ATL From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 68 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1054 times:
I personally like the 2-3 seating arrangement a lot more than the 3-3 that you get on the 737's and 757's. The only thing I don't like about the MD-80's is if you get seated next to the engines because they are kind of loud. I have never been on TWA, so I can't comment on that part of the flight.
OH-LGA From Denmark, joined Oct 1999, 1436 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1041 times:
WONDERFUL AIRCRAFT! I flew on it Summer of 1999 between Helsinki and Barcelona (4 hour flight) and it was one of the most comfortable flights I've had. It was rather quiet, the seats nice and the view lovely! The takeoff was absolutely terrific, and the landing in BCN was a mix between a firm and a greaser, absolutely textbook. Sadly, the aircraft I flew, OH-LMN (click for pictures), has recently left Finnair for a buyer I do not know. Picture of the plane at BCN is below. Great job Finnair! Too bad they're being phased out for Airbuses (but Airbuses are cool too, just wish the DC-9-50's were going)
EyeSky From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 315 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1026 times:
I have flown on AS and AA MD-80's. I'd avoid the aft 3 rows of seats - ATL is right, it does get kind of noisy back there. Although I haven't flown on one of their MD-80's, my experiences with TWA have been mostly positive. Enjoy your flight!
Ilyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1028 times:
Personally, I enjoy flying in MD-80s. They are quiet, swift planes, and fairly comfortable in all airline configurations I've ever flown - TWA, Midwest Express, PSA, Finnair, SAS.
I flew with TWA coast to coast on MD-80s and a 757-200 in 1996; San Diego - Los Angeles - St. Louis, then St. Louis - Baltimore and return. The flights were great, the cabin staff helpful and friendly, and the aircraft clean. I was even bumped up to first class on the St. Louis - San Diego return leg as the gate agent wanted to put a family together in coach. This was on New Year's Eve, and the champagne flowed freely. Overall, very pleasant experience.
Aviador From Argentina, joined Feb 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1014 times:
I love the MD-80 to death, mostly because of its design being a welcome departure from the norm. The size of the rear-placed engines, the T-tail as well as the length fascinates me. I'm one who loves the noise of aircraft and although the MD-80 isn't the loudest, the power (as Lauda777 said) is awesome.
The seating configuration is great and I love the inclination of climb (although not as great as the DC-9, but that also depends on the pilot as well). After take-off, it's great to be inclined back in your seat and see the class-dividing wall WAY up in the air.
As far as I know, it has a very good safety record. The longest flight I've done in the MD-80 is 3h45m and the shortest, about 12mins.
It's one of my favourite type of aircraft.
I hope you enjoy your trip on one such example.
Starship From South Africa, joined Nov 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 951 times:
I've flown on MD-80s twice. Both flights were quiet and smooth. I even got to spend the last half hour of the second flight in the cockpit including a night landing - that was a wonderful experience. Wish I could do it again.
Adam84 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1400 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 944 times:
MD-80's are great. I flew on 1 with CO on IAH-SJC and 4 with AA JAX-DFW-OAK-DFW-JAX, like everyone else said, dont get stuck in the back. I was seated in the front 4 out of the 5 flights and they were all good experiences.
USAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 13, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 924 times:
WHen I travel, I fly USAirways, and my family and I agree that MD-80's are very uncomfortable. The seat pitch isn't much and there isn't tmuch legroom. When I flew an American MD-80, I found the same thing. I don't know if this is true of TWA's MD-80's. We try to aviod them if possible (in favor of 737's)
Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
SKYTEAM From France, joined Nov 2009, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 920 times:
I think the MD-80 is a great aircraft!!!!! I have had some good experiences on them, and a couple bad experiences. I have flown on Delta, TWA, American, and Continental's MD-80's, and have found TWA's MD-80's to be the best, and Continental's to be the worst.
Greeneyes53787 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 907 times:
My experiences on DC-9s have been good. The MD-80 is a good aircraft. I especially like the interior width. This lends itself to more of a first class experience in coach than a 737. Also MD-80s don't give that loud wind noise you get from the 737 (the Boeing competition).
I find these two bad features though:
1, the floors are too flexible. When someone walks down the isle my seat moves a little.
2, the engines are quite loud (and not pretty sounding) in the back. They sound like a UPS truck (Ford in-line six) without a muffler under power.
Here's a bonus though. The interior is less busy looking than the 737, and really quite appealing.
Ps-oh yeah, the MD-80s' initial climb is amazing. You'll love it.
DesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7836 posts, RR: 15
Reply 16, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 883 times:
I will add to the chorus of praise for the SUPER 80. It probably has to be my favorite aircraft. Flown on both TWA and Continental's -80s. The 2-3 setup makes everything seem a lot less cramped. Even being on the 3 side will all the seats full. It is very quiet when you are in the front half of the cabin... say ahead of row 20. If you are stuck next to the engines, which is just as bad in a 727... then the noise is pretty bad. When I flew TWA in 1996 from STL-PHX the legroom seemed to be slightly more than the standard. Even the older Super 80 that I was on was quite nice. Overall I have flown a variety of segments on the 80... STL-PHX (TW), CLE-BWI/BWI-CLE (CO), IAH-TUS (CO).
Too bad Boeing had to stop making them.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
Aa777dr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 856 times:
Well you guys. I can't thank you enough. I have flown this route and this airplane before. It was a wonderful experience. I just wanted to know if everyone here shared the same opinion. I guess now it is clear to me.
Ruslan From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 823 times:
Everything is perfect! Design, interior lay-out, great powerful engines. You get the benefit of hearing them in action when you line up to use the bathroom, for example (Haha!). Seriously, I don't sleep at all on aircraft, so the engine noise isn't a problem.
Also, the climb-out is great and at 39000 feet (only once or twice have I heard of an MD-80 cruising at such altitudes, besides my flight), it's bliss!
Enjoy your flight Aa777dr. An MD-80 trip is worth it.