Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CRJ 900X  
User currently offlineCHALLENGER300 From Canada, joined May 2006, 6 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2085 times:

Just heard on Montreal radio that the crj900x is a go. Supposed to be launched today, apparently same GE engines to power it. Waiting for official announcement on Bombardier site.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBigSky123 From Slovenia, joined Dec 2005, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2034 times:

Is this jet going to be based on the same design as the CRJ200/700/900 or will it look more like the Embraer ERJ series with engines on the wings?

User currently offlineParabolica From Spain, joined Mar 2006, 85 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2030 times:

As a Canadian I would dearly love to see Bombardier bounce back and continue to build quality aerospace products. However and a Canadian I also don't see this happening, as our country seems destined to shoot itself in the foot whenever the aerospace industry is concerned. Mr. Harper's government will never back it, and for some reason it feels like the Canadian public likes to see our best companies fail.

HOWEVER, I will be the first and loudest to applaud when and if this wonderful thing happens and I can fly on a modern, innovative and advanced Canadian jet airliner.

P-



oh please let there never be cell phones in airliners...
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting BigSky123 (Reply 1):

Basically a stretch of the 900.


User currently offlineBigSky123 From Slovenia, joined Dec 2005, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Quoting Boeing nut (Reply 3):
Basically a stretch of the 900.

Isn't the 900 already a strecth of the 700? And the 700 a stretch of the 200? Big grin I mean, how much more can they stretch this design?!

I do remember once seeing a Bombardier regional jet concept with the engines hanging of the wings. Which model was that?


User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2152 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1904 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CHALLENGER300 (Thread starter):
Just heard on Montreal radio that the crj900x is a go. Supposed to be launched today, apparently same GE engines to power it. Waiting for official announcement on Bombardier site.

Did the radio report sound real, as in a proper news release from BBD?

So far on the BBD.com news site there is only a story about securing a rail contract, dated June 6... so far, though  Smile

Some airline must be in a hurry if they can't wait until Farnborough...



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1808 times:

Quoting BigSky123 (Reply 4):
I do remember once seeing a Bombardier regional jet concept with the engines hanging of the wings. Which model was that?

That was the C Series which has been on the shelf for a couple months now. That program was designed for 100-130 passengers.


User currently offlineBigSky123 From Slovenia, joined Dec 2005, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1761 times:

Thanks, Boeing Nut!

I was now finally able to find a few articles on the concept. Too bad it was scrapped.

One of the reports quotes Bombardier:

Quote:
The company wants to pick up where illustrious names such as British Aerospace, McDonnell Douglas and Fokker left off by producing an “optimized” aircraft at the “lower end of the 100- to 150-passenger market.” It would replace designs like the BAe 146, DC-9/MD-80, and F70 and F100, and others such as the Boeing 737-100/200/300/400/500 that will be retired by 2010. About 3,900 examples of these types remain in service “without a suitable replacement,”

http://www.ainonline.com/Publications/farn/farn_04/d2bombardierp3.html

I wonder why did they decide this isn't true anymore?

Big version: Width: 250 Height: 166 File size: 34kb

Such a cool looking plane...


User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2152 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1588 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CHALLENGER300 (Thread starter):
Just heard on Montreal radio that the crj900x is a go. Supposed to be launched today, apparently same GE engines to power it. Waiting for official announcement on Bombardier site.

Still nothing, eh?

Was the report a hoax or just the result of some blabbermouth saying something to a reporter that he or she shouldn't have said yet?



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineCHALLENGER300 From Canada, joined May 2006, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1456 times:

After a few days of waiting, I found that the announcement of the other day was a vp of bbd announcing that the assembly site would be at the Mirabel plant north of Montreal where the existing, crj700,900 are being assembled presently. Further to this is that the airframe would retain the same engine existing on the -900, and that the wing would be increased with winglet extensions, eight percent. All very brief, but I imagine the official go will be at Farnborough. The rumour at the shop is that the first plugs have already been joined and that a complete plane should be assembled soon. But as anyone knows, rumours will be rumours until they come to fruition.

User currently offlineCHALLENGER300 From Canada, joined May 2006, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1443 times:

oh ya!...First delivery to customer said to be in the fall of 2008!

User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2152 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1381 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CHALLENGER300 (Reply 9):
Further to this is that the airframe would retain the same engine existing on the -900, and that the wing would be increased with winglet extensions, eight percent. All very brief, but I imagine the official go will be at Farnborough. The rumour at the shop is that the first plugs have already been joined and that a complete plane should be assembled soon.

Only winglets to be extended, not wingtips? How much can they stretch the fuselage with the same wing... 3 frames max?

I'm very glad to hear that there might be one more CRJ...  Smile I hope they call this one CRJ905... that's nine-ooo-fiiive, baby!  Wink



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CRJ-900X Q400X Any News? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 16:09:16 by KSUpilot
CRJ 900X posted Tue Jun 6 2006 14:19:32 by CHALLENGER300
CRJ 900X Close To Launch posted Fri May 26 2006 01:18:04 by Aeronut
Questions About The CRJ 900X And The Q400 Stretch posted Wed Feb 1 2006 12:38:11 by OyKIE
JAL RFP To Order 10 To 15 CRJ Or E-JETS posted Fri Nov 17 2006 13:12:45 by PanAm_DC10
Difference Between CRJ-705 And CRJ-900 posted Wed Nov 8 2006 20:25:25 by Haggis79
Mesaba And The CRJ's posted Wed Nov 1 2006 01:52:00 by TheFlyingMoose
Bombardier Cuts Over 3,000 Jobs Due To CRJ-700/900 posted Tue Oct 24 2006 14:40:11 by Drgmobile
Jazz CRJ-705 At YQL? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 00:09:44 by CYQL
Largest CRJ Operators posted Tue Oct 10 2006 07:49:37 by Flyf15