Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Marshals Concerned They're Too Visible  
User currently offlineLAXPAX From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 80 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3587 times:

I can't remember whether it was in Civil Av or Tech/Ops (and the search engine didn't find it of course), but a while back there was a thread about how US Air Marshals are too easily spotted.

Well, an article published today reports that a House of Representatives committee has released a report on airline security, in which Air Marshals make the exact same complaints.

"One recommendation in the report, which included comments that air marshals submitted to the Transportation Security Administration over the past four years, was to end their requisite boarding with the airline flight crew, and instead board the plane with passengers."

Click here to see the full article.


"Remember, no matter where you go... there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
37 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineConfuscius From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3863 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3570 times:

The're packed and still concerned? Hmmm...  Wink


Ain't I a stinker?
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3559 times:

I don't think it's the boarding with the crew that makes them obvious - the short-sleeve white shirt with tie, the Marine buzz-cut, the NRA tattoo and the post-traumatic stress syndrome tic are a dead giveaway  Smile

User currently offlineSirOmega From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 735 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3546 times:

Indeed, at the yearly hackers convention in LAS (Defcon), there is a game called "spot the fed" were whenever you see a fed, you can go find one of the people running it and then you win a prize if they actually are a fed (you can ask them questions like "did your director recently resign/transfer/get appointed" or stuff that doesnt involve names and identifying anyone, the feds are usually good sports about it).

They need to board with a wife and two kids, that'll throw everyone off.


User currently offlineFXramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7298 posts, RR: 85
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3497 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Where did I read that on a domestic flight out of LAX, the a/c had to return to the gate because the FAM hadn't boarded yet. I think he got a round of applause aftering boarding.

 box 


User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5523 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3480 times:

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 2):
I don't think it's the boarding with the crew that makes them obvious - the short-sleeve white shirt with tie, the Marine buzz-cut, the NRA tattoo and the post-traumatic stress syndrome tic are a dead giveaway

It's that or the fact that they board after the crew, in civilian clothes, alone or together, before the customers do. Or also hang around the podium/gate area.

It is fun to spot them in terminals. You can spot them a mile away. They stick out like sore thumbs. Every time (must be cause I know what to look for, although if I know what to look, the bad people certainly do too).



You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3104 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3438 times:

Sorry, I'm going to go against the grain here - why do FAM's need to be hidden from view anyways? This isn't East Germany after all - we don't need to have "stasi" secret police among us at all times to stay safe. I say put them out there in their uniforms to show potential troublemakers that they're there  duck .

User currently offlineSA7700 From South Africa, joined Dec 2003, 3431 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3382 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting EWRCabincrew (Reply 5):
It is fun to spot them in terminals. You can spot them a mile away. They stick out like sore thumbs. Every time (must be cause I know what to look for, although if I know what to look, the bad people certainly do too).

When at an airport, I am usually busy trying to spot planes, not marshals...  spin 


Rgds

SA7700



When you are doing stuff that nobody has done before, there is no manual – Kevin McCloud (Grand Designs)
User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5523 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3368 times:

Quoting SA7700 (Reply 7):
When at an airport, I am usually busy trying to spot planes, not marshals...

Fair enough. 2 points for SA7700.



You can't cure stupid
User currently offline3201 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3359 times:

Quoting SirOmega (Reply 3):
They need to board with a wife and two kids, that'll throw everyone off.

Or be the wife and two kids, that would throw people off even more.


User currently offlineBWI757 From Israel, joined Dec 2004, 429 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3348 times:

Quoting EWRCabincrew (Reply 8):

When at an airport, I am usually busy trying to spot planes, not marshals..

Unless of course the FAM is wearing an a.net pin/luggage tag/cap

BWI757



I live in the US but my heart is in Jerusalem!
User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3316 times:

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 6):
Sorry, I'm going to go against the grain here - why do FAM's need to be hidden from view anyways? This isn't East Germany after all - we don't need to have "stasi" secret police among us at all times to stay safe. I say put them out there in their uniforms to show potential troublemakers that they're there duck .

Becuase if a terrorist knew who the FAM was, they would kill them first.

