Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus-No Fullstop To Problems Yet? Co-CEO Pickle?  
User currently offlineHalibut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3392 times:

There is no doubt that the new Co-CEOs that are now running the show at Airbus , certainly have there work cut out for them & must deal with a great number of major issues that they had nothing to do with .That were completely out of there control .

The question is , can they effective tackle all these issues with the Co-CEO/split political set up ?

How long have Airbus been using this complicated arrangement , have they used multiple Co-CEOs before ?

Is the Co-CEO set up equally split between the French & Germans ?



No fullstop to Airbus problems yet

Posted online: Saturday, July 08, 2006 at 0030 hours IST

While analysts praised the replacements for Forgeard and Humbert, the new executives¡ªboth Frenchmen with long industrial pedigrees¡ªmust navigate a tangled web of reporting lines that seems, again, to reflect political sensitivities rather than management logic. This, the analysts said, could bog down the turnaround of Airbus that EADS has promised to its shareholders. ¡°We¡¯ll work hard and we¡¯ll work jointly to bring EADS back on course,¡± the newly appointed co-CEO, Louis Gallois, said in a joint statement with the incumbent German co-chief, Thomas Enders. ¡°Our immediate priority is Airbus. We need to stabilise the A380.¡± Gallois, a former aerospace executive who most recently ran the French state rail company SNCF, would be well placed to tackle the manufacturing problems at Airbus, according to analysts.

The trouble is, the newly named head of Airbus, Christian Streiff, will report to Enders, not to Gallois. Enders oversees the military side of EADS, which makes helicopters and missiles, rather than the commercial aviation side. That was a condition of the main German shareholder of EADS, DaimlerChrysler (the major French shareholders are the Lagardere Group and the French state). DaimlerChrysler had hoped to eliminate the two-headed management, but agreed to leave that for another day. ¡°This was a pragmatic solution,¡± said a spokesman for DaimlerChrysler, Hartmut Schick.


[Edited 2006-07-08 05:46:43]

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineWingedMigrator From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 2370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3362 times:

You know, for a bit of variety you might want to call them cornichons.  yummy 

User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 34061 posts, RR: 85
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3212 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

While Messieurs Gallois and Streiff themselves are external to Airbus, I do not believe Forgeard and Humbert alone were responsible for Airbus' missteps, so I expect some additional "housecleaning" and "managerial re-alignment" will need to be performed in the near future.

As Gallois seems to be the "production" expert, he may concentrate on the A380 program, allowing Steiff to focus on the A350/A370 program.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airwise.com Says Airbus Not Committed To 350 Yet posted Sun Nov 5 2006 23:33:09 by SSTsomeday
Why No EWR Or IAH To BUR On CO? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 03:28:19 by COEWRNJ
Airbus: No More A380 Delays, No RR Engine Problems posted Fri Nov 11 2005 17:23:08 by JetMaster
AF/KLM CEO: No Plans To Raise AZ Stake posted Sat Apr 23 2005 08:38:41 by Scotron11
CO GUM Hub, Why No Nonstops To Mainland? posted Sun Sep 12 2004 03:11:03 by 727Stretch
SIA Chairman: No Intention To Buy Into DJ.. Yet posted Fri Jun 28 2002 14:39:18 by Singapore_Air
Airbus Sees End To A380 Cancellations posted Fri Nov 24 2006 08:22:39 by UAEflyer
EADS/Airbus - No Job Losses? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 13:35:14 by NAV20
Why No QF To KUL? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 16:39:19 by QF744ER
Why No CX To TLV? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 20:50:06 by 7474ever