Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LaGuardia Airport Crunch  
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1815 times:

As more and more airlines add frequencies and routes, one of the world's most congested airports will surely become increasingly dangerous. With runways that are 3,000 ft. shorter than the average 10,000 ft, US Airways, Delta, Continental, and American building up massive amounts of additional frequencies and no room for land expansion, could LaGuardia overtake ORD and EWR as the nation's worst airport for delays?

As a New Yorker and a frequent traveller, I am increasingly worried about LGA. I always felt it was an obsolete and dangerous airport and a major disaster waiting to happen.

What are your thoughts?

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVarsity From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 255 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

When they extended the runway piers by 300 feet to accommodate the A300, I vowed I would not fly in/out of there again.

User currently offlineUAL-777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1730 times:

I agree. I think while the whole regional jet age is proving to be wonderful for the business traveller, they will add significant congestion to ATC, especially at places like LaGuardia. Since they're low-profile and less powerful than the bigger jets, there's less required spacing. The airlines are adding them (especially Continental at LaGuardia) at an amazing rate. The airport is going to be crazy in a few years (it already is to some degree). There's barely enough space on the ramps right now, and there just isn't the land area for such heavy frequencies. I guess we'll just have to see...

User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2282 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1725 times:

I was just going to post the very same topic after seeing yet another announcement of new service.

LGA cannot handle traffic even on a perfect-weather day. I am concerned not only for safety and delays but access to terminals. It is, after all, a small airport by comparison of others with similar traffic. With so many new RJ routes, it goes counter to the trend in SFO of United using larger aircraft but fewer frequencies.

That seems to be needed at LGA -- but as we all know the yields are too high to give up the convienence of all those new flights.




Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineMls737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

Hi,

I completely agree with you ContinentalEWR. A while back I was at LaGuardia and it just took for ever to take off (at least 40 minutes). There were at least 10 other aircrafts in front of us. Late afternoon shuttles are just never on time because they cumulate delays.
I think that LaGuardia becomes a very dangerous airport, because it is not suited for today's traffic.
It's too sad because I kinda like the airport. It's conveniently close to downtown NYC and I don't really like EWR all that much.

mls737


User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1694 times:

No hidden bias here. I love your handle, CoEWR.

User currently offlineMadmax From United States of America, joined May 2000, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1683 times:

Right on Mls737, the location of LGA to the city is anything but perfect, just wish they could have found some better area to build the airport. I always avoid flying out of LGA when i plan trips. American's loads there are amazingly high out of LGA, and all they fly from there are MD-80s!! No offense to all you md fans, but American's MD-80s suck. The close proximity of the bay to the runways always has been a bad omen to me, and with DL flying their 76s out of there something is bound to happen soon.
-MC


User currently offlineExusair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 684 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1677 times:

76's can handle lga with no problem. DL flew L-1011's in there up until this past spring.

User currently offlineMadmax From United States of America, joined May 2000, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1677 times:

Exusair- I know LGA can handle L-1011s and 767s but with increasingly bad weather and traffic something is bound to happen with bigger planes flying into LGA with increasing routes.
-MC


User currently offlineAa777dr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1675 times:

So you guys are saying not to fly out of LGA?

I fly out of LaGuardia alot of times and the only bad thing about it is that the flights get delayed a good 1/2 hour to an hour. I do agree with all the points that have been made here. The last time we took of (TWA MD80) I notice that when the aircraft became airborne the water was about a good 15 - 25 feet below us. Is that normal? I got shit scared. I thought the aircraft was going to go in the water.

Cheers,
Alexander.


User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1666 times:

LaGuardia can accomodate the 767-200/300, L1011, DC10, A300's, and the
new 767-400. It's not the size of the aircraft that's the problem. The problem
lies with the fact that 1). the runways are short, 2). there is limited gate space
at the antiquated central terminal, where all flights other than those operated
by Delta, US Airways, and Northwest operate from 3). there is little room for
taxiway expansion, 4). it is surrounded by water and high density population,
5). it is overcrowded and always has been congested.

LaGuardia Airport is bursting at the seams and in the name of greed, the
airlines are bulking up there to get a sizeable chunk of the NY market. This
is perpetuated by the explosive growth in air travel thanks to the booming
economy, Continental's successful hub at Newark, Delta's ever growing JFK
operations, NY's popularity as a business, convention, and tourist destination,
and the fact that the Port Authority and FAA have neglected to modernize and
equip LGA with the necessary foundation upon which to operate such a busy
schedule.

At any time of the day, a taxi to the runway lasts from 25 to 65 minutes or
more. Gate space is short. I cannot believe the FAA, NTSB, and the City of
New York are just ignoring this. There is the potential for a serious disaster.
I hope that will not be their wake up call.



User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

I cannot believe that the FAA and the City of New York are continually ignoring the problems at LGA. On recent trips to the East Coast of the USA I have had the misfortune on several occaisions of flying out of / into LGA. (I fly to the USA several times a year on business from Sydney.)

The first time I was delayed I thought "It's just one of those things" but each and every time I have been there the delays have been terrible. A local told me at one stage that "this isn't a delay, you haven't seen a delay". As for the airport being dangerous, I tend to agree that as more and more traffic accumulates there will be problems. It's a sad situation that will only ever be fixed after there has been a major accident.

I will never fly in or out of that airport again.

mb


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8037 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

I think the state of New York ought to seriously look at building a fourth major airport to relieve the congestion at JFK, LGA and EWR.

