Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is The A3XX Now The A350?  
User currently offlineAvion757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1084 times:

You'll excuse me for appearing behind the times, but is the A3XX now designated A350?
Thank you!
Alex

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDelta777-XXX From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1017 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1027 times:

Alex, Airbus will probably call it the A3XX... that is what everyoen is calling it... and if they change it... people will still say A3XX. I'd bet money they call it the A3XX.      

User currently offlineWidebody From Ireland, joined Aug 2000, 1152 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 982 times:

...at present, it is staying A3XX.......

User currently offlineAussieERJ145 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 978 times:

The Aircraft will probably become the A350 when there are firm orders recieved from launch customers.
At present there are only expressions of interest.
One news paper even said it would be called the A380!
But that was probably a mistake.
In any case it is common Airbus practice to designate a new aircraft A3XX. Just like the A340 was known as the A3XX until it's launch.


User currently offlineWidebody From Ireland, joined Aug 2000, 1152 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 961 times:

...Airbus has accepted that the name A3XX has become too familiar to be changed.....no new aircraft can really use the digits A3XX again.......imagine a new A317 being designated then A3XX.......first a 950 seater A3XX, then a 95 seater one....too difficult for the public to understand.....this is what they feel at present anyway.....

User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 957 times:

I think it would be very stupid to keep the "name" A 3XX, this no name. All former projekts had at first the designation A 3xx.

User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Reply 6, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 942 times:

Paris Match (a French magasine that had a feature article on the A3XX a few months ago) stated that it will be called the A380. The number 8 is the good luck number in Asia where Airbus hopes most of the clients will come from!

Jeremiah Teahan



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineSamurai 777 From Canada, joined Jan 2000, 2458 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 922 times:

Not so to the Japanese at least. To them, almost any even number does not spell good luck. Generally, it's any odd number like 1, 3, 5 and 7 and so on that they believe is good luck. To actually bring a gift to a Japanese in sets of 2 or 4 items, for example, will offend them and could set things off on the wrong foot!

Frankly, it's crazy for the A3XX would be called the A380. It's just not common sense. There isn't such a thing as an A360 or A370 built or even designed yet! If it was called the A380, then a future "A360/370" family, whatever the a/c will look like, might not sell nearly as well, for customers, especially those in Asia might view the "A360/370" as inferior products!

If this sounds nuts, look at how McDonnell Douglas had to change the designation DC-10-20 to the DC-10-40 because the DC-10-30 was already built. JAL and Northwest wouldn't buy this aircraft unless McDonnell Douglas changed the designation. You have to think about the first impressions any manufacturers have make on any product they sell such as cars and food products. Airlines and commercial aircraft are no different.

So it's most likely to be called the A350. BTW, the A3XX was once referred to as the A2000 in the past, when Airbus was just getting started on designing the A3XX.

The A330/340 was never called the A3XX in the initial design phase. The A330 was actually referred to as the TA-11 and the A340 the TA-12 when they were first designed in the 1980s.

Samurai 777


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is The A3XX Now Called The A350 ? posted Tue Aug 31 1999 21:33:58 by Vctony
What Is The Cost Of A Dead A350? posted Wed Jul 19 2006 08:11:27 by Art
What Is Happening With The A350? posted Sun Mar 20 2005 14:03:46 by Art
Is There A Market For The A3XX? posted Mon Jul 31 2000 22:49:05 by Modesto2
Air France Is The 3rd Customer Of The A3XX! posted Tue May 30 2000 20:50:34 by AF-A319
Is The A3XX Going To Get Off The Runway? posted Tue Feb 15 2000 02:26:15 by Piperman
Is The A3XX The Only Reason To Live For The 747? posted Mon Sep 27 1999 21:40:36 by GoA340
Is There A Market For The A3XX posted Mon Aug 30 1999 01:24:53 by AirT85
Why Is CSA Stopping The Prague-Edinburgh Service? posted Fri Jan 26 2007 13:47:59 by 8herveg
How Much Lift Is Generated By The Belly Of An A/C? posted Wed Jan 24 2007 16:40:49 by Gh123