Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About Largest Operators Of 757 And 767?  
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5266 times:

How come out of largest operators of the 757 and 767, they are based either in North America, or in the case of the 767, Japan?

The top operators of the 757 are all based in North America:
1. American (143)
2. Delta (121)
3. Northwest (67)
4. Continental (58)

For the 767, the top operators are:
1. Delta (104)
2. All Nippon (79)
3. American (74)
4. JAL (39)
5. United (35)
6. Air Canada (33)

Once again, how come out of largest operators of the 757 and 767, they are based either in North America or Japan?


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRMD11 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5246 times:

757 maybe because its a good trans con aircraft?


none
User currently offlineUPSMD11 From United States of America, joined May 2003, 816 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5237 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Don't forget UPS (5X). They operate a fleet of 75 757-200PF and 32 767-300PF aircraft, putting them bigger than CO and NW for 757 fleet size and only slightly smaller than AC and UA on 767 fleet size.

John


User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5207 times:

Quoting RMD11 (Reply 1):
757 maybe because its a good trans con aircraft?

The 757 IMO would be good for high-yielding intra-European operations where widebodies aren't needed.

For comparison, the top operators for the 747 and 777 are more diverse:
Top 777 operators:
1. Singapore (58)
2. United (52)
3. American (46)
4. British Airways (43)
5. Emirates (37)

Top 747 operators:
1. JAL (60)
2. British Airways (57)
3. United (30)
4. All Nippon (23)
5. Northwest (19)



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5207 times:

Quoting UPSMD11 (Reply 2):
Don't forget UPS (5X). They operate a fleet of 75 757-200PF and 32 767-300PF aircraft, putting them bigger than CO and NW for 757 fleet size and only slightly smaller than AC and UA on 767 fleet size.

Yes, but UPS is a cargo airline.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlineWorldTraveler From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5194 times:

Boeing's biggest customer base for all aircraft historically has been in the US and in Japan. Overall, US airlines formed the bulk of the 757 program and the 767s are common aircraft so the success of the 2 went hand in hand.
The 747 and 777 are more unique in their mission which is part of why they are more universal in their appeal.


User currently offlineLazyshaun From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 549 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5167 times:

Its also interesting to note that even though the two a/c types are huge in the US and Japan, the 757 never got an order in Japan, am I coorect, and there are no 757 active in any Japanese airlines. Not one.

However it is also worth noting that Japan has a very limited number of a/c types operated...

no A319
few 320/321
no 330
no 340
no 380

no 757

no ATR

no Embraer

very few CRJ.

Basically your restricted to Dash-8, 737, 747, 767, 777 and ordered 787.

Also the answer to why there are so many 757/767 in the US could well be because Boeing are of course from the US, and regardless of what people say, it has an effect on the choice of a/c in some US majors (i.e. AA, DL etc)



I came. I saw. I conquered
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5142 times:

Quoting Lazyshaun (Reply 6):
Also the answer to why there are so many 757/767 in the US could well be because Boeing are of course from the US, and regardless of what people say, it has an effect on the choice of a/c in some US majors (i.e. AA, DL etc)

You forget that three of the biggest Airbus operators are also US carriers - those being US/HP, UA and NW.

----------

The 757 was widely popular with the US carriers due to its size and range; although the 757 started out being a successor to the also popular 72S, it became much more. That the 752 could accommodate about 200 pax on routes and operate effeciently on route ranging from 200 mile hops to transcon and west coast-Hawaii (and more recently transatlantic) services made the airplane a very good choice for the US airlines; European carriers did not quite need the range or capacity of the 757 for most of their routes, thus the European carriers were more focused on the 737/A32X airplanes and did not order the 757 in huge numbers, that being said, BA was at one time a very big 757 operator (and a launch customer for the type) and many European charter used and still use the 757 extensively. The 757 was not a big seller in Asia (although there are a good number in China) due to the fact that Asian customers strongly prefer widebody airplanes.

The 767 is popular with both US and Japanese carriers for entirely different reasons....the 767 was ordered in big numbers by US carriers since it was the ideal midsize jet and offered the right size and economics to launch routes from the US to Europe...as US carriers developed multiple hub route systems, the need for very large airplanes diminished and the 767 allowed the US carriers to offer multiple flights from multiple hubs to European cities. Of course, the 767 was also used on domestic service.......DL for example uses the 767 simply to move a lot of passengers over short to medium haul routes in addtion to longer range services. Japanese carriers went with 767 as a shorter haul/regional airliner.


User currently offlineWestWing From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2134 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5116 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):

The top operators of the 757 are all based in North America:
1. American (143)
2. Delta (121)
3. Northwest (67)
4. Continental (58)

Btw, UA operates something like 97 757s. They should be on your list.

[Edited 2006-07-04 00:32:35]


The best time to plant a tree is 40 years ago. The second best time is today.
User currently offlineCruiser From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1001 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5097 times:

AC operates something like 42 767's. I think you forgot to include the 762's.

James



Leahy on Per Seat Costs: "Have you seen the B-2 fly-by at almost US$1bn a copy? It has only 2 seats!"
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5063 times:

Quoting Cruiser (Reply 9):
AC operates something like 42 767's. I think you forgot to include the 762's.