My suggestion is to build an all-new airport out of the old airport(s) used by Grumman Aerospace on Long Island that will connect back into NYC using a high-speed rail link and "limousine bus" link. That way, LGA traffic can be limited only to BOS-LGA-DCA shuttle flights and/or a limited number of flights flown by regional jets. Secondly, this new airport will become the new long-distance domestic flight airport in and out of the NYC area, so JFK can concentrate on international flights.

EWR will keep its tenant airline status (more or less), given that Continental has a major hub operation there.

It's likely this new airport--if ever approved and built--will become a major hub for Southwest and JetBlue operations in the NYC metropolitan area.


User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1623 times:

I think that LGA should ban all RJ flights, and put on a restriction similar to DAL/Wright Amendment, but reversed. All flights will have to hold at least a certain # of pax-like 100-125. But if an airline doesn't have a 100 pax. or more plane(ex.-Legend), then it'll be the largest plane that they have.

User currently offlineSurf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1621 times:

I've never had to use LGA because all I fly are the JFK-LAX/SFO flights, out of NYC. Thank Goodness.

User currently offlineAerLingus From China, joined Mar 2000, 2371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

Whenever I go to New York to visit my Dad, I always fly an American Super 80 from DFW to LGA. Someone said that AA's MD-80s suck but I must disagree. I really like them alot.

The only New York airport I have ever flown into is La Guardia.



Get your patchouli stink outta my store!
User currently offlineAirCanadaSFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1608 times:

Does anybody think that it's the end of the world if a flight takes 25-30 minutes from pushback to liftoff? Moreover, does anybody think that LaGuardia is the only place where that's normal?

If proximity to water, densely populated areas, and high traffic are criteria for closing airports, then I think just about every airport that serves a coastal city would be closed.

I think we'll be seeing this for a long time to come.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Thomas D. Mayes, Jr.



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Thomas D. Mayes, Jr.



GO BEARS!

P


User currently offlinePilot1113 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2333 posts, RR: 11
Reply 17, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

I believe that NYC should look towards ISP as a possible reliever airport to the mess that's NY's airport system.

Southwest has already found ISP to be a NYC entrance.

- Neil Harrison


User currently offlineAirborne From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

AirCanadaSFO apparently hasn't transited through LaGuardia and doesn't appreciate the seriousness
of the problem.

Rather than ban RJ's, I would severely curtail the
number of flights to secondary cities. LGA should
be used for ORD, DFW, IAH, ATL, BOS, DCA, and
all other high frequency markets. Birmingham AL
can be served from JFK.



User currently offlineAerLingus From China, joined Mar 2000, 2371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

I agree with Airborne.
In addition, I think that the Port Authority needs to make mass transit more favorable for travel to and from JFK/EWR. After all, look at Hong Kong's Chek Lap Kok airport. They have high speed rail lines from Hong Kong island directly to the airport.



Get your patchouli stink outta my store!
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 20, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1571 times:

Whoa!!!!!! Wait a minute......if you limit LGA to destinations in top US business centers and cities like Chicago, Dallas/Ft.Worth, Houston, Miami, and so forth, the cost of flying will rise sharply. You can't turn LGA into a business traveller's
airport. That's not a solution. That is skirting around the problem.

What needs to be done is to limit the growth/addition of new flights until the
ATC system is updated with software and technology to cope with growth. The
City should invest heavily in fast, mass transit to JFK, where pockets of times
during the day, 11:00a-2:00p and early morning are optimal for adding flights
as JFK is not really congested until the evening rush hour of flights to Europe.

ISP is too far from NYC to make it a viable alternative to LGA and it sits in the
middle of suburbia. There would be severe resistance to growth at ISP beyond
a certain number of flights. However, Stewart Airport in Newburgh, NY and some
of NJ's other small airports (Teterboro comes to mind) and perhaps the expansion of LGA into the bay (after all, CLK was built on reclaimed land) is
an option). Aside from infrastructure, the real problem is technology. The FAA is a dinosaur and needs to start thinking of real solutions to the problem of gridlock.



User currently offlinePacific From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1075 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

After reading all this I'm wondering about the function of Teterboro Airport. It's north of EWR and is closer to Manhatton than EWR! I'm wondering the prospects of the smallest jets landing there. (717, DC9, 737 etc.)

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LaGuardia Airport Crunch posted Thu Sep 7 2000 13:28:50 by ContinentalEWR
Newport News Airport Tops Norfolk For LaGuardia-bo posted Thu Dec 22 2005 23:27:10 by LesMainwaring
LaGuardia International Airport posted Mon Sep 29 2003 21:27:37 by Levg79
Employees Jumping The Airport Security Line posted Tue Dec 19 2006 18:50:44 by B777-700
Free Airport Parking For Disabled Vets Etc... posted Mon Dec 18 2006 06:31:33 by Longhornmaniac
East Midlands Airport Renamed posted Sat Dec 16 2006 19:52:28 by Ringway
Create Your Own 3 Letter Code Airport Shirt! posted Sat Dec 16 2006 09:19:05 by Lfutia
Airline/Airport/Maintenance Customer Service posted Sat Dec 16 2006 08:50:49 by Zvocio79
LH Sues Hahn Airport For Payments To Ryanair posted Fri Dec 15 2006 16:40:49 by PlaneHunter
UK Government To Press For Airport Expansions posted Thu Dec 14 2006 10:43:31 by Zarniwoop