbus deciding if they are still going to deliver the 350 along with the 370. If they are then US will obviously take the plane under the existing contract.

It might be a tough decision for Airbus, though. The 350 will still take R&D resources, which would take away from the 370. On the positive side, they have already invested a fair amount of money in it and will probably look to recovering some, if not all, of that investment with sales.


User currently offlineANNOYEDFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 451 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9168 times:

I mean come on already would they just cancel the damn order and order the 787. It's a far superior plane and it seem's airbus can't get their head on striaght from the name of the plane to the size to what it's economic's is going to be.


"TWA... One Mission, Yours."
User currently offlineSlz396 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9143 times:

I think you will see emerge 2 groups of A350 customers, more along the lines of CAPACITY requirements than along the lines of DELIVERY dates.

After all, 2 to 3 years might seem like a long period, but there is very good interim airlift available: the A330, the best in its class.

I think you'll see most of those who've ordered the A350-900 so far will won't feel too troubled with Airbus re-doing their design work as they will get a much better plane than originally expected.

However, those who had their eyes mainly on the A350-800 probably feel less comfortable, because it is said the smallest version of the new A370 will be significantly larger than the A350-800 they had set their minds on.

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 12):
think it gets down to Airbus deciding if they are still going to deliver the 350 along with the 370. It might be a tough decision for Airbus. The 350 will still take R&D resources, which would take away from the 370. On the positive side, they have already invested a fair amount of money in it and will probably look to recovering some, if not all, of that investment with sales.

In order NOT to loose the second group (the A350-800) customers, it would make sense for Airbus not to shelf this version, but to offer it alongside the all new A370. It could be done quite easily IF Airbus returns to the original plan and the A350-800 is merely a re-engined A330 with some low cost improvements. US Airways for instance committed quite early in the program to the A350, so the performance guarantees in their contract probably are within reach of such a modest make-over of the A330 aka A350-800 anyway and the improvements to the A330 could be very usefull for the soon to be launched A330F also.


User currently offlineBreiz From France, joined Mar 2005, 1917 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9116 times:

Quoting Leelaw (Thread starter):
the airline says. "Airbus is a terrific partner and they are taking the necessary time to consider their options. We'll wait to hear from them."

This is the one comment which should warm the hearts of people at Airbus in these adverse times.


User currently offline11Bravo From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1722 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 9076 times:

Quoting Khobar (Reply 11):
US Airways said they wouldn't consider buying Boeing.

"...US Airways says it is not considering plans to replace the A330s and 767s with the Boeing 787 if the A350 deal is shelved."

So it's Airbus or nothing.

I think you're misinterpreting that. the article also says:

Quote:
"We have an order for the A350 and that's where our head is at this time. We aren't going to speculate beyond what might happen with the A350 because it's simply still in progress," the airline says. "Airbus is a terrific partner and they are taking the necessary time to consider their options. We'll wait to hear from them."

That indicates to me that they are in "wait and see" mode. I see nothing in their comments to suggest that they categorically rule out a possible B787 purchase if the A350 turns out to not suit their needs.



WhaleJets Rule!
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9263 posts, RR: 21
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8916 times:

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 16):
That indicates to me that they are in "wait and see" mode. I see nothing in their comments to suggest that they categorically rule out a possible B787 purchase if the A350 turns out to not suit their needs.

That was my interpretation as well. Thanks



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8900 times:

Quoting ClassicLover (Reply 10):
Finnair haven't said anything bad. With regards to a redesign, they said they were happy to wait and see what Airbus came up with also.

You're right, my bad:

Oneworld member Finnair’s new chief executive, Jukka Hienonen, has no plans to review the airline’s decision to acquire Airbus A350 aircraft, despite the uncertainty about the twin-jet programme.

...the airline is “pretty calm with the issue” of potentially extensive changes to the aircraft...

...“If Airbus has to redesign it, then it will only be a better aircraft,” says Hienonen, pointing out that Finnair has not been among those pressing for modifications. “We bought the aircraft as it was. The specification has not been changed because of our desires.”


http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...review+A350+order+Finnair+CEO.html

Quoting Slz396 (Reply 14):
After all, 2 to 3 years might seem like a long period, but there is very good interim airlift available: the A330, the best in its class.

If Airbus has to provide interim lift to customers in the form of A330s in any kind of significant numbers, they'll be extremely lucky to even breakeven on such an enterprise on a discounted cash flow basis.

[Edited 2006-06-05 19:58:29]

User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25566 posts, RR: 86
Reply 19, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8802 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

One can only hope that the voices of Mr. Parker and Mr. Hienonen are not drowned out by others.

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12804 posts, RR: 46
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8740 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 9):
It looks like this one is really up in the air, as to whether US stays with its order for 20 A350s or cancels that in favor of the 787.



Quoting ANNOYEDFA (Reply 13):
I mean come on already would they just cancel the damn order and order the 787. It's a far superior plane and it seem's airbus can't get their head on striaght from the name of the plane to the size to what it's economic's is going to be.



Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 16):
I see nothing in their comments to suggest that they categorically rule out a possible B787 purchase if the A350 turns out to not suit their needs.



Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 17):
That was my interpretation as well. Thanks

Guys, read the quotation before making comments that make you look, well, silly! wink 

"...US Airways says it is not considering plans to replace the A330s and 767s with the Boeing 787 if the A350 deal is shelved."

