Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
PM Blair Returns From Holiday...With Ryanair!  
User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 15
Posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3732 times:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/05062006/32...day-blair-flies-home-low-cost.html

It was reported that fellow passengers were shocked when Blair and his seven-member entourage boarded a FR 737 at Rome Ciampino on Saturday for the flight back to London after his holiday in Tuscany. I wonder if Cherie was with him, and if she settled for a coffee at £2.50 from the refreshment trolley?!?

Well at least this is a step in the right direction, after using costly private aircraft for his holidays in the past.

So if FR is good enough for the Prime Minister, it should silence the FR bashers.

[Edited 2006-06-05 18:24:52]


MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMhodgson From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2002, 5047 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3708 times:

He has done it before - IIRC, Ryanair used it to target an ad campaign at easyJet. And I'm sure it has nothing to do with his poor image in the eye of the public at the moment!


No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
User currently offlineTrb10 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3674 times:

And I bet he never encountered attituded or a delayed flight from FR......

User currently offlineMagyarorszag From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3674 times:

Well, from what I remember, a few years ago (3-4) Tony Blair travelled with his whole family to and from southern France for his holiday with Buzz! Any correction welcomed!

User currently offlineARGinLON From Vatican City, joined Jun 2005, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3674 times:

I am really surprised at this. Following all the security measures behind him whenever he moves is hard to believe he flies FR.
As a customer I don't think I'll be that happy to be on the same flight as him (security issues).
What a contrast! From his own 772 when flying on duty to this when on holidays


User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6938 posts, RR: 77
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3632 times:

Quoting BCAL (Thread starter):
So if FR is good enough for the Prime Minister, it should silence the FR bashers.

Why would anyone change her/his mind just because a famous individial chooses to travel on that airline? I would fly FR only if there's definitely no other travel option - I couldn't care less about other passengers.


PH



Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2821 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3620 times:

Bad Blair! Everyone knows how unpopular FR is with the political elites these days because of its big low cost flight business. He should be doing what a Labour leader should be doing and paying through the nose for the flight to demonstrate important morality about aviation: only the rich may fly on holiday!

User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3530 times:

Quoting Trb10 (Reply 2):
And I bet he never encountered attituded or a delayed flight from FR

Well if the F/As were die hard Tories or disenchanted Labour supporters, I am sure that they would have perhaps wiped the galley floor with his roll/sandwich or perhaps spat in his coffee before serving it to the PM or Cruella DeVil, if she was with him! The flight was delayed by 25 minutes ... for additional security checks.

 devil 

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 5):
Why would anyone change her/his mind just because a famous individial chooses to travel on that airline?

Some people do! Why do you think stores/shop are very keen to have "By appointment to HRH Queen Elizabeth II" crests?

 Big grin



MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
User currently offlineGSM763 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3386 times:

IIRC in about 2002 it was announced that Blair would be flying with a low cost airline. A tabloid then printed that he would be flying with U2 and as there was no official denial U2 put up large billboards saying "Tony Blair got a bargin so can you". I bet there were a few red faces when they read he was on an FR flight!

User currently offlineSKY1 From Spain, joined Apr 2006, 879 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3089 times:

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 5):
I would fly FR only if there's definitely no other travel option


 checkmark 



Time flies! Enjoy life!
User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3046 times:

I wait to see George Bush flying America West !


So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineCoa747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2865 times:

Secret Service would never allow it especially post 9-11. Although a sitting US President has flown commercial before. It has happened more than once the last time I believe United had the privilage on a DC-10 can't remember the president though. I read an article on it a few years ago. Any one else know what I am talking about.

User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3763 posts, RR: 29
Reply 12, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2841 times:

Quoting Coa747 (Reply 11):
It has happened more than once the last time I believe United had the privilage on a DC-10 can't remember the president though.

Did they call it United One then?


User currently offlineCoa747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2796 times:

I don't know but I remember it was a nightmare, because the aircraft had to have special equipment installed for the President's use and all of first class was basically blocked off. In the end the inconvenience and cost associated with ensuring the Secret Service was satisfied with the security of the aircraft meant that United had a DC-10 out of service for a more than a few days and the cost savings were negligable. Not to mention the inconvenience to the airline and the passengers. Lets just say it won't happen again. A lot people fail to consider the logistical needs involved in transporting the President or other heads of state. Even if you eliminate the 747 you still have all the support planes that fly in the Presidential motorcade and all the other people and equipment needed. Usually an Air Force C5 is responsible for transporting the motorcade and you can bet the cost of operating that far exceeds Air Force One. On some international trips they have two whole motorcades to transport with one being a decoy.

