Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why So Many AS MD-80's In FAI?  
User currently offlineFlyingNanook From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 830 posts, RR: 12
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4525 times:

Hi all,
This summer I've noticed an odd trend with Alaska Airlines at FAI. For some reason, they've brought 5 daily MD-80's up here (That's 1/3 of the AS flights up here). It used to be that the MD-80 was uncommon up here, maybe one daily in summer and none in the winter. I'm used to seeing a good mix of Alaska's 737's, but this many MD-80's is odd to me.

Anybody know why Alaska decided to send so many MD-80's up here? I know some of it has to do with retiring the 732 and sending the 734 off to get redone into combis, but that shouldn't be whole reason.


Semper ubi sub ubi.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlywithken From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 223 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 4450 times:

Perhaps the recent decision to send nothing but 737's on all of the Mexico routes have given them the abundance of MD's to use up in the states.

User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4408 times:

I think it has alot to do with using the 734, 73G, 738 & 739 more in the lower 48. Using the M83 more in the State of Alaska is a good move.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineHikesWithEyes From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 816 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4347 times:

Because the MDs have a lower reliability rate, the decision was made
to restrict them to a certain number of stations to improve the operation
during the hectic summer schedule.
That way (in theory) you can keep more spare parts on hand in those stations
for when the aircraft has a mechanical problem.
You typically wont see the MD in FAI during the winter because of de-icing
hassles...takes longer to do them than the 737 family.



First, benzene in my Perrier, and now this!
User currently offlineHikesWithEyes From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 816 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4333 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 2):
Using the M83 more in the State of Alaska is a good move.

I am not in agreement with that. The SEA/ANC and SEA/FAI flights have
really full passenger loads, and they take a lot of bags. The 737 can carry
more. Also, of 26 MD80s, several have lower takeoff weights (149.5K lbs)
and 5 have auxiliary fuel tanks, which limit the amount of bags that can be
loaded, so bags end up getting left behind.



First, benzene in my Perrier, and now this!
User currently offlineFlyingNanook From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 830 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4270 times:

Quoting HikesWithEyes (Reply 3):
Because the MDs have a lower reliability rate, the decision was made
to restrict them to a certain number of stations

Well, I guess this shows what Alaskans knew all along: AS really doesn't care about us. (Before anybody flames me, I'm being sarcastic)

One other thing that I noticed is that ANC isn't seeing the same buildup of MD-80's because nearly all of theirs are on the FAI-ANC-SEA route. The other ANC-SEA routes are on 737's and mostly not originating in FAI.

One other observation from my flight up here a couple weeks ago. Because of the addition of MD-80's to FAI, a lot of pilots are making their way up to Alaska for the first time. I heard the captain commenting about that in the terminal, and in flight, we took a scenic route around Denali because it was the first officer's first trip to Alaska and Denali was surprisingly cloud free. That was the first time I flew to the east of Denali, then circled back around to fly up to the west of it too. Come to think of it, it's the first time I ever flew to the west of Denali.



Semper ubi sub ubi.
User currently offlineHikesWithEyes From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 816 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4265 times:

Quoting FlyingNanook (Reply 5):
Well, I guess this shows what Alaskans knew all along: AS really doesn't care about us. (Before anybody flames me, I'm being sarcastic)

It is a well known fact that we care most about FAI.

 goodvibes 

Quoting FlyingNanook (Reply 5):
we took a scenic route around Denali because it was the first officer's first trip to Alaska

While nice for the passengers, that is not so great for on-time performance
or revenue since the price of fuel is so high.



First, benzene in my Perrier, and now this!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why So Many Good Looking Aircraft In The Deserts. posted Wed Sep 1 2004 03:32:33 by Haan
AS MD-80 In "Kindergarten Cop"?!?!?!? posted Sun Apr 18 2004 09:04:47 by N730AS
How Many DC-9/MD-80 In Africa? posted Thu Feb 6 2003 20:22:40 by 717fan
Why So Many MD-80 Powerbacks At DFW? posted Wed Jan 7 2004 05:11:32 by Ssides
Why So Many DC-8s As Frieghters? posted Tue Sep 5 2006 21:52:06 by Falstaff
US Airlines To HAM: Why So Many In 80s But Not Now? posted Fri Apr 14 2006 23:05:15 by Kkfla737
Why So Many New Colored NW Planes In Desert posted Sat Jan 28 2006 19:50:20 by JMO-777
AS MD-80 With Hole In Fuselage posted Wed Dec 28 2005 02:10:20 by 3DoorsDown
Why So Many Buses In CDG? posted Sun Aug 28 2005 23:39:43 by YoungFlyer
FAI Why So Many Aircraft? Google Earth Image posted Thu Aug 18 2005 15:12:34 by Squirrel83