As said above - it's Airbus or nothing. It's not difficult.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21562 posts, RR: 59
Reply 21, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8706 times:

Sounds like US would take more 330s if the 350/370 doesn't fit their needs (too large in new form).

It's not like US has 7000nm routes anyway, nor have I heard of major plans for US to expand to India, Australia, Singapore, HKG, etc.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31259 posts, RR: 85
Reply 22, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7723 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

US is probably just happy they get a few extra years to figure out how to pay for whatever new widebodies they do take.

As both US and HP have favored Airbus in their purchases as of late, and the fact their long-haul equipment doesn't face a lot of competition from PHL or CLT, I can see them deciding to stick with the A330 and take advantage of Airbus discounting to move the product in the face of the 787, saving them cash on the purchase and cash on the necessary supplimentary costs of introducing and operating a new type of plane.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 23, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7499 times:

Quoting Khobar (Reply 11):
So it's Airbus or nothing.

I disagree. If the A350 is shelved, US owes Airbus nothing. They COULD change their minds and go for a Boeing product. You never know whats going to happen. The airline industry is unpredictable. So this can go either way. I think US wants to wait, but who knows how this will really come out.....

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 16):
see nothing in their comments to suggest that they categorically rule out a possible B787 purchase if the A350 turns out to not suit their needs.

My thoughts exactly!

Quoting Scbriml (Reply 20):
As said above - it's Airbus or nothing. It's not difficult.

You never know.... That could change...

Quoting Stitch (Reply 23):
US is probably just happy they get a few extra years to figure out how to pay for whatever new widebodies they do take.

 checkmark 



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12804 posts, RR: 46
Reply 24, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7447 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 24):
Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 16):
see nothing in their comments to suggest that they categorically rule out a possible B787 purchase if the A350 turns out to not suit their needs.

My thoughts exactly!

US Airways says it is not considering plans to replace the A330s and 767s with the Boeing 787 if the A350 deal is shelved.

 confused 



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
25 AirframeAS : You never know....that COULD change....
26 JBirdAV8r : That's the quote. I take that to mean they're sticking with the A350 until they hear that something drastic has changed and the A350 either won't be
27 Leelaw : One does wonder whether "the dilemma" regarding the "A350" has indeed been resolved internally at Airbus? Perhaps the recent comments from U.S. Airway
28 SonOfACaptain : Parker has said in a webcast (whens talks were beginning about Airbus going back to the drawing board for the A350) that if Airbus decided to keep the
29 TrojanAE : It seems that US Airways is definitely comitted to Airbus and even if the A350 as they ordered it is shelved they would rather go for A330s than for t
30 Usairways85 : The fact is though that US needs more widebodies. Refurbishing the 762's this fall/winter is just a stop gap until new widebodies arrive. I thought A3
31 Atmx2000 : I have a hard time imagining that US will be happy if there is no A332/A358 sized aircraft that has competitive operating costs. I suspect that a 250
32 SonOfACaptain : No it doesn't. If Airbus doesn't satisfy its needs, US will have no problems with going to Boeing. -SOAC
33 Vega : The answer to that question is the BIG question, in my mind. What are Parker's future plans, internationally, for this airline? Does US have a long r
34 Usairways85 : The existance of transatlantic travel on US pretty much depends on PHL. CLT can't support the transatlantic flts as PHL does, BOS is already well dev
35 Steeler83 : At least now anyway. I give it at least 2-5 years and see what happens. Could likely take more than 5 years though for any substantial international
36 Usairways85 : Yes, down the road PIT may see LGW/LHR(who knows in 5 years) or FRA return. However i was just stating the PIT can't support the transatlantic traffic
37 Spartanmjf : Hope springs eternal for the unabashed supporters of Airbus...
38 Steeler83 : It just goes to show how crooked politicians can screw up a city... They did nothing to support city growth, didn't work well with the main carrier a
39 Usairways85 : While i have never connected through PIT i have heard that it is a great connecting city and i am not familiar with the city politics but the main fac
40 CentPIT : Yes, you are obsolesced correct! However, Pittsburgh O&D traffic is on a def. rebound. While it may not be enough of an increase to regain a hub, It
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways Alternative To The A350? posted Fri Oct 6 2006 07:49:18 by Vega
US Airways Pilots To Picket posted Fri Sep 22 2006 16:10:51 by Mah584jr
US Airways Express To Begin CLT-HPN, End PIT-HPN posted Mon Sep 18 2006 17:54:48 by A330323X
US Airways Pays Off Airbus/ATSB Loans posted Sun Apr 9 2006 08:29:08 by Ouboy79
US Airways 757's To Europe. Questions... posted Sat Feb 11 2006 15:40:39 by Gilesdavies
US Airways Service To Barbados posted Fri Jan 20 2006 00:32:16 by BGIplanefreak
US Airways Express To OKC? posted Mon Jan 9 2006 21:08:58 by AZFLYER84
Are US Airways Still To Receive The A330-200? posted Tue Dec 20 2005 14:06:30 by Gilesdavies
US Airways 757's To Europe? posted Tue Dec 20 2005 14:00:08 by Gilesdavies
US Airways' Flight To The North Pole posted Tue Dec 6 2005 17:40:51 by Pmg1704