Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thomas Cook Diversion To Toronto  
User currently offlineCanoeGuy From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 9 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5662 times:

Searched but didn't see this posted yet:

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/07/03/1665909-cp.html

Thomas Cook flight Montreal - Shannon turns around near Quebec City and lands in Toronto, escorted by Canadian Hercules??

Must be an interesting story - anyone know more?

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7948 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5601 times:

Montreal-Shannon on Thomas Cook Airlines is an interesting story in itself, let alone the rest of it. Anyone know more about why it went into YYZ in the end, and how a Herc could keep up?


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineMatt From Canada, joined May 1999, 689 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5568 times:

I didn't think that Thomas Cook operated YUL-SNN flights. I know that they operate YUL-LGW and YUL-MAN.


Next flights: YHZ-HOG / HOG-YHZ / YQM-YUL-YQB / YQB-YOW-YUL-YQM / YQM-YYZ-YVR-YYJ / SEA-YYZ-YQM
User currently offlineCanoeGuy From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5546 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 1):
and how a Herc could keep up?

And what exactly was a Herc gonna do...?

Were they thinking Harrison Ford in "Air Force One"? Attach the tow line and evacuate?  Smile

Seriously, I'd love to know more about what was going on with this one...


User currently offlineJamesontheroad From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 537 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5493 times:

Previous posters correct: Thomas Cook do not operate YUL - SNN... there are two departures a week during the summer for Canadian Affair, one to LGW (Sunday) and one to MAN (Wednesday). I know that the MAN service operates MAN-YUL-YYZ-YUL-MAN. Unless it departed YUL with the intention of only making it to SNN.......?

*j*


User currently offlineJmc777 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2000, 234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5360 times:

Diverted with Hydraulic problems. Normal landing.

 Smile


User currently offlineJAGflyer From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 3464 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 5253 times:

I am not a physical geography major but why would a plane divert to YYZ when flying YUL-Europe?


Support the beer and soda can industry, recycle old airplanes!
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 5214 times:

Quoting JAGflyer (Reply 6):
I am not a physical geography major but why would a plane divert to YYZ when flying YUL-Europe?

Could be that there are better facilities at YYZ to handle an emergency landing.


User currently offlineTristar2000 From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 274 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 5117 times:

Better facilities in YYZ??? than YUL, YQB or YMX??? I think bigger would be the word! I can't see what would be better... they all have firefighters (duhhhh) and they don't use that white foam anymore during emergency situations.

YYZ is busy, so more complications... more delays for flights etc... and excuse me for asking, but unless you want to burn fuel... isn't landing sooner the best concept during an emergency.

Anyways, haven't read the story yet.. so I am just speculating, but YMX is the perfect airport in the area for emergencies... no traffic, away from residential areas, etc.!

Cheers,
Tristar


User currently offlineIrobertson From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 601 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 5066 times:

It could be multiple things, maybe maintenance reasons, maybe they could load the passengers onto another plane to Shannon sooner. This plane was probably on charter for someone else going YUL-SNN, maybe Transat? I'm only speculating, but I'm sure there are good reasons for all of these.

As for a Herc keeping up with a 757, lets use some common sense here. By the time it was nearing Trenton, it was probably well below 20,000 feet, maybe even at 10,000, and highly unlikely it was doing cruise speeds (450 knots). Hercs can manage 300 knots, probably do 275 comfortably, and if the 757 was at a lower altitude, it would probably be around this speed (my own guesses). The reason it was a Herc was probably one of coincidence; it was probably the only plane in the area that was reasonably ready to scramble, and any set of eyes in the event of a disaster is beneficial to rapid response (you know exactly where and when the crash is and how bad it looks, etc etc etc). That it was a Herc and not something else like a CF-18 is irrelavant, imho.

I'm sure more info will surface. Glad everything turned out okay.


User currently offlineCanoeGuy From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5010 times:

Quoting Irobertson (Reply 9):
As for a Herc keeping up with a 757, lets use some common sense here. By the time it was nearing Trenton, it was probably well below 20,000 feet, maybe even at 10,000, and highly unlikely it was doing cruise speeds (450 knots). Hercs can manage 300 knots, probably do 275 comfortably, and if the 757 was at a lower altitude, it would probably be around this speed (my own guesses). The reason it was a Herc was probably one of coincidence; it was probably the only plane in the area that was reasonably ready to scramble, and any set of eyes in the event of a disaster is beneficial to rapid response (you know exactly where and when the crash is and how bad it looks, etc etc etc). That it was a Herc and not something else like a CF-18 is irrelavant, imho.

Well that puts a damper on my Harrison Ford/Air Force One theory, which personally I think is FAR more likely, but it certainly makes a lot of common sense.

Quoting Tristar2000 (Reply 8):
YYZ is busy, so more complications... more delays for flights etc...

Yep, as someone who tried desparately for 30 hours last week before succeeding in getting home to YYZ from ATL, all because of a few lousy t-storms, let me tell you YYZ did not need more complications this week.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Thomas Cook A320 To Condor... posted Thu Dec 8 2005 10:31:48 by Atco2b
Thomas Cook Belgium To Sri Lanka And India posted Fri Aug 15 2003 18:45:28 by Pakistania
Thomas Cook Airlines To Dispose Of 13 Aircraft posted Fri Aug 1 2003 22:16:06 by Vfw614
New: Thomas Cook (Condor) To South Africa posted Sat May 24 2003 14:31:47 by Sabena332
Thomas Cook To Mexico posted Tue Oct 3 2006 15:11:46 by Mansimon
Lufthansa To Sell Thomas Cook posted Mon Apr 24 2006 07:44:01 by LTU932
Thomas Cook To Introduce NCL-CUN posted Wed Apr 19 2006 13:04:57 by Gkirk
Thomas Cook A332 Back To MSY On 2/23 posted Mon Feb 13 2006 21:47:00 by MSYtristar
Thomas Cook To Add Quebec City - LGW posted Mon Sep 6 2004 11:02:29 by 7LBAC111
Thomas Cook To Fly To Virtually Deserted Island posted Sun Aug 29 2004 20:58:36 by Topjet330