I updated the Wikipedia article, and they operate 45. While not a U.S. carrier, the question stated North America, not just the U.S.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlinePar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7377 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4949 times:

Another factor no one has bought up yet, what were / was the competing Airbus product being offered at the time. The big selling time for these a/c was before the subsidy issue was front and center, so it is entirely possible that European Airlines were "pressured" to purchase "home grown" a/c.

The B747 was in a class by itself at the time and sales certainely reflect that. Ditto the B737, as soon as a competing Airbus product came along the B737 saw its European market go flat, only picked up somewhat by LCC's.


User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3529 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4833 times:

Quoting WestWing (Reply 8):

Btw, UA operates something like 97 757s. They should be on your list.

Yeah I was thinking that too!



Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5711 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4736 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 3):
Top 747 operators:
1. JAL (60)
2. British Airways (57)
3. United (30)
4. All Nippon (23)
5. Northwest (19)

Ah no. QF operates 36 B747s and so should be No3 on your list. As at 30/6/06 QF operated 6x B744ERs, 24x B744 & 6x B743 see
http://qantas.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/q...hp/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=462 One B743 is in fact, withdraw from use, but still offically operated!

What about AF & LH would not they be in the general area?

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26593 posts, RR: 75
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4724 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
1. American (143)
2. Delta (121)
3. Northwest (67)
4. Continental (58)

Glaring miss of United's 97 birds

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):

Once again, how come out of largest operators of the 757 and 767, they are based either in North America or Japan?

Big Boeing customer countries and also the aircraft fit the market

Quoting Gemuser (Reply 13):
What about AF & LH would not they be in the general area?

Yes. LH operates 30 747-400s while AF operates a mixed fleet of 20 passenger and 12 freight 747s. They also left out KLM's 25 744s.

This is yet another example of why you should never depend of Wikipedia.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4709 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):
This is yet another example of why you should never depend of Wikipedia.

THANK YOU for pointing this out.....the references on this site are simply incorrect or incomplete in so many cases.


User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4650 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 15):
THANK YOU for pointing this out.....the references on this site are simply incorrect or incomplete in so many cases

Thanks, I will update it now. Still though, the largest 747 customers are not dominated by North American or Japanese carriers.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3754 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 4630 times:

One of the largest operators of the B744 is BA and the A320 is UA. No real reason for it, just happens to be.

User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6570 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 4599 times:

Quoting Richardw (Reply 17):
One of the largest operators of the B744 is BA

British Airways is THE largest operator of the 747-400, although JAL operates more 747s overall.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3529 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4567 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):

This is yet another example of why you should never depend of Wikipedia.

Very True. Wiki is a great site for general information and a place to start off if you're looking for certain info, but always supplement that with other, more reliable sources.



Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineCO738 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4557 times:

There is no way that CO could only have 58!! just hang out at EWR for a few hours and its like 757 heaven that and the occasional 1 million 737's from CO that pass through there. But for the reason why most 757, 767 aircraft are located in North America and Japan, IMO North America for the most obvious reason that Boeing is located in the US there for its easier for the plane to be sent back for MX if the manufactor has found a problem with it or for its closeness to delivery locations. As for Japan, The US and Japan have been close business partners for sometime and you tend to shave a little pricing off the top to your closest partner


If only you could install an air horn on a plane...
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16883 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4507 times:

Quoting CO738 (Reply 20):
There is no way that CO could only have 58!!

41 757-200s
17 757-300s



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineCO738 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 4486 times:

well if that is the case than all 58 have to be making stops into EWR cause thats all i see next to the CO Express and 737's maybe they stole some lol


If only you could install an air horn on a plane...
User currently offlineUPSMD11 From United States of America, joined May 2003, 816 posts, RR: 4
Reply 23, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4322 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 4):
Yes, but UPS is a cargo airline.

But the OP didn't specify cargo or passenger!


User currently offlineAirbusA6 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2013 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4249 times:

US operators hence long domestic trans continental sectors, where the 757 is very handy.
In Europe, the short haul routes are shorter, so A321s are perfectly acceptable, and the rise of high speed trains and LCCs have reduced the need for 757s or WBs.

On long hauls, most European carriers use larger planes, or A310s and A332s.



it's the bus to stansted (now renamed national express a4 to ruin my username)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Future Of 757 And 767 posted Fri Jun 8 2001 16:03:47 by Godbless
Who Is The Largest Operators Of 767's Long Haul? posted Mon Dec 13 2004 02:00:24 by Ktachiya
A Mysterious 757 Of Israir And A 767 F-GLOV posted Sun Aug 18 2002 10:01:14 by El Al 001
Question About The Labeling Of Class Of Travel posted Fri Aug 4 2006 03:13:40 by Scalebuilder
Question About The Cost Of Insurance For Airlines posted Thu May 11 2006 03:14:52 by Scalebuilder
News Article About EK..mention Of ORD And IAH posted Wed Apr 26 2006 00:45:48 by Stealth777
Websites About The History Of Swissair And Sabena posted Fri Apr 7 2006 06:49:34 by BA
757 And 767 posted Mon Jan 9 2006 02:12:13 by Fvyfireman
Question About Flying Out Of SJC Term A posted Sat Oct 29 2005 22:59:47 by 3201
757 And 767-400 Cockpits posted Sat Jul 30 2005 03:30:34 by Patches