Avion From Bouvet Island, joined May 1999, 2205 posts, RR: 8 Posted (13 years 3 months 3 days ago) and read 1813 times:
Some of the people here always praise the beautiful 777 interior. Because of that i was really looking forward to my first 777 flight and thought that it would be way above the A340. But after my flight with BA i found out that the 777 is equally comfortable to the 340 and found this revolutionary interior non existant. I mean, what is the big deal with making some curves into the ceiling?
Apart from that nothing really is different.
USAirways737 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1026 posts, RR: 1 Reply 2, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1650 times:
It isnt just curves in the ceiling. It is flexibility in seating and lavs and galleys. I mean on what other plane could you have 1x2x1, 2x2x2, 2x3x2, 2x4x2, 3x3x3, and even 3x4x3 seating configs, and all be comfy? It was even the first plane to win an award for the interior. So if you didnt notice and big difference on the inside then you werent looking hard enough.
JumboClassic From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 315 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1637 times:
I hate saying this, but I also was somewhat disappointed after my first 777 flight with CO in January. Not the interior that much, but I was expecting a whole new experience which turned out to be like any other Boeing widebody. I haven't flown on an A330/340, so I can't compare.
Teahan From Belgium, joined Nov 1999, 5275 posts, RR: 62 Reply 4, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1613 times:
On my trip to Thailand I took my first 777 (777 300) flight with Thai. It was from Phuket to Bangkok. It was only 1 hour and 20 minutes and I must say I loved every minute of it. Ok the seats, lavoratories, etc are the same as any other planes (exept the overhead bins which are much much much bigger). 4 hours later I took Swissair to Zurich. Even though I was flying C Class on the SR MD11 and economy on Thai, I felt it was more spacious on the Thai B777. 2 months ago I hated the B777 (maybe beacuse I am european)
This summer I flew on the B777 and the B767 for the first time. I must say that I am nearly a convert. I am looking forward to what Airbus has in store with the new interior of the A340 500 & 600.
Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
AT From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 901 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1590 times:
One real plus about the 777 is that the cabin is not claustrophobic, and you don't feel you're in a tunnel.
Plus I am very tall, and for people over 6 feet the 777 is definitely THE way to go, because the cabin height is so generous, and the overhead bins are completely unobtrusive. The A330/340 cabin has a more "tunnel" feel, and the overhead bins take up cabin space.
Phileo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1464 times:
I agree in the sense that the interior of the B777 is really nice. The overhead bin is really large. But one of the weakness of the bin is, you must be very careful when you open the bin because you might be hit by the stuff stored in the bin. Another thing I notice about the B777 overhead bin was, it tends to easily open during take off and put the passager on risk. On the most recent flight with SQ from KUL--SIN and SIN--PER, both with B772, one of the overhead bin suddently opened during take off and there was nothing you could do about it (unless you remove your seatbelt). Passagers below those open bin was struggling to close it during take off and cabin crew couldn't do anything with it. I couldn't imagine what will happended during strong turbulance. Anyway, maybe Boeing need to do something with it.
VH-OJO From Slovakia, joined Jan 2000, 238 posts, RR: 1 Reply 8, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1459 times:
If you think that 777 is "THE way to go for people over 6 feet tall" try a Delta 777 across Atlantic in coach and you will never want to fly that plane again. The 777 are wonderful, in my opinion, but Delta coach seating on that plane stinks big time.
Ruscoe From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1471 posts, RR: 2 Reply 9, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1458 times:
My 18 year old daughter has been travelling around the world, and doesn't know or care much which airplane she flies on.( No, you can't have her phone number.)
Anyway, the point is without any prompting or encouragement from me, she offered that the best aircraft she had been on was from Brisbane to Singapore. It was a 777.
She has been on a lot of different aircraft over the years, doesn't know one airplane from the other and has no allegence to any manufacturer, so I thought this was a particularly pertinent comment.
RIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1785 posts, RR: 1 Reply 11, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1403 times:
I didn't expect anything outstanding (it is still an aircraft interior, nothing more ), but liked it very much. But those 772LR and 773LR with overhead crew rest areas will apparently lose this spacious cabin. Am I correct?
... today I unexpectedly had a ride on a new subway train. Very nice looking from outside, great interior - light, nice, with route display showing current train location - like what I saw in Europe or even better, and what a contrast to a dirty NY subway stations! (Sorry for this non aviation related addition - but it was really very impressive! )
CV880 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1043 posts, RR: 2 Reply 12, posted (13 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1398 times:
Boeing is offering the curvy 777 interior on the 767 nowadays and based on pix I think the design is much better suited to the smaller-diameter cabin. Of course, I have to wait for a ride on the 767-400 to pass final judgment. There is a new Lauda series -300 with the new cabin and CO's 767-200s will be so equipped (that'll be interesting).
I have flown both the 777 and the A340 series and I find the Airbus lighting and overall ambiance to be superior, though there's no denying the attractiveness of the 777's integrated center bins and wider seats.
Klmd11 From Netherlands, joined Sep 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 15, posted (13 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1323 times:
I don't see anything very special about the 777 interior either, mostly just that it is curved and there is slightly more space on the sides. I find that this interior has however many problems, namely that seven of the eight 777 flights that I have been on (on CO, AF, and BA) the overhead bins have opened at takeoff. I seriously doubt that this could be just bad luck. In my experience, the plane also shakes very much at takeoff, during which the interior gives the impression of being very rickety, with ceiling panels showing large (4-5cm?) separations and squeaking a lot. Overall, I find the plane to be ok, however not the revolution in air travel that it is often touted as.
USAirways737 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1026 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (13 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1318 times:
Go to http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/777x-launch/777x.html
The link to Unlimited oppurtunities is at the bottom of the page. It is a PDF file so you'll have to have Adobe Acrobat. It shows a pic of the 777 vs the A330. Youll see all the diiference in bin and ceiling heights. You'll also see all the space available up top. It doesnt say that you wont have to take space from the main deck for the crew rest like i thought but i remember reading it somewhere on Boeing.com. However the pilots crew rest will because of the lower level of their rest area.
Jrlander From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1102 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (13 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1283 times:
On a recent trip to the middle east, I flew on both an AA 777 and a Gulf Air A330-200. While the A330 wise very comfortable, I have to say that I really preferred the interior of the 777. The A330's overhead bins are not recessed into the ceiling of the aircraft as they are on the 777. For me, that gave the 777 a much greater sense of space. In addition, there is no direct lighting in the 777. It is all indirect. The lights, by which I mean the cabin lights not the reading lights, are hidden. The cabin is lit by that light reflecting off the ceiling or off the walls. It gives it a very different feeling. The Airbus has flourescent lights that run down the middle. The amount of of flourescent light, which really gives me headaches, reminded me of a hospital ward. What was worse was that Gulf Air didn't dim them the entire 7 hour flight from London to Bahrain.