AAndrew


User currently offlineEHHO From Bulgaria, joined Dec 2005, 815 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3316 times:

I once had an air marshal on CO from GYE to PTY and EWR, and this guy had his firearm in plain sight and wore a teesh with "Enduring Freedom" on it..  scratchchin   scratchchin 


"Get your facts first. Then you may distort them as much as you please" -- Mark Twain
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3306 times:

Quoting EHHO (Reply 12):
wore a teesh with "Enduring Freedom" on it..

That's subtle ! Way to not get spotted, silly fascist.


User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5523 posts, RR: 56
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3293 times:

Quoting EHHO (Reply 12):
I once had an air marshal on CO from GYE to PTY and EWR, and this guy had his firearm in plain sight and wore a teesh with "Enduring Freedom" on it..

Did you let the flight crew know of this? The TSA? The Dept. of Homeland Security? The FAA?

What an idiot to expose your identity to others for a supposed "covert" activity. You should have stopped at his seat and said aloud "thanks for protecting us"  stirthepot 



You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineAeroplan73 From Canada, joined May 2006, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3268 times:

Quoting SirOmega (Reply 3):
They need to board with a wife and two kids, that'll throw everyone off.

Yeah but you want them to protect the plane, not go postal from stress.  banghead 



I remember, the choices were chicken or fish. I had the lasagna.
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3104 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3247 times:

Quoting Aa757first (Reply 11):
Becuase if a terrorist knew who the FAM was, they would kill them first.

But how would they be able to after going through TSA? Furthermore, if laymen on this site can identify the FAM's, don't you think terrorists that are well-informed and have done their research will know who it is anyways? Any potential terrorist who would hijack a plane and go through the planning that the 9/11 hijackers did would certainly know who the FAMs were based on the boarding process, etc.


User currently offlineHiflyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2172 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3158 times:

DENVER -- U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard is calling for a federal inquiry into the Denver office of the Air Marshal Service after several current and former air marshals blew the whistle on serious security breakdowns and talked exclusively to 7NEWS Investigator Tony Kovaleski.

The agency's national director will be in Denver on Tuesday and that's clearly one reason why the air marshals are talking. While they cannot and did not disclose sensitive or classified information, the air marshals do want the public and the national director to hear the truth.

"To tell you the truth, the American people aren't safe and neither are the air marshals," said one air marshal.

"I am definitely more afraid of my managers than I am of terrorists," another air marshal said.

In the days following Sept. 11, 2001, more than 200,000 Americans applied to become federal air marshals. Only the best were handed the badge and the responsibility of protecting the flying public.

"After the events that transpired on 9-11, I felt a personal duty to do my part for this country," one air marshal said.

"We watched with the rest of the country that day and vowed we were never going to let that happen again," an air marshal said.

During the past weekend, five current Denver-based federal air marshals put their careers at risk, exposing breakdowns in security that they say their managers have created or failed to fix.

"If something doesn't change, another 9-11 is very possible," one air marshal said.

"It's a disservice to the American people and a disservice to the federal Air Marshal's Service not sitting here," said another air marshal, explaining why he was talking to Kovaleski.

"This isn't the first choice -- sitting in front of a TV camera?" Kovaleski asked.

"This is absolutely the last choice," an air marshal said.

All five air marshals asked 7NEWS to disguise their identities and alter their voices. They want to alert pilots, passengers and politicians and they want to keep their jobs.

"I know that I'll receive retaliation for what I'm saying if they find out who I am," an air marshal said.

All five air marshals say the security and morale problems begin behind office doors -- with management maneuvers compromising air marshals' undercover identities.

"You might as well put us in uniform and put us on the planes with semiautomatic weapons," said one air marshal.

"You're saying anybody with any kind of intelligence could pick you out on most flights?" Kovaleski asked.

"Absolutely," one air marshal said.

"In my opinion, I will be the first target on that aircraft because they no longer have to bring on board any weapon of any type, other than a shoestring to strangle me while I'm sitting in my seat, take my weapon, and then they have the aircraft," an air marshal said.

During the past week, 7NEWS Investigators have talked with more than a dozen current and former Denver-based air marshals. Many confirmed knowledge of a year-long internal investigation into management of the Denver office.

