Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UBS: CO, BA, And SQ Are Our Top Picks  
User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3463 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3430 times:

I just received a copy of the latest UBS survey of Corporate Travel Managers (of which I was one of the respondants). According to this survey, an airline's network and schedule is the top driver of airline selection by corporate travelers. Since corporate travelers are the least concerned by price (most price inelastic), and tend to buy more tickets in the "front of the bus", airlines in the best position to cater to them will be the most successful.

Per the report:
"Our three preferred carriers -- British Airways, Singapore Airlines, and Continental -- all have strong positions in attractive catchment areas and strong product propositions. This leads us to believe these carriers are well placed to benefit from strong inelastic demand."

Other highlights:

- The Pacific has the most impressive growth prospects for the next 2 years. Given the inferior product of US carriers, and the Japanese carriers downsizing, CX and SQ are in the best positions to take advantage of that growth.

- Middle Eastern carriers such as Emirates will ensure competitive pressure remains high on Europe-Asia routes. However, their effect on the corporate market will be limited because most business travelers will prefer to fly non-stop when possible, rather than via DXB.

- The downsizing of average aircraft size will continue for the forseeable future on longhaul routes. The 777 has replace the 747 as the mainstay of longhaul fleets, and (especially US) airlines are adding 757/767 sized planes to longhaul routes. "The A380 will alter this picture slightly from next year, but with almost 300 B777s on order compared with around 160 A380s, we expect an on-going decline in average aircraft size."

- Network carriers are not dead. LCC's have limited appeal to corporate clients, especially given that network/schedule are the most important things to business travelers. An efficient LCC is just as likely to fail as an inefficient network carrier.

- UA and AA are the most aggressive in competing for corporate clients, with UA best demonstrating the strategy of catering to the corporate client with product differentiation such as PS and Economy Plus. CO is particularly aggressive in catering to corporate clients through its international network.

- SQ is well positioned for the future through its focus on corporate travel, its world-leading product differentiation, and its focus on cost containment and restrained growth. EK presents a moderate challenge to SQ, but SQ should be able to protect its profitability.

- BA has extremely strong premium traffic, and has limited its capacity growth. The lack of slots at LHR is a big advantage, and the market has overplayed the pension issue.

- CO has the "best combination" of earnings leverage, corporate travel focus, network diversity, and growth of all US airlines. CO has one of the best balanced networks domestically and internationally. CO will also be growing its capacity the fastest of any non-LCC in the US. This capacity growth in a healthy fare market will drive its profitability.

----------------------------------------------------------

Anyway, these are some of the highlights of a report that I thought was very interesting. I honestly don't see CO as having a balanced network from a domestic US perspective (UA in my opinion has a better balanced network), but most of the other observations seemed to be accurate.

I think it validates some of the strategies that some of the airlines have pursued, and that have been questioned on these forums. Specifically the int'l expansion by US carriers, the focus on product differentiation to woo corporate travelers (i.e. PS service), and the product focus by carriers such as SQ.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13738 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3421 times:

Congratulations on UBS on such sound financial advise that it gives to clients.

I take it that this report is not available publicly in PDF format and is just for the respondants of the survey?

UBS - "You and Us"



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3463 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3402 times:

Quoting Singapore_Air (Reply 1):
I take it that this report is not available publicly in PDF format and is just for the respondants of the survey?

I would think it would be public to some extent. I know I received it for free (via PDF), but since it is giving stock price projections, I am assuming it is for a broader market than just the respondants. It's title is: "UBS Investment Research: Q-Series -- UBS Corporate Travel Survey"


User currently offlineFlyabunch From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3402 times:

I agree with you on the CO domestic balance issue. I was a happy Platinum Elite flyer on CO for many years until I moved from the Tampa Bay area to Arizona. CO is only balanced if you live east of New Mexico as far as I am concerned. With their hub at IAH, they are not very convenient for western destinations from the west. I'll be damned if I am going to fly to IAH to come back to OAK. It just doesn't make sense.

I have switched to US/America West for convenience but it sure isn't the same as CO. I wish they had a western hub.

Mike


User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6785 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3373 times:

Quoting Travelin man (Thread starter):
I honestly don't see CO as having a balanced network from a domestic US perspective (UA in my opinion has a better balanced network), but most of the other observations seemed to be accurate.

I think this alludes to the general sense of balance among CO's flying by entity--there is a keen balance among domestic mainline, regional, international by region (Europe, Latin, Pacific, etc).

Quoting Flyabunch (Reply 3):
I wish they had a western hub.

That's the weakness network-wise in terms of CO's route structure....the circuity is a concern.


User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1857 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3351 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 4):
I think this alludes to the general sense of balance among CO's flying by entity--there is a keen balance among domestic mainline, regional, international by region (Europe, Latin, Pacific, etc).