User currently offlineKappel From Suriname, joined Jul 2005, 3533 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2769 times:

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 12):
Did they call it United One then?

No, IIRC Air Force One. Any aircraft carrying the president is Air Force One. Anybody agree/disagree?



L1011,733,734,73G,738,743,744,752,763,772,77W,DC855,DC863,DC930,DC950,MD11,MD88,306,319,320,321,343,346,ARJ85,CR7,E195
User currently offlineJlbmedia From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 623 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2720 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

When the President is in his helicopter, I believe it is then Marine one, as this is a Marine helicopter, so I am not sure how the Designations would work outside of the US Military. I believe, and I am not 100% sure that it was President Nixon the flew the United DC-10.


JLB54061
User currently offlineCoa747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

I think you are right I think it was Nixon and he was going to LA I believe. I Wish I could remember where that article was. Interesting none the less. On longer trips the PM usually catches a ride on a chartered BA 777 isn't that right. The queen has gone commercial more than a few times if I recall right. I remember a trip to NZ many years ago and it seems she flew Air New Zealand, seemed odd at the time as I thought she would have gone on BA but I could be mistaken as I am a bloody American.

User currently offlineDL787932ER From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 597 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2569 times:

Quoting Kappel (Reply 14):

No, IIRC Air Force One. Any aircraft carrying the president is Air Force One. Anybody agree/disagree?

Incorrect. The callsign for an aircraft transporting the U.S. President is [military branch] One - since the VC-25As are Air Force planes, their callsign when the President is on board is Air Force One. The Marine helicopter is Marine One when the President is on board, and (for example) when Bush landed on the aircraft carrier in a Navy jet, its callsign was Navy One. Same thing for Coast Guard One or Army One, if the President ever chanced to be in a CG or Army aircraft.

It only applies when the President is on board, though. The VC-25As are commonly known as AF1, but if the President isn't on board they get a regular callsign.

If the aircraft is civilian, the callsign is Executive One. I thought I'd read somewhere that that callsign was only used once, when Nixon took a private jet somewhere, but I could be wrong.

On a side note, how would it work for a world leader to travel commercially, or in a chartered aircraft? Wouldn't it take days or weeks to set up security, emergency communications, etc.? How come the UK PM doesn't have a state aircraft?



F L Y D E L T A J E T S
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2563 times:

Quoting Coa747 (Reply 16):
I remember a trip to NZ many years ago and it seems she flew Air New Zealand, seemed odd at the time as I thought she would have gone on BA but I could be mistaken as I am a bloody American.

From other threads, it seems it's customary for the host country's airline or Government VVIP aircraft where she is head-of-state to fetch HM and her entourage from, then bring them back to, the UK.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineAirNZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2506 times:

Quoting BCAL (Reply 7):
Some people do! Why do you think stores/shop are very keen to have "By appointment to HRH Queen Elizabeth II" crests?

You really mean HM.....not HRH!!


User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2821 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2486 times:

Quoting Coa747 (Reply 16):
The queen has gone commercial more than a few times if I recall right. I remember a trip to NZ many years ago and it seems she flew Air New Zealand, seemed odd at the time as I thought she would have gone on BA but I could be mistaken as I am a bloody American.

She is the head of state of New Zealand as well. She's also the head of state of Canada and Australia as well hence solving the energy security problem. She can just tell them to give us their uranium.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Australia, New Zealand Possible From SEA With 787? posted Mon Aug 7 2006 05:55:27 by STT757
Maxjet Starts "connections" With Ryanair... posted Thu Jul 6 2006 14:05:59 by Debonair
From Argentina With Love posted Sat Jul 1 2006 15:06:24 by LVZXV
SAA 744 Returns To LHR With Cracked Window posted Mon May 8 2006 09:35:13 by Andz
Getting A Refund With Ryanair posted Thu Apr 27 2006 13:13:09 by EGFF
Southwest Returns To LAX With Shattered Window posted Thu Mar 9 2006 04:31:40 by AS739X
Whats Going On With Ryanair? posted Wed Feb 1 2006 02:01:17 by EZYAirbus
UAL Aircraft Returns To Tokyo With Smoke posted Fri Sep 16 2005 22:37:44 by AndrewUber
More Airports Do Battle With Ryanair posted Fri Sep 2 2005 14:06:49 by Leisurejet
Notes From Meeting With Boeing Exec's posted Wed Jul 6 2005 23:51:49 by BCAInfoSys