"Are the personnel issues inside Denver's federal air marshal's office compromising public safety?" Kovaleski asked.

"I believe that the issues are compromising public safety significantly," said one air marshal.

All five current air marshals claim they have repeatedly warned management in the Denver office -- warnings that have produced no apparent change or reaction. It's amplified tensions and reportedly contributed to 10 percent of Denver's air marshals turning in their badges.

"I have not met a Denver federal air marshal that is not actively looking or open to another job," said one air marshal.

"I'd take a $50,000 pay cut and I know guys that have left this office that have taken more of a pay cut," said another air marshal.

"Do you feel at times that you are on a sinking ship?" Kovaleski asked.

"Everyday," a federal air marshal responded.

The agent in charge of the Denver office was told he could not talk to 7NEWS on camera and 7NEWS has been told that the national director of the federal air marshals will not comment.

The only statement to 7NEWS from the agency said in part that "the federal Air Marshal Service strives to be responsive to its workforce and, when warranted, moves to address valid concerns in an appropriate manner."

Allard released this statement:

"Today it was brought to my attention, by KMGH-TV Channel 7, that there are potentially serious management problems at the Federal Air Marshal Service's Denver office. I will be reviewing Tony Kovaleski's entire report very closely tonight. However, based on excerpts sent to me prior to tonight's report by KMGH-TV, I will be asking for an investigation into the allegations raised by this investigative report. I am determined to work with the Federal Air Marshal Service and the Transportation Security Administration to ensure our airline safety is never in jeopardy."

Sen. Ken Salazar released this statement:

"Protecting the American people is one of my highest priorities as a United States senator. Reports of problems with the Federal Air Marshall Program at Denver International Airport, if true, are disturbing. I will work with the Department of Homeland Security to identify any problems that exist and help solve them as quickly as possible. We must do everything we can to keep our skies, borders, ports and other critical infrastructure safe."

The Federal Air Marshals Service released this statement:

"The Federal Air Marshal Service is committed to safeguarding passengers and crew aboard our nation's commercial aircraft. To that end, we are continuously reviewing our policies and programs to be responsive to an ever-changing security environment and to the needs of our employees. As an organization, the Federal Air Marshal Service strives to be responsive to its workforce and, when warranted, moves to address valid concerns in an appropriate manner."

Question or comment on this story? Have a story idea or news tip? Contact 7NEWS Investigators at 303-832-TIPS or e-mail us.



Copyright 2006 by TheDenverChannel.com.


User currently offlineMoose1226 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 250 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3143 times:

Was sitting in the terminal at DCA waiting to pick someone up last week. I counted at least six men walking in to the airside area through the exit in plain clothes, handing some sort of card to the TSA people guarding the exit, and then proceeding airside. They didn't appear to be wearing IDs like a ramper or gate agent would. Am I correct to assume that these guys were air marshals?

User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3122 times:

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 6):
Sorry, I'm going to go against the grain here - why do FAM's need to be hidden from view anyways? This isn't East Germany after all - we don't need to have "stasi" secret police among us at all times to stay safe. I say put them out there in their uniforms to show potential troublemakers that they're there

Seated, with potential unknown adversaries behind you, is a dismal tactical position if they know who you are.


User currently offlineExFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3110 times:

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 16):
Furthermore, if laymen on this site can identify the FAM's, don't you think terrorists that are well-informed and have done their research will know who it is anyways? Any potential terrorist who would hijack a plane and go through the planning that the 9/11 hijackers did would certainly know who the FAMs were based on the boarding process, etc.

That's the entire point - the FAMs stand out too much now. They need to be able to blend in with the passengers, and right now they can't.

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 13):
Way to not get spotted, silly fascist.

Why would you refer to this marshal as a "fascist"? Do you even know what a "fascist" is? I suspect not, or you wouldn't use it in such a flippant manner.


User currently offlineMham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3645 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3087 times:

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 13):
That's subtle ! Way to not get spotted, silly fascist.

That statement is totally out of line. I would think a person from the continent from which your flag flies would know the definition of a fascist. I also know that that term is a highly charged insult on your continent. From what do you derive this venom towards that marshall?


