Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air France Legal Action Against Ryanair  
User currently offlineCedars747 From Norway, joined Dec 2005, 2721 posts, RR: 19
Posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 3510 times:

Air France has lodget a complaint with French civil court Conseil D'etat against Marseille Provence Airport's new low-cost terminal,which is to became
a base for Ryanair in 2006
Ryanair desided to open a base at Marseille after the Airport launched a USD 19.1 million project to redevelop it's existing freight facility into a low-cost terminal.The carrier plans to base two aircraft at the airport as of November 2006 and open 13 new routes.
Air France sees that with this type of practice,low-cost airlines are being financed by general companies.Whereas,Ryanair declared it will now file a further complaint against Air France with the European commission on the basis of an abuse of dominance under European competision rules,in addition to the airport fees complaints it lodget with regulators in May 2006
Alex!!!


Tengo una pasion por la aviacion !لدي شغف للطيران !I have a passion for aviation !
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3479 times:

Air France did not complain when the french tax-payers had to bail them out in the late 80's for 10 billion FF.....
All due respect for the great company in Paris,but they live a little bit too long in an extremely protected envirenment and should learn to accept some needed competition.They offer literally no direct european flights from Marseille-so where's the problem ????

[Edited 2006-06-18 20:49:54]


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineSmokeyrosco From Ireland, joined Dec 2005, 2112 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3429 times:

This has been posted before also.


John Hancock
User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3425 times:

The airports should be doing whatever they can to reduce the costs of ALL airlines, If Marseille can give a break to FR, they most certainly can give a break to AF, BA, etc, etc.

I believe the complaint is not against Ryanair, but agains the airport.


User currently offlineAirNZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3234 times:

Quoting ANother (Reply 3):
The airports should be doing whatever they can to reduce the costs of ALL airlines, If Marseille can give a break to FR, they most certainly can give a break to AF, BA, etc, etc.

I disagree in that it is specifically a Low-Cost terminal.......and if AF, BA or any other wish to fly from it they would be entitled to the same benefits as FR. It's exactly the same concept as the new LCT at Singapore Changi which was exclusively designed and meant for LCC's.
This is typical Air France though.....happily accept govt subsidies for years, but complain/take legal action when something doesn't suit them financially.


User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3163 times:

Nothing prevents Air France to shift it's Marseille - Paris shuttle service to the new low-cost terminal and enjoy the same lower tariff's...


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineBlueFlyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4179 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3131 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 5):

Other than being "newer," is there anything specific about this new terminal that makes it better suited to LCCs ? I can't imagine what it would be, but I thought I'd ask.



I've got $h*t to do
User currently offlineRJ100 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2000, 4126 posts, RR: 29
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 3091 times:

Low cost carriers benefit from a different (lower) tariff because they need less services (no docks etc.). But this is not everything. If an airport has more passengers, it can split its general costs much better. In fact, also the legacy carriers benefit from that in the end.

The European commission clearly stated that airports are allowed to offer a reduced tariff to certain customers who generate a certain volume. The European commission supports low fare airlines and they support that airports want to use unused airport facilities (if you don't use them the tax payer simply needs to pay for it anyway...).

Face the truth, Air France is just bitching against the low fare carriers because they fear competition- an airline which failed to offer direct and affordable flights from Marseille and all the other places other than Paris and Lyon.

Regards,
RJ100



none
User currently offlinePihero From France, joined Jan 2005, 4672 posts, RR: 77
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 3043 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The diligent from Beaucaire strikes again !
And with the same arguments :subsidies and government help and dominant position...etc...Wonder why you never raised the conditions of BA's privatisation or never bitched on the Chapter 11 which serves most of the US airlines and distorts the competition ?
As for competition, Air France does not "fear " Ryanair or its likes. The competition is the TGV as a few have discovered to their detriment (and by the way, I've never heard you complain about the way the TGV is subsidised,either).
just take a look at the AF results summary and future plans (adopted and accepted by all shareholders) and you'll see the fallacy of your argument.
But I think that's too much asking from you.



Contrail designer
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 2992 times:

Quoting Pihero (Reply 8):
But I think that's too much asking from you.

