Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Whats The Story With BMI?  
User currently offlineIcebud From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 88 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6061 times:

Has anyone had experience flying with BMI recently?

I used to fly with them often on domestic flights and occassionally into Europe but have not been for a while, drifting over to BA instead. The reports I've been hearing about the so-called decline of this airline have saddened me even, for example with pay on-board service, automated seat alloaction, interlining at LHR etc.

Would just be interesting to hear anyones thoughts/experiences/opinions on how different this airline is today compared to pre-August 2005 when changes were brought in.

50 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineYTOFAN From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6028 times:

I took BMI LHR-CDG-LHR in February. Early morning departure @ 0635, we left the gate on time, but sat on the tarmac until 0810. On the return flight, we left on time, but sat again on the tarmac at LHR for 45 minutes. As it was a short flight and we ate prior to each of them I didnt see the use in buying the food on board however, the service was friendly.

User currently offlineBMIbaby733 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2005, 119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6000 times:

I flew BMI, MAN - LHR in April this year.
I've never flown with them before but the service was the same as easyjet & BMIbaby.

very....let's say...standard?


User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 60
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 5981 times:

No doubt the last 5 years has seen a radical change in the aviation industry and airlines have had to adapt to the new environment to survive (financially). bmi is no different. I agree that bmi's onboard services has drastically changed since August05 (with the introduction of the NBM) but that's to reflect the market conditions (i.e. competition from low cost and full service carriers). I've noticed people are quick to poke fun at bmi, and yes the airline has made questionable decisions in the past but things are looking up. I've been flying the airline several times a week for the last few months in both Y and C class and I really have to say that their ground and onboard service and product is very good (though there is room for improvement).

Passenger figures for the first half of the year show healthy growth compared to the same period last year. They are the most punctual British airline out of LHR. Moscow flights start in November. They are the only British carrier to serve the lucrative UK-Saudi market with flights to RUH and JED performing much better than predicted and DMM expected to come online next year. MAN-ORD and MAN-LAS flight are doing very well passenger and yield wise (especially ORD). LHR-EDI continues to be their busiest route with equipment upgrade expected on the route soon (NAP and DUB flights record 85%+ loadfactors). LHR-BOM flights are not doing as well as expected due to what can only be described as a sudden glut in flights on the UK-India market and there are no plans to launch DEL flights. On the European network, there are rumours that ALC and NCE flights will be terminated. ALC is enjoying high loads but yields are low. Passenger numbers to NCE have dropped after AF stopped codesharing on the flights. A new European destination (other than MOW) is planned late06/early07. The charter operation this summer is the largest ever undertaken especially out of BFS and bmibaby passenger figures are very high especially out of EMA.

All in all bmi seems to be trying to correct the errors it made in the past. Yes it's great to have a 'free' meal onboard (price included in your ticket) but with the price driven nature of today's market it may not be financially feasible nor sustainable. bmi's new 'tiny fares' have allowed the airline to market itself to a large yet relatively untapped market out of LHR.

I see BD returning to its former glory if they focus on improving operations out of 'lucrative LHR' whilst catering to the market needs.


Horus

[Edited 2006-07-11 01:22:21]


EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5881 times:

I took the BMI A332 flight from LHR to BOM about a month ago. The outbound flight was only about 30% full, and there were only about 5 of us in premium economy and about 6 in Business. The service was fantastic and the food great.

The flight back was full in every class. The crew once again were fantastic. I can't remember what I ate, because I think I ate nothing. BMI's premium economy seats are excellent and you can sleep all the way from BOM to LHR. When I woke up 30 minutes before landing, the male flight purser came up to me and offered me a light breakfast and a cup of tea. I thought it was rather nice of him. Chatting with the cabin crew, they told me that the flight is usually full on weekends, but has lighter loads during the week.


User currently offlineIcebud From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5695 times:

Horus,

You mention an equipment upgrade soon to be announced on EDI-LHR. But hasn't BMI recently downgraded equipment on this route recently, with the regular A321 being replaced by a mix of A320 and A319. EDI used to be an A321 for the first am flight daily and this is now an A320 or A319 I think.


