Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Not Brown Field?  
User currently offlinePhuebner From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 244 posts, RR: 5
Posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

aaallllllllrrrrrIIIIIGGGHHHTTT!!!!! I'm ready to start a fight here.  box  So bring it on!

With the argument going on with Miramar being the desired replacement for SAN I know that Brown Field was mentioned and amazingly dropped as a possibility. Oh pray tell, why was it dropped again? I heard something about the environmental issues etc. blah blah blah. I think that it was just a basic drop for the want of Miramar. Brown field seems like a good possiblity. It's fairly open there, pretty flat, and not alot of homes to be affected...more homes will be affected at Miramar. So, I just want to hear what the arguments are for dropping Brown Field as a replacement airport for SAN.


Remember this, Your Body is a temple Not a pull toy!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3188 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1299 times:

This page summarizes the different sites and why they were excluded:

http://www.san.org/authority/assp/potential_sites.asp

For Brown, it was eliminated for extraordinary environmental costs, further delineated as existence of extensive biological resources, isolated prehistoric and historic sites on and adjacent to site, potential for paleontological resources, and significant airspace constraints.


User currently offlineCoronado990 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1597 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

Two words...

OTAY MOUNTAIN!!!



Uncle SAN at your service!
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1141 times:

Wow. That fight lasted what? 30 seconds?

As stated above: Otay Mountain. It can't be removed to make it possible. It's Federal protected land compliments of Bill Clinton who signed off on the 18,500 acres in 1997 (right after the cargo facility was dropped sealing it's fate as a commercial airport). Nothing amazing or arbitrary about it. The law is clear on airport site selection. State land (there is none), Military airfields (Miramar being optimum), private land (eminant domain) then Federal environmentally protected sites. What's at Miramar will be moved long before the Fed approves such a proposal to make Brown work as a commercial airport.

Good place for Ospreys and Helo's though....

To keep your base (Miramar), 20,000 people civilians will lose their homes. You happy?

Miramar won't stand a chance when it comes to this in about 10 years. One might as well vote yes and get the ball rolling, because at the end of the day, the Marines will not be asked, but told to leave. At least with joint use they can keep some operations vs. the inevitable "zero" operations.

Don't think it'll play out like that? Stick around a couple of years.

[Edited 2006-07-12 08:15:35]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Not Many BA To S. America posted Thu Nov 23 2006 14:29:14 by Amirs
British Airways @ Heathrow T3 Why Not Also At T2? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 13:52:08 by 8herveg
Why NOT -- AA To GEO And PMB? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 01:34:08 by AJMIA
LGW -why Not A Tunnel To Pier 2, North Terminal posted Tue Oct 24 2006 15:22:31 by TimRees
Why A340 - Why Not A330 If Less Fuel Consumption? posted Thu Oct 5 2006 17:50:31 by LordHowe
Fuel's Expensive...why Not Use Tugs? posted Fri Sep 29 2006 02:25:53 by ATCGOD
JetBlue San-Iad, Why Not San-Bos? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 07:22:07 by Hockey55dude
Why Not Even One Airworthy Concorde? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 02:36:42 by YULspotter
Why F/A, Not Stewardess/Hostess? posted Sun Sep 10 2006 11:38:24 by Art
Why Not A380 Combi? posted Tue Sep 5 2006 19:30:53 by QatarA340