Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Be Honest.  
User currently offlineAa777dr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1300 times:

Hi all. I will be flying on a TWA MD-80 the day after tomorrow. I have no concerns what-so-ever about flying on this particular airline and airliner. My route will be LGA-PBI.

Please give me your most honest opinion about what you think of the MD-80 in general. And if you have some exeperiences (bad or good) please share them with me.

Thank you,

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAcvitale From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 922 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

I fly that route frequently and often with TWA and love TWA and the MD80 enjoy.

User currently offlineATL From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 68 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1128 times:

I personally like the 2-3 seating arrangement a lot more than the 3-3 that you get on the 737's and 757's. The only thing I don't like about the MD-80's is if you get seated next to the engines because they are kind of loud. I have never been on TWA, so I can't comment on that part of the flight.

Have a nice trip

User currently offlineLauda 777 From Sweden, joined May 1999, 501 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1124 times:

I like it...For short routes...

Alot of power!

Joystick for flightsim. Yokes for real planes.
User currently offlineOH-LGA From Denmark, joined Oct 1999, 1436 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1115 times:


WONDERFUL AIRCRAFT! I flew on it Summer of 1999 between Helsinki and Barcelona (4 hour flight) and it was one of the most comfortable flights I've had. It was rather quiet, the seats nice and the view lovely! The takeoff was absolutely terrific, and the landing in BCN was a mix between a firm and a greaser, absolutely textbook. Sadly, the aircraft I flew, OH-LMN (click for pictures), has recently left Finnair for a buyer I do not know. Picture of the plane at BCN is below. Great job Finnair! Too bad they're being phased out for Airbuses (but Airbuses are cool too, just wish the DC-9-50's were going)

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Marlo Plate


Head in the clouds... yet feet planted firmly on the ground.
User currently offlineSEVEN_FIFTY7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 957 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1104 times:


There's nothing wrong with 'em.

User currently offlineEyeSky From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1100 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have flown on AS and AA MD-80's. I'd avoid the aft 3 rows of seats - ATL is right, it does get kind of noisy back there. Although I haven't flown on one of their MD-80's, my experiences with TWA have been mostly positive. Enjoy your flight!

User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1102 times:

Personally, I enjoy flying in MD-80s. They are quiet, swift planes, and fairly comfortable in all airline configurations I've ever flown - TWA, Midwest Express, PSA, Finnair, SAS.

I flew with TWA coast to coast on MD-80s and a 757-200 in 1996; San Diego - Los Angeles - St. Louis, then St. Louis - Baltimore and return. The flights were great, the cabin staff helpful and friendly, and the aircraft clean. I was even bumped up to first class on the St. Louis - San Diego return leg as the gate agent wanted to put a family together in coach. This was on New Year's Eve, and the champagne flowed freely. Overall, very pleasant experience.

User currently offlineAviador From Argentina, joined Feb 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1088 times:

I love the MD-80 to death, mostly because of its design being a welcome departure from the norm. The size of the rear-placed engines, the T-tail as well as the length fascinates me. I'm one who loves the noise of aircraft and although the MD-80 isn't the loudest, the power (as Lauda777 said) is awesome.

The seating configuration is great and I love the inclination of climb (although not as great as the DC-9, but that also depends on the pilot as well). After take-off, it's great to be inclined back in your seat and see the class-dividing wall WAY up in the air.
As far as I know, it has a very good safety record. The longest flight I've done in the MD-80 is 3h45m and the shortest, about 12mins.
It's one of my favourite type of aircraft.

I hope you enjoy your trip on one such example.

User currently offlineExnonrev From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 621 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (15 years 5 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1067 times:

You'll enjoy it. The Dog is probably the most reliable commercial jet flying today. They're smooth, quiet (as long as you're not sitting aft of the 2L door), and built like a tank.

Since you're flying TW you'll probably get one of the last MD-80s built on at least one leg of your trip.

User currently offlineUSAirways737 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1026 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1032 times:

TWA is great. You'll have a great flight!

User currently offlineStarship From South Africa, joined Nov 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 13
Reply 11, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

I've flown on MD-80s twice. Both flights were quiet and smooth. I even got to spend the last half hour of the second flight in the cockpit including a night landing - that was a wonderful experience. Wish I could do it again.

Behind every "no" is a "yes"
User currently offlineAdam84 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1400 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1018 times:

MD-80's are great. I flew on 1 with CO on IAH-SJC and 4 with AA JAX-DFW-OAK-DFW-JAX, like everyone else said, dont get stuck in the back. I was seated in the front 4 out of the 5 flights and they were all good experiences.