User currently offlineSPREE34 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 22, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3018 times:

Quoting SA7700 (Reply 7):
When at an airport, I am usually busy trying to spot planes, not marshals...   

How refreshing, someone with their priorities right.



I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 977 posts, RR: 51
Reply 23, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3012 times:

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 6):
Sorry, I'm going to go against the grain here - why do FAM's need to be hidden from view anyways?

I agree... why can't they make them uniformed officers seated at the front of the aircraft infront of the isle leading to the cockpit?

Quoting ExFATboy (Reply 20):
That's the entire point - the FAMs stand out too much now. They need to be able to blend in with the passengers, and right now they can't.

If there's a worry that terrorist would immediatly know which flights do and do not have FAM, hire more!! A balanced budget is obviously no longer a concern of the federal government; if we are to wet our feet with deficet spending on security and defense, we might as well dive-in and do it right...


User currently offlineMham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3645 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2993 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 23):
I agree... why can't they make them uniformed officers seated at the front of the aircraft infront of the isle leading to the cockpit?

Because they'd be the first target and they have the only gun on the plane. A gun is not a great weapon in close quarters and a marshall could be easily overcome in a surprise attack, particularly by multiple attackers.


25 Post contains links and images NAV20 : Just for laughs - interesting that 'sky marshal' has now become 'air marshal'. "Air Marshal' is actually the name for senior ranks (equivalent of gene
26 Superhub : Well..a terrorist could also know who the FAMs are by attempting to charge into the cockpit...see who are the first to stand up to stop him...and the
27 Mham001 : Neutralize him with what? At that point, the terrorist would have lost the element of surprise, and he'd be "in the back of the plane". No duobt the
28 DfwRevolution : What I'm suggesting is a sterile zone at the front of the aircraft. Place all services behind the passengers (be they first class or economy) so that
29 MD11Engineer : Back in the 1980s the British SAS troopers had a similar problem in Northern Ireland while fighting the IRA: In the early 1970s they were looking too
30 AirRyan : I asked a similiar question here about 8 months ago, as I was looking into becoming an Air Marshall but soon found out that all was not exactly going
31 Post contains images AK : You want to talk about FAMs standing out? Here in PHX employees, usually CSA Sups, walk the two of them out onto the ramp, up the stairs of the jetway
32 Dl757md : Yes, some wear this type of outfit but if you think that they all do you are sadly mistaken. It is the exception rather than the rule. I've seen them
33 JGPH1A : I lived in South Africa in the 80's - I know what a fascist is, trust me.
34 HAWK21M : You are dealing with Terrorist not trouble makers. An Air Marshall should board with Pax & should look like a Pax.The Element of Surprise is the Key.
35 CALMSP : to start off with,they can go through securtiy check points just like the rest of us............when you see two guys in suits walk through the exit l
36 Halls120 : You are so correct. The way they act, they might as well be wearing day-glo neon shirts with "I am an Air Marshal!" on the front and back. Could be b
37 Tbird : Just another example of our country’s failed attempt at airline security. I fly every week for biz and a three year old can pick these guys out of a
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Too Easy To Spot Air Marshals? posted Mon May 3 2004 16:27:26 by Mizzou65201
Fars Air, Where Do They Fly? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 16:45:06 by Airevents
Wizz-Air : Where Will They Open New Hubs? posted Sun Jul 23 2006 17:37:31 by Beaucaire
Next Round: Air Canada Vs GDSs Re: Tango Fares posted Tue May 16 2006 07:42:11 by ETStar
Vision Air? Who Are They? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 05:17:35 by F9Animal
2 Air Marshals Plead Guilty To Drug Smuggling posted Tue Apr 4 2006 15:17:13 by KabAir
Air Fares - Should They Be Capped? posted Sat Mar 25 2006 12:16:33 by Drinkstrolley
Exorbitant Air Fares On Some Routes! Too Much! posted Thu Dec 22 2005 20:45:31 by RootsAir
Air India 182 Case Re-opened posted Wed Nov 23 2005 03:34:59 by B741
Kenn Borek Air - How Do They Fly To Antarctica? posted Thu Aug 25 2005 21:03:16 by Vio