I do not complain about the TGV infrastructure because each country has an obligation to provide basic road and rail infrastructure to it's citizens.
That this infrastructure is paid by tax-payers money seems legitimate.
TGV is indeed a great competitor for Air France domestic flights (and flights to London or Brussles ) but the issue is not exclusively tied to the TGV offer.
Airports like Marseille,Nice ,Montpellier or Bordeaux have quite a good offer on Air France flights to Paris (ORY and CDG) but no good and competetive flights to other european destinations .The principe of feeding a hub is logic and makes sense for Air France to fill their planes .But when I have to fly first one hour up north to Paris,change plane,fly back another two hours south from Paris to Madrid instead of flying directly from Montpellier or Marseille to Madrid- it's an expensive way to transport passengers.
Hub operations are fully justified and neccessary to fill long-haul networks and longer medium-distance flight ! Fully agreed on this -but short,close neighbour-country flights are useless if the hubfeeder-flight is longer than the direct flight.
The low-costs do develop passenger streams that were inexistant before and do it point to point-which obviously attracts the passengers since they save time and money.
Bordeaux has since two years a service called "porte iberique" with flights to Spain and Portugal which is a positive developpement but not enough and to focussed on Spain exclusively.
Who would have though there would be demand for flights from say -Charleroi to Nîmes...???? Now all the flights on Ryanair are full and passengers pay more than just the famous 29 € plus taxes -the average yield on these new routes would indicate there is room for Air France to introduce economically viable fights to province-towns.But you don't want to do it because it does not fit your business -model . So let others do it without complaining about airport charges!
And what is true for Nîmes is also true for Marseille.
So Since Air France never would think of putting up new liaisions between say MRS and DUB or MRS and IST- what's the problem ?
And the argument that Air France is offering also low-fare tickets is true and false- true in the proper sense that if you book well ahead in time and stay long enough (over weekend) you get cheap tickets to european destinations.
But try tickets within the same week-without saturday night- you end up with ridicoulous fares.
You seem not to accept any critic towards Air France since you are most likely flying for them- great -I have never ever critizised Air France for their lack of performance,service ,safety or management - but I do critizise them for their attitude against anything that comes even close to challenge their thurst for monopoly in french airtransport.
Lufthansa which is in a similar dominant position in Germany, has no problem with accepting competing airlines in Germany .



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1937 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2866 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Smokeyrosco (Reply 2):
This has been posted before also.

To me that's more annoying than seeing a topic discussed again.



The only valid opinions are those based in facts
User currently offlineAbrelosojos From Venezuela, joined May 2005, 5130 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2725 times:

Quoting Pihero (Reply 8):
And with the same arguments :subsidies and government help and dominant position...etc...Wonder why you never raised the conditions of BA's privatisation or never bitched on the Chapter 11 which serves most of the US airlines and distorts the competition ?

= Irrelevant to the discussion at hand. BEAUCAIRE was responding to current topic at hand and brings up excellent and valid points.

Cheers,
A.



Live, and let live.
User currently offlinePihero From France, joined Jan 2005, 4672 posts, RR: 77
Reply 12, posted (8 years 6 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2641 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

To the diligent from Beaucaire :
Funny how in the same breath you can open a real insight into a situation and close it through prejudice-blindness :
The only threat Ryanair would pose for Air France will be for the trans-Med traffis, i.e. between france and north Africa.And that's where the fight is going to be.
As for liaisons between Provence-Côte d'Azur and the spanish riviera, you're just dreaming, these two regions offer basically the same opprtunities and services and I don't see for the foreseeable future an airline opening that sort of traffic.
now for the subsidies.So it's ok to subsidise the TGV but not air connections ? Strange reasoning, especially after I saw some posts about public service obligations, in France or in Italy...
And please, don't play the innocent : Charleroi-Nîmes is a misnomer for Brussels-Marseille, though i agree that LCCs have opened a brand new market for air travel

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 9):
And the argument that Air France is offering also low-fare tickets is true and false- true in the proper sense that if you book well ahead in time and stay long enough (over weekend) you get cheap tickets to european destinations.
But try tickets within the same week-without saturday night- you end up with ridicoulous fares.

The same argument goes for everybody, including Ryanair. just for sheer curiosity, I made a booking search for July between Paris and Marseille, tried for some four weeks'notice (Ryanair clients do that regularly) and lo and behold, the AF offers were on the 17 JUl week 48 euros. the return flights were at 49 € everyday except on Sunday when it is at 66€.
So much for ridiculous fares.And by the way, AF don't add taxes on these prices.And they don't ask the airports to pay for their advertising or a fee for each passenger they carry.
And while we're on this subject, yes, I do resent that irish airline pisking up pax traffic in this country just because they are operating in a legal void : no taxes, no social charges, no professional obligation for cabin crew licences.... very easy, isn't it ? I have a lot more respect for EasyJet who play the rules.
So please don't lecture me on fair competition, that word sounds here like an obscenity.



Contrail designer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BAA Legal Action Against Ryanair posted Wed Jul 21 2004 21:10:13 by Ba319-131
Air-India Mulls Legal Action Against Airbus posted Sun May 1 2005 00:37:55 by MrComet
Tans B732 Crash: Legal Action Against Boeing posted Sun Sep 11 2005 11:52:36 by Breiz
FLYi May Take Legal Action Against AirTran posted Fri Feb 25 2005 14:59:41 by PlaneGuy27
BAW Launches Legal Action Against Amex posted Wed Jun 12 2002 00:04:44 by Singapore_Air
Air France : War Against Marseille LCC Terminal posted Wed May 31 2006 12:24:34 by Beaucaire
Lawsuit Filed Against Air France posted Sat Aug 6 2005 19:17:47 by Yeggerman
Air Canada Creditors/Unions Mull Legal Action posted Tue Nov 11 2003 22:11:33 by Canadi>nBoy
Air France Codeshare With Nationwide + Bangkok Air posted Thu Dec 14 2006 23:16:45 by Jimyvr
Air France To Agadez Question posted Thu Dec 14 2006 07:18:08 by AirAmericaC46