User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 998 times:

WHen I travel, I fly USAirways, and my family and I agree that MD-80's are very uncomfortable. The seat pitch isn't much and there isn't tmuch legroom. When I flew an American MD-80, I found the same thing. I don't know if this is true of TWA's MD-80's. We try to aviod them if possible (in favor of 737's)

Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineSKYTEAM From France, joined Nov 2009, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 994 times:

I think the MD-80 is a great aircraft!!!!! I have had some good experiences on them, and a couple bad experiences. I have flown on Delta, TWA, American, and Continental's MD-80's, and have found TWA's MD-80's to be the best, and Continental's to be the worst.

I know you will enjoy flying on TWA's MD-80's


User currently offlineGreeneyes53787 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 981 times:

My experiences on DC-9s have been good. The MD-80 is a good aircraft. I especially like the interior width. This lends itself to more of a first class experience in coach than a 737. Also MD-80s don't give that loud wind noise you get from the 737 (the Boeing competition).

I find these two bad features though:
1, the floors are too flexible. When someone walks down the isle my seat moves a little.

2, the engines are quite loud (and not pretty sounding) in the back. They sound like a UPS truck (Ford in-line six) without a muffler under power.

Here's a bonus though. The interior is less busy looking than the 737, and really quite appealing.


Ps-oh yeah, the MD-80s' initial climb is amazing. You'll love it.

User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7879 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 957 times:

I will add to the chorus of praise for the SUPER 80. It probably has to be my favorite aircraft. Flown on both TWA and Continental's -80s. The 2-3 setup makes everything seem a lot less cramped. Even being on the 3 side will all the seats full. It is very quiet when you are in the front half of the cabin... say ahead of row 20. If you are stuck next to the engines, which is just as bad in a 727... then the noise is pretty bad. When I flew TWA in 1996 from STL-PHX the legroom seemed to be slightly more than the standard. Even the older Super 80 that I was on was quite nice. Overall I have flown a variety of segments on the 80... STL-PHX (TW), CLE-BWI/BWI-CLE (CO), IAH-TUS (CO).

Too bad Boeing had to stop making them.

Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3535 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 951 times:

I've flown the MD80 more times than I can remember. Never had any problems with them. Au contraire - it's a wonderful plane to fly.

Enjoy your trip!

User currently offlineAa777dr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (15 years 5 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 930 times:

Well you guys. I can't thank you enough. I have flown this route and this airplane before. It was a wonderful experience. I just wanted to know if everyone here shared the same opinion. I guess now it is clear to me.

Thanks a million,

User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8683 posts, RR: 22
Reply 19, posted (15 years 5 months 22 hours ago) and read 909 times:

I've flown CO's MD80's alot. They are comfortable, quiet (unless you're behind the engine   ) and reliable. I love em!

This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineRuslan From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (15 years 5 months 17 hours ago) and read 897 times:

Everything is perfect! Design, interior lay-out, great powerful engines. You get the benefit of hearing them in action when you line up to use the bathroom, for example (Haha!). Seriously, I don't sleep at all on aircraft, so the engine noise isn't a problem.
Also, the climb-out is great and at 39000 feet (only once or twice have I heard of an MD-80 cruising at such altitudes, besides my flight), it's bliss!
Enjoy your flight Aa777dr. An MD-80 trip is worth it.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lebanon (KLEB) Can It Be A Big Player? posted Sun Sep 13 2009 07:53:17 by CalibansA333
Historic Bulgarian TU154 To Be Sunk Into The Sea posted Fri Sep 4 2009 08:28:09 by OA260
Finnair CEO: 50% Of The Workforce Can Be Fired! posted Mon Aug 31 2009 10:34:03 by FFlyer
Are These The First 2 767-300ER's To Be Scrapped? posted Tue Aug 18 2009 05:44:08 by 76er
Philippine Airlines To Be Sold? posted Tue Aug 11 2009 08:30:01 by Hugo
Would BA 's 77W Be Under Construction Yet? posted Tue Aug 11 2009 04:28:13 by ClubWorld1986
A320 Successor Will Be Built Alone In Hamburg posted Mon Aug 10 2009 02:12:07 by Oldeuropean
AI's Revival Plan-to Be Profitabe In 36 Months posted Sat Aug 8 2009 02:59:34 by Aviationbuff
ANA's 773..this Can't Be Right. posted Wed Aug 5 2009 16:34:12 by COEWR2587
SLC-NRT To Be Cut On Oct 1st? posted Wed Aug 5 2009 02:29:51 by Vincentslc