That's the way I interpreted it, too. Don't forget, the codeshare flights with NW and DL also increase CO's domestic coverage. Being the only US Major with a New York-area hub where many corporations are based certainly will help CO in this kind of corporate travel survey.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21472 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3351 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 4):
That's the weakness network-wise in terms of CO's route structure....the circuity is a concern.

A CO/AS merger would solve this problem. Everyone talks about CO merging with a big carrier, but honestly the only one I see working would be CO+AS, it's rare to find two airlines with more complimentary fleet and route structures and such little direct competition with each other.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3291 times:

thanks for the update.. checkmark 


"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineFlyabunch From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 6):
A CO/AS merger would solve this problem. Everyone talks about CO merging with a big carrier, but honestly the only one I see working would be CO+AS, it's rare to find two airlines with more complimentary fleet and route structures and such little direct competition with each other.

That would indeed make me a happy guy. AS and CO would be a fine mesh for the destinations I need to go to the most. I would switch back in a heartbeat.

Mike


User currently offlineTravelin man From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3463 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3171 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 4):
I think this alludes to the general sense of balance among CO's flying by entity--there is a keen balance among domestic mainline, regional, international by region (Europe, Latin, Pacific, etc).

OK, when you interpret it that way I would agree CO is well-balanced. Being a West Coast guy, CO doesn't really provide many options on CO metal.

I agree CO/AS seems like an ideal complementary union. It would give CO the presence it is lacking in the West, while offering very few (if any) overlapping routes.


User currently offlineCOERJ145 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

Quoting Travelin man (Reply 9):

I agree CO/AS seems like an ideal complementary union. It would give CO the presence it is lacking in the West, while offering very few (if any) overlapping routes.

I think the only route they overlap is the SEA-EWR route.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16810 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2973 times:

Quoting COERJ145 (Reply 10):
I think the only route they overlap is the SEA-EWR route.

I think CO also flies once daily between Seattle and Anchorage.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 38
Reply 12, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2958 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 6):
A CO/AS merger would solve this problem. Everyone talks about CO merging with a big carrier, but honestly the only one I see working would be CO+AS, it's rare to find two airlines with more complimentary fleet and route structures and such little direct competition with each other.

That doesn't sound like a bad idea, but then again AS would be a good merger partner for many airlines with 737NG fleets. Still, AS doesn't give them much of an international network. CO would have to build up transpacific operations. And AS's willingness to be a merger partner is lacking.

[Edited 2006-07-07 03:35:45]


ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 13, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2899 times:

Quoting Travelin man (Thread starter):

- SQ is well positioned for the future through its focus on corporate travel, its world-leading product differentiation, and its focus on cost containment and restrained growth. EK presents a moderate challenge to SQ, but SQ should be able to protect its profitability.

what's intersting about this is that QF's debt was just downgraded because of both SQ and EK..

fair use excerpt:

"He (Moody's senior analyst David Howell)argued that Qantas faced increased competition on its long-haul routes from Middle East-based carrier Emirates as well as Singapore Airlines."

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/com...ge/0,5478,19708508%255E664,00.html



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21472 posts, RR: 60
Reply 14, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2879 times:

Quoting Atmx2000 (Reply 12):
Still, AS doesn't give them much of an international network. CO would have to build up transpacific operations.

CO doesn't need AS to provide international flights. Just LAX, Mexico, Northwest and Alaska coverage, and a complementary fleet. With AS ditching their MD80s and adding more 738s and 739s, it meshes perfectly with CO.

Even the 734s work well, allowing CO to lose their older 733s, as 734s are newer with better CASM.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineCOewraatysaz From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2711 times:

Ya know, call me stupid but I didn't realize until yesterday when looking at CO's financial statements, that they actually recorded a profit in 2003. Go to their website and see their 10-k for 2005 to see what I'm talking about.


Continental Airlines: Trabajar con empe�?��?�±o, Volar con Pasi�?��?�³n
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA And SQ Vie For SUs Lapsed 787 Slots posted Thu Nov 9 2006 10:08:15 by PanAm_DC10
UBS - CO As Top Airline Stock posted Thu Jun 22 2006 20:03:23 by AvConsultant
Operators Of Concorde Besides BA, AF, And SQ posted Sun Oct 19 2003 00:44:01 by IloveBOI
Are BA And KLM Close? posted Tue Jan 1 2002 01:35:34 by Aamd11
Airline Ratings Put SW And SQ On Top. posted Fri Apr 28 2000 22:08:12 by CX747
BA And 'the Cross'........ posted Fri Nov 24 2006 18:00:38 by BAStew
BA 737s - Where Are They From? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 19:05:44 by BFS
BA And Helsinki posted Mon Oct 30 2006 02:10:38 by CXA330300
Efficiency Of BA And CX - OneWorld Alliance posted Mon Oct 9 2006 16:58:33 by DernierVirage
BA And IB To Start Gibraltar-Spain Routes! posted Mon Sep 4 2006 12:29:49 by AIR MALTA