User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5674 times:

Quoting Horus (Reply 3):
Passenger numbers to NCE have dropped after AF stopped codesharing on the flights

AF only had 10-20 seats for sale on each BD flight, and dropped the codeshare because BD no longer offered a "full-service" product on the flight. For the same reason, passengers are deserting to BA in droves. That and the fact that BA manage to operate 7 full-service flights a day to London (LHR/LGW) to BD's one.


User currently offlineDgehfx From Canada, joined May 2001, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5623 times:

I travelled from BOM to LHR in FEB on BMI. I was upgraded to Premium Economy cabin which was slightly less than half full. It was one of the best flights I've ever taken. Serene from take-off to landing, from what I know - I slept for many hours.
The flight attendant was very attentive, bringing me extra newspapers without being asked so I could work on the Sudoku. The food was good and adequate. The aircraft - A332, I think - appeared new and spotlessly clean and soothing colours.


User currently offlineMichiganMAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5598 times:

As a non aviation bod I don't often post for usually people whom are in the know will just come along and correct me.........
However I have often wondered why BMI are trying to compete with BA / Virgin at Heathrow, when they have a solid little base in Manchester and with that, jump from Star Alliance to SkyTeam to compliment the Continental / Delta flights out of ringway.......

just wondering.



UK -> USA
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 60
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5538 times:

Icebud, the LHR-EDI route has been the busiest route on the network for the past 3 months with passenger numbers up 6.3% compared to the same quarter in 2005. The route is operated almost exclusively with A320/A321s (except during the weekend when the A319 and ER4 make several appearances).

JGPH1A, IIRC initially AF had 35 seats on each flight but that number was reduced gradually until it was cancelled altogether last year. Of course nothing has been confirmed but it's likely to face the same fate as MAD.

MichiganMAN, BD has never made secret of the fact that LHR long haul is where they see the profit (greater demand and more lucrative) and that MAN long haul flights (despite being a niche market) are only a stop-gap until then. Internal 'talk' suggest that LHR-US flight (namely LHR-JFK/ORD) could be launched as early as Autumn06 if the Bermuda II treaty is rectified (they are in a much better position than their US counterparts since they have lucrative LHR slots). There's talk that 2 A332s will be ordered along with the acquisition of two ex-LH A343s. If the latter plans go ahead BD can theoretically maintain their MAN long haul flights (considering how well they're doing) whilst growing their LHR long hauls services.

Jaysit, Dgehfx, I'm glad you both had such good experiences with bmi. That certainly is their aim.

Horus



EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineChristeljs From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 533 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5493 times:

I flew them on June 17th BHD-LHR. I didn't like the idea that I could not pick my own seat and my boarding pass said I had an aisle seat so I asked if they could give me a window seat. They only had 2 window seats left so I was left with just taking what they offered. The fact that their baby "BMI baby" has the option of choosing your seat online, and BMI don't, I think is not very good.


Christel Sinsen Photography
User currently offlinePilot21 From Ireland, joined Oct 1999, 1384 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5390 times:

Horus

Not sure if you are connected with BMI, or just a loyal customer, but if you are right about things beginning to look up, I'd be pleased. British Midland use to be a great little airline and it gave EI a good kick up the ass on the DUB-LHR route when they started flying it (I think in the early 90's?? I can be corrected on that)

Having taken BMI a few times between DUB-LHR over the past few months, my impressions were not great. The worst experience was in April on Easter Saturday when I was flying on the first departure out of DUB to LHR to catch a connecting flight. The aircraft had struck a flock of birds on landing the previous evening and so was out of service, however BMI only had 2 staff on to re-check all 150 pax. What made it worse was the fact that they didn't seperate anybody into connecting/LHR only traffic, so I watched 3 EI flights leave before I was even seen and of course missed my connection!
Then it appeared that everybody was re-booked onto the next BMI flight, which still had room to spare after the 1st and 2nd flights were combined on one of the busiest weekends of the yr, so I'm surprised about the 85% load on the DUB flight you mention above. (In case this was a once off, both my Christmas flights and my return in June were about 60% full, so I'm glad if they pull through.)



