Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nasty 737-200 By DL Hangar In ATL  
User currently offlineFL1TPA From United States of America, joined May 2004, 258 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 18386 times:

Hi all. Does anyone on here know about the scuzzy looking 737-200 parked over in the corner of Delta's hangar ramp at ATL? I've seen it a lot the past few weeks driving by on Loop Rd. It has no engines and looks as if some parts have been scavenged, but it's still largely intact. I haven't noticed an a/c reg. number on the fuse., so who's is it? Can anyone reference a photo i.d. on a-net? Just curious.

FL1TPA


"Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffin' glue."
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 8945 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 18316 times:

Is this the one.

< photoid: 08427857>


User currently offlineFL1TPA From United States of America, joined May 2004, 258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 18247 times:

YES! Thank you Bennett123. That is indeed the one. I suspect they moved it there due to the ongoing construction on the south side of the field. I will include the link below.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Freight-Dawg - Airside Photography



The remarks state the a/c was used for training. I wonder if it's on it's way to the boneyard after being shoved into the corner by DL's hangar.



"Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffin' glue."
User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 8945 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 18233 times:

I think that I read that it was being used by the Fire Dept at one stage.

User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 18156 times:

It is still used for training, and was moved to its' current location next to the old DL hangar after this years' air disaster drill.

User currently offlineOttoPylit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 18095 times:

Its an old Airtran bird that suffered some kind of structural damage and was unflyable, if that helps.



OttoPylit


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 28470 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 17898 times:

Airtran bird that lost hydraulics after take off back in 98. Upon return to ATL it ran of the runway as its brakes failed.

NTSB report can be found at:
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?id=DCA99MA007&rpt=fa



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2176 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 17857 times:

Yep, it was still in the old AirTran colors as well... and if you get close enough, you can see them through the white....

- Travis


User currently offlineDc863 From Romania, joined Jun 1999, 1579 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 17786 times:

Wasn't that hangar used by Southern/Republic?

User currently offlineAA777223 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1388 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 17786 times:

When reading page 2 of the NTSB report, in the "factual report" section, it lists the engine type as a turbo fan. Am I incorrect in thinking that the engines on the 732 were the same engines on the DC-9 series aircraft, and are therefore turbojets? I always thought aircraft with no bypass is a turbojet. I have always found it odd though that the RR RB211s on the 744 and 757, and the PW on the A330, and the A343 seem to have no bypass around the main core. Anyway, thats a seperate question, but anyway, aren't the 732 engines turbojets, not turbo fans?


Sic 'em bears - 2015: IAH, FRA, CAI, EZE, NRT, BKK, DMK, REP, DAD, SGN, LAX, CHS, MUC, PRG, BUD, DFW, SAT, BOS, WAW, ORD
User currently offlineCPDC10-30 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4945 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 17688 times:

Quoting AA777223 (Reply 9):
Am I incorrect in thinking that the engines on the 732 were the same engines on the DC-9 series aircraft, and are therefore turbojets? I

Neither aircraft was ever equipped with pure turbojets. All JT8Ds on commercial aircraft are turbofans, albeit low-bypass.


User currently offlineGt1 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 133 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 17631 times:

Quoting AA777223 (Reply 9):
Am I incorrect in thinking that the engines on the 732 were the same engines on the DC-9 series aircraft

No sir, you are correct.

Quoting AA777223 (Reply 9):
and are therefore turbojets?

No sir. The original engine on the DC-9/MD-80 and the 731/732 as well as the 727 is one version or another of the P&W JT8D, which is in fact a turbo fan. It is a LOW bypass turbo fan to be sure, but it does have a bypass duct. I've changed fan assemblies on these engines several times as well as crawled up more than one tail pipe, and I can assure you they are turbo fans.

The other engines you mention are all HIGH bypass turbo fans, but they are fooling you by wearing a cowling that hides their true construction quite nicely.

It's the case of the book and the cover, you can't tell an engine's basic type/construction simply by it's cowling. Hopefully this helps.


User currently offlineFL1TPA From United States of America, joined May 2004, 258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 17594 times:

Thanks for the info everyone!

As I looked over the pic I did notice the original AirTran colors on the nose. Inerestingly enough, most planes that are involved in an incident just have the titles painted over, not the whole plane:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jan Severijns



But I guess the practice of keeping a write-off a/c for training purposes is rather common:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fabio Laranjeira - Contato Radar



FL1TPA



"Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffin' glue."
User currently offlineAA777223 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1388 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 17456 times:

Quoting Gt1 (Reply 11):
The other engines you mention are all HIGH bypass turbo fans, but they are fooling you by wearing a cowling that hides their true construction quite nicely.

It's the case of the book and the cover, you can't tell an engine's basic type/construction simply by it's cowling. Hopefully this helps.

Thanks for the help, I knew they were high bypass turbofans, as any commercial jetliner aircraft designed in the last 20 years or so seems to pretty much be, I just have always been fascinated by those specific angines, as it seems to me their cowling design would limit their efficiency.

Thanks again for the helpful info!



Sic 'em bears - 2015: IAH, FRA, CAI, EZE, NRT, BKK, DMK, REP, DAD, SGN, LAX, CHS, MUC, PRG, BUD, DFW, SAT, BOS, WAW, ORD
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 17370 times:

Quoting FL1TPA (Reply 12):
As I looked over the pic I did notice the original AirTran colors on the nose. Inerestingly enough, most planes that are involved in an incident just have the titles painted over, not the whole plane:

The leasing company probably required the aircraft to be painted over. The old Irish registration can barely be seen, but the a/c still has them on the wings.


User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 17275 times:

Reminds me of the old Martin 4-0-4 sitting in GPT.. They use it for evacuation practice.. Wasps have made it a permanent home. The old FL 732 has made a nice home for birds, as I've seen quite a few coming from the APU Inlet..

User currently offlineZippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5740 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 16512 times:

An idea for another vapid reality show: Extreme Airplane Makeover!
 laughing 

For my fellow crewmembers who were inside this old bird, what was your experience like?



I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlineVirgin747 From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 15327 times:

Quoting Zippyjet (Reply 16):
An idea for another vapid reality show: Extreme Airplane Makeover!

Too late... your idea has been beaten....

http://www.achorizons.ca/en/issues/2006/april/extreme.htm


User currently offlineVarigB707 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 14479 times:

How much is that jet worth?

User currently offlineScarebus03 From Ireland, joined Apr 2005, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 13328 times:

The "D" suffix on all the old PWs always meant turbofan. For example when the original 707s flew they had JT3C and the Braniff -220s with JT4A turbojets and later models had the JT3D turbofan albeit low bypass engines.

Brgds

SB03



No faults found......................
User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 32
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 9475 times:

I am the photographer who took that photo of this aircraft. I fly Kitty Hawk into ATL all the time, and finally took a photo of that bird last year. From what I'm told, after the runway overrun, it was deemed uneconomical to repair, and has been sitting in the grass next to South Cargo for years now. The ATL fire and police departments did use it for training for a short time.

The old AirTran colors are still clearly visible on the nose - as is the extensive damage from when the aircraft departed the runway at high speed and the nosegear collapsed. Two people were seriously injured in the accident.

Why an AirTran aircraft had an Irish registration is beyond me! Does anyone have any info on that?

Drew (Freight-Dawg)  wave 



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineTod From Denmark, joined Aug 2004, 1767 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 8997 times:

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 20):
Why an AirTran aircraft had an Irish registration is beyond me! Does anyone have any info on that?

Same reg as when Air Tara operated it.
Just guessing - probably leased aircraft and/or not FAA certified.

Tod

[Edited 2006-07-05 18:59:12]

User currently offlinePeachAir From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 369 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 8675 times:

Quoting Tod (Reply 21):
Same reg as when Air Tara operated it.
Just guessing - probably leased aircraft and/or not FAA certified.

You can still see the reg'n EI-CJW, under the "white wash" paint job. They need to get rid of this thing. It really has been an eyesore for a long time!


User currently offlineDEECEE8 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 38 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 7457 times:

The hangar where the aircraft is currently parked was orginally operated and used by Eastern Airlines, until there demise in 1991. The Hangar set vacant for quite sometime, and later became a tool for manipulation by the city of Atlanta....the city wanted the Delta Air Lines employee parking lot, and Delta wanted the Hangar...niether would move on it's demands...then Delta realizing at the time that additional hangar space was needed, gave in to the city, released the employee parking lot to Atlanta for much needed passenger parking and in turn negotiated a "decent" contract with Delta for lease of the former Eastern Hangar. Unitl just about 2 months ago when as part of Delta's retstructuring the Hangar lease was terminated, and It looks like ASA is using it now, and some of the outdoor parking pads are used for the RON Aircraft of World Airways and Omni Air International..... Hope this answers the earlier question about the hangar and Southern/Republic....that Hangar that used to belong to Southern/Republic/Northwest is still vacant and is located on the South side of the Field.

User currently offlineAndrewUber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 32
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 7457 times:

Quoting FL1TPA (Thread starter):
parked over in the corner of Delta's hangar ramp

Has the aircraft been moved? When I shot that photo it was parked next to the South Cargo facility.

Drew



I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 25, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 6554 times:

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 24):
Has the aircraft been moved? When I shot that photo it was parked next to the South Cargo facility.

It was moved about a month ago.

Quoting Tod (Reply 21):
Just guessing - probably leased aircraft and/or not FAA certified.

It was leased from Dormacken Limited, who is based in Ireland, hence the registration, as some leasing companies don't let airlines reregister the a/c in the country it is being operated in.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL Aircraft In ATL With Titles Removed posted Wed Jul 27 2005 05:02:40 by RL757PVD
AirTran's Hangar In ATL posted Thu Aug 14 2003 03:29:36 by BR715-A1-30
DAL Express To Phase Out 737-200 By Late 2003 posted Tue Aug 13 2002 20:12:48 by Md88Captain
737-200 By Any Other Name posted Mon Jul 9 2001 14:15:29 by Timmay
N102DA, Spirit Of DL, Fly-by In ATL? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 18:09:16 by 767-332ER
Old Air Tran 737-200 Accident In ATL posted Sun Aug 29 2004 05:27:17 by Reltney
Air Tran's Wrecked 737-200 Moved Today In ATL? posted Tue Aug 24 2004 06:28:08 by N160LH
How Many DL 737-200 In Service? posted Tue Aug 5 2003 01:24:54 by 727LOVER
4 DL Employees Hit By Lightning In ATL posted Tue Jun 27 2000 02:54:53 by Tritanic
DL/Shuttle America E70's In ATL! posted Mon Jul 24 2006 17:24:06 by OttoPylit