Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Youths Oppose MUC Runway: "Prayer For Resistance"  
User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6714 posts, RR: 78
Posted (8 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2855 times:

Via a link on another website I have come across a website of the youth organisation of the Protestant deanery at Freising, located close to Munich Airport.

The organisation is part of the resistance against a third runway at Munich airport and as a contribution they even created a specific prayer. Very tasteless in my opinion, and not surprisingly - far from reality.

Here's a link (German only):
http://www.ej-fs.de/widerstandgebet.html


Translation of certain passages:

"Dear Lord, we call upon you because a third runway is planned to be built.
- We are afraid that nature gets destroyed even more and more kerosene will be blown into the atmosphere.
- We don't understand that the airport wants to expand though still being in debt.
- We are afraid that more living space gets cut and that young people face difficulties in receiving training and finding a job, which help to secure our survival.
- We are speechless because of the wrongfulness that economic growth is rated more valuable than human beings."


Then followed by Psalm 140:

"Deliver me, O Lord, from the evil man: and preserve me from the wicked man.
Who imagine mischief in their hearts: and stir up strife all the day long.
They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent: adders' poison is under their lips.
Keep me, O Lord, from the hands of the ungodly: preserve me from the wicked men, who are purposed to overthrow my goings.
The proud have laid a snare for me, and spread a net abroad with cords: yea, and set traps in my way.
I said unto the Lord, Thou art my God: hear the voice of my prayers, O Lord."



I can understand a new runway faces opposition, but comparing it to "evil man" and whatever is totally ridiculous and could be considered even offensive.
Additionally, these people ignore important facts:

- Without a new runway, holding patterns will increase, causing delays also on the ground, resulting in more kerosene wasted for nothing.
- With new generations of engines and aircraft, traffic will increase without a similar increase of pollution and noise.
- A new runway will increase revenue and debts will decrease faster.
- A new runway will require space, but it won't destroy the "living space" of a whole region.
- Munich airport is a job machine, having created thousands of new jobs over a few years, and a new runway will even increase job opportunities around MUC. The region's unemployment rate is one of the lowest within Germany.
- Economic growth secures jobs and jobs secure people's existance.


My impression is that certain people are simply unwilling to check facts...and others blindly believe what they are told. Of course, alternatives aren't offered either...  Yeah sure


PH


Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1610 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2809 times:

When I lived in Switzerland the same people who opposed aviation had no problem getting on flights to Palma or Ibiza every summer.


smrtrthnu
User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2798 times:

Damn, some people really need a reality check :roll: . Not that it would help them, though.

User currently offlinePlaneHunter From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 6714 posts, RR: 78
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2725 times:

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 1):
When I lived in Switzerland the same people who opposed aviation had no problem getting on flights to Palma or Ibiza every summer.

And there are many people who first move close to an airport and then start opposing pollution and noise...  Yeah sure


PH



Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"New" 747 For Iran Air posted Mon Sep 18 2006 21:54:37 by NA
"OASiSHONGKONG" Ready For Oct Launch. posted Mon Sep 4 2006 19:24:57 by N754PR
Bogus "security" Reason For Limiting Front Lav Use posted Sat Aug 5 2006 19:19:06 by Tugger
R-R Mulls "Three-Shaft" For New Narrowbody Engine posted Mon Jul 10 2006 21:04:13 by Leelaw
"Gunning It" While Turning Onto Runway. posted Mon Jun 19 2006 21:48:40 by 7E72004
6th DEN Runway "Very Important" Officials Say posted Wed May 22 2002 23:50:10 by BA
Why "No Smoking" Still So Prominent In Airlines? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 22:20:33 by Birdwatching
Airbus: "No Plans" To Drop A380 Freighter posted Fri Nov 17 2006 11:02:24 by PanAm_DC10
How Is "Delta Connection" Doing In New England? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 00:27:32 by Cs03
ExpressJet Might Launch An "Independence Air" posted Wed Nov 8 2006 20:08:48 by Planemaker