Aircraft I've flown: A300/A310/A320/A321/A330/A340/B727/B732/B733/B734/B735/B738/B741/B742/B744/DC10/MD80/IL62/Bae146/AR
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5367 times:

What are there load factors in general nowadays on the BOM route?

Travel agents here in the US are offering tickets to BOM on BMI with a connecting flight on UA to LHR, although on my flight to BOM on BMI, most pax were originating in the UK.


User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 60
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 5308 times:

Pilot21,

There's no doubt there's still room for improvement when comparing the bmi of today and the British Midland of the 90s. Your Easter Sunday DUB debacle is proof of that. Having said that the infrastructure is there (staff and product wise) and simple re-organisation with a few tweaks here and there should do the trick. Last Friday I flew LHR-DUB-LHR. Due to the bomb-scare (and subsequent closure) of DUB my flight was cancelled and I was rebooked on the second flight (also delayed due to DUB problem). Ground and cabin staff were absolutely brilliant in keeping passengers up to date with the latest and doing their utmost to get passengers out as soon as possible. On the DUB-LHR sector later that evening, the flight was delayed 45minutes due a passenger from the previous LHR-DUB flight leaving a duty free bag onboard and setting off a full security alert (the fact that DUB had a bomb-scare earlier that day and that it was 7/7 didn't help). But again the staff (including Captain and F/O) were on hand to help. Once on board the SCA and cabin crew helped passengers with connecting flights with information, telexed their details to ground staff and made an announcement over the P/A asking passengers to remain seated when they've reached the gate to allow passenger with connections to disembark first. Great service recovery on both flights.

Regarding DUB (along with BHD, GLA, EDI and BRU) a dedicated business class and product is offered highlighting the importance and high yield nature of these flights. EI and BD offer almost identical economy products on the LHR-DUB route but BD has the edge by offering C class while EI has the advantage of offering greater frequency. I can't comment why your flights had lighter loads because DUB does well. I've flown on certain flights/routes where I've been told "they're always full" or "always empty" and it was quite the opposite when I got onboard.

Horus



EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 5258 times:

Today bmi officially announced LHR-DME. Heres the schedule, flights will use an A320:

Heathrow-Moscow Domodedovo BD891 Daily depart 0930 arrive 1620
Moscow Domodedovo-Heathrow BD894 Daily depart 1710 arrive 1805

Press Release - http://www.flybmi.com/bmi/en-gb/abou...essreleases.aspx?year=2006&rid=966

Quote:
Star Alliance carrier bmi and Russian Federation carrier Transaero will both launch daily return flights on 29th October at the start of the winter timetable period. The new services from Heathrow are part of a commercial agreement signed by the two carriers today (11th July) in London. This will double the number of return flights to Moscow Domodedovo from Heathrow to four round trips per day.

A commercial agreement between the two carriers was a condition of the designation of bmi to serve Moscow from London Heathrow, following the recent bilateral negotiation between the UK and Russian Federation Governments. Through the agreement both airlines will benefit from reciprocal codeshare and sales activities. This will allow bmi to offer onward connections in the Russian Federation on the services of Transaero from Moscow Domodedovo. Transaero will be able to offer connecting flights at Heathrow onto the extensive domestic, European and long haul network of bmi.

Nigel Turner, chief executive officer of bmi said “We have concluded a very constructive and mutually beneficial agreement with Transaero. This will allow us to enter an entirely new market and develop further our growing route network from Heathrow. We are determined to deliver to this market the best possible value for money, through the fares that they pay and the level of service they receive.”

Alexander Krinichansky, executive director of Transaero said “We are delighted that we have been able to conclude this agreement with bmi. With the launch of new competitive services from Heathrow by Transaero and Star Alliance member bmi, we see great potential for both point to point and connecting services. Jointly selling these new services in our respective countries will enable Transaero and bmi to benefit from the strength and reputation we enjoy in our home markets. We look forward to a long, meaningful working relationship through the implementation of our new agreement.”

Also an article from Travel Weekly on LHR-USA

Quote:
BMI is considering flying up to 12 routes between Heathrow and the US and assures that it will have no problem finding the slots to operate them.

Chairman Sir Michael Bishop said: “There is a cocktail of ways to achieve more capacity.”

Deputy chief executive Tim Bye explained: “There are slots available at certain times of the day; you could convert less valuable services into US services, and you can swap slots within alliances – although we have enough of our own.”

He declined to disclose what US routes BMI is planning, but said: “We’ve narrowed it down from about 30 to 10 or 12.

“We have sufficient slots and we have plenty of traffic to feed on to long-haul services.”

BMI.html" target=_blank>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articl...pacity+'no+problem'+for+BMI.html

I wonder what the 12 routes are. My guesses - JFK, EWR, BOS, ORD, IAD, MIA, PHL, LAX, SFO, SEA, DEN, PHX

What is clear is that medium/long haul is the future for bmi at LHR and that some less profitable short haul routes at LHR could be at risk, unfortunately routes like MME seem to be at risk in my opinion. Good to see possible A330 orders from bmi though



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineLS737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 5258 times:

The best advice you can have is to avoid bmi like the plague. They've become a dreadful airline with staff who clearly wish they were somewhere else (possibly with a decent airline). Things are so bad that they're now using ER4s on weekday flights between MAN and LHR!

User currently offlinePilot21 From Ireland, joined Oct 1999, 1384 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 5251 times:

Many thanks for a great reply Horus, and very glad to hear your experiences last week went well given the hassle in DUB everyday last week (or so it seemed). Def keeping the C class on the DUB flight has helped them in yields I'd say. My Christmas flight was with them because I was in F with AA from JFK-LHR, and even though EI is (was) a oneworld partner, AA have changed connecting flights to BD on that sector to allow pax continue the routing in C class.

Cheers for the update, and hopefully they continue the improvements. (A few extra A330's would def. help them because a lot of moaning on here has been about the lack of consistency on their long-haul products. i.e. A330/B757/B767 etc...)



Aircraft I've flown: A300/A310/A320/A321/A330/A340/B727/B732/B733/B734/B735/B738/B741/B742/B744/DC10/MD80/IL62/Bae146/AR
User currently offlineMichiganMAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5064 times:

Quoting Humberside (Reply 14):
Also an article from Travel Weekly on LHR-USA


I wonder what the 12 routes are. My guesses - JFK, EWR, BOS, ORD, IAD, MIA, PHL, LAX, SFO, SEA, DEN, PHX

What is clear is that medium/long haul is the future for bmi at LHR and that some less profitable short haul routes at LHR could be at risk, unfortunately routes like MME seem to be at risk in my opinion. Good to see possible A330 orders from bmi though

Bermuda II won't allow this though in it's current form correct?



UK -> USA
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5030 times:

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 17):
Bermuda II won't allow this though in it's current form correct?

Yes. bmi and myself in that post are assuming there will be EU-US open skies soon



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineMichiganMAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4997 times:

Quoting Humberside (Reply 18):
Yes. bmi and myself in that post are assuming there will be EU-US open skies soon

if you consider hypothetically the open skies happening won't the likes of Northwest / Continental / US Airways et al also flying into LHR will there;

a) be enough BMI slots to accomodate the 12 extra long haul flights and keep their short haul network

b) be enough bums on seats for the LHR-USA flights if you consider that the likes of US Airways, Continental and Northwest will also want to jump on the LHR open skies bandwagon.

As I asked before, why does BMI continue to play 3rd fiddle at LHR when they could be top dog in Manchester?



UK -> USA
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4917 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4978 times:

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 19):
a) be enough BMI slots to accomodate the 12 extra long haul flights and keep their short haul network

The short haul network will probably see cutbacks. I doubt the likes of EDI, GLA, AMS, BRU, