EK156 From United Arab Emirates, joined May 2005, 765 posts, RR: 3 Posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3901 times:
Since we all know that EK has ordered 43 frames of the whale. A one year delay has totally thrown EK's expansion plan offtrack!!! Alot of their scheduled New Destinations will be postponed until they have enough equipment!!
So how do you think this will affect EK's expansion as a whole? Is it only a one year delay or will EK lease or buy 77W's to cover for the lack of planes? Will they go ahead with their new destinations knowing that some of them are in North and South America?
Dutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3889 times:
The A380 situation is a big issue for the type's biggest customer, EK, and there is no doubt that the EK management is reviewing all of its options at this very moment and trying to come up with a comprehensive plan to compensate for the delayed delivery of its A380s.
Expect the following:
1. The introduction of new destinations will be delayed in some cases. Also, there was some talk that EK would use some of the A380s for a high capacity, lower fare long haul carrier.....these plans are probably on hold for the near term future.
2. EK will hold on to its aircraft for longer periods than might have originally been expected; many expected EK to begin rationalizing its fleet with some 772As and the leased in A343s expected to be among the first EK aircraft to be retired. Due to the A380 situation, these aircraft are going nowhere for the time being.
3. EK may be working with leasing companies to see what aircraft may be available in the near-term future - however, there is probably not much available.
4. EK will recieve some type of compensation from Airbus - it will be interesting to see a revised A380 delivery schedule.
Longer term, there is the issue of the EK A346s that no one seems to be talking about.....EK chose to delay delivery of those aircraft, now Airbus is again delaying the delivery of the A380s.....so what is the result? While the two issues are not directly related, both situations involve Airbus and EK, and the fact is that EK will be receiving far fewer aircraft from Airbus in the coming years, so discussions must be going on. This can go any which way.
And, there is the EK and the 787 or A350/70 situation.....and how will the A380 situation affect that competition? We could see EK follow SQ and place an order for the 787 very quickly, or will Airbus try to take a whole bunch of negatives and try to land EK as the launch customer for the new and improved A3-something? You can almost hear the discussions.....Airbus saying to EK: look, we screwed up with the A380 deliveries, the A350 was not a great offering, and the A346 is going nowhere......give us another chance, EK, and lets wipe the slate clean - why dont you order 50 A350/70s and we will let you out of your A346 committment, and give you double compensation for the A380 delay that you can use for as a deposit toward the new A350/70 airplanes, and we will give you a 50% launch customer discount for the A350/70s...we all win!!!
CO737800 From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 545 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3871 times:
"You can almost hear the discussions.....Airbus saying to EK: look, we screwed up with the A380 deliveries, the A350 was not a great offering, and the A346 is going nowhere......give us another chance"
..., and you can almost hear the answer as well I think.
"Well that's certainly an interesting offer, but quite honestly we're not interested in being a launch customer for another Airbus product at this time. The delays in the A380 program have caused us to completely revise our fleet acquisition and expansion plans and we're not willing to risk similar problems with our mid-size sector. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to catch a flight for a meeting in Seattle."
With the delay in aircraft deliveries, the A346s could be an expedient way to expand the fleet temporarily. What is the current delivery time for 77Ws vs the A346? The A346s bad fuel economics could potentially be offset by a very sweet "mea culpa" deal from Airbus.
JayinKitsap From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3762 times:
I had a hard time tracking down the source but my recollection of original schedule of deliveries (before the 1st delay and production along with the current Airbus schedule announced on the 13th is:
Original Revised Shortfall
First Delivery April 06 Dec 06
Production 2006 8 1 -7
Production 2007 28 9 -19
Production 2008 28 19 -9
Production 2009 28 23 -5
Airbus was discussing a 4 per month production rate or 48 per year by around 2009.
So the 30th plane delivered moved from 4Q 07 to 1Q 09 18 months late
By the end of 2009 there were originally 92 expected to be delivered, now it is 52 delivered, a 40 plane shortfall and the rate in 2010 will probably be 28 not 48 planes. So the 100th plane will be late by almost 2 years.
Quoting Mham001 (Reply 10): Whats getting missed is that it's not just a one year delay. Thats only for the first plane. As I understand it, many of the later planes will be delayed for years.
I must admit that I did not fully comprehend this very very important point - in situations such as this, the manufacturer usually tries to "catch up" to compensate for initial delays, that is not the case here.
The continued delivery delays is likely far more critical to the airlines than the initial EIS delay.
Ken777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8478 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3652 times:
It looks like it might be Boeing's turn in the sun for EK.
First the 787-10's formally announced an ordered next month to start the air show off with a bang.
Then some 777s to fill the most pressing needs.
For the longer term the 748i looks to be just as good as the 380 for New Destinations and EK can probably start getting deliveries before they get the first half of their original order.
In terms of reducing orders from Airbus, I would bet that there are some attractive cancellation clauses in the agreement as well as some attractive compensation clauses. EK can take care of "excess" 380s (those that would be delivered too far down the line) as well as 346s with Airbus probably still having to pay some compensation on delivery and performance guarantees.
I believe that EK now has an open field to play on and will use this to determine what is best for them. The 787 looks very good, the 777 (if decent slots are available) will be attractive. That leaves the 380. It's lost a bit of it's shine and the 748i has been polished up pretty well. I think anything is possible with EK today.
Sllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3513 times:
Quoting EK156 (Thread starter): So how do you think this will affect EK's expansion as a whole?
I think EK's expansion has already cooled -- thus the previous leasing of some aircraft (to 9W) and the deferral of the A346's. Thus, despite the strong words, it's not clear these delays will do anything but allow EK to reduce their A380 order to 'right size' it.
Carpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2978 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3386 times:
Perhaps EK is lining up for a bid to AC's A343/A345s when they start taking 777s starting next year.
Otherwise, there is almost a non-existing market for second-hand A340/A332/777s with powerplants favorable to its existing fleet.
EurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3357 times:
Quoting Sllevin (Reply 16): I think EK's expansion has already cooled -- thus the previous leasing of some aircraft (to 9W) and the deferral of the A346's. Thus, despite the strong words, it's not clear these delays will do anything but allow EK to reduce their A380 order to 'right size' it.
I don't think EK's expansion has cooled. If you look at the past few years, they've consistently added 4 to 5 new destinations per year, mix of regional and long haul routes.
So far, there is no indications of a slow down in the number of new destinations added. As a matter of fact, the delayed A380s will mean other smaller aircraft originally planned to be freed up for new destinations (330s, 340s, 777s) will remain busy, thus constraining Emirates' growth and potentially costing the airline billions of dollars in lost revenue over the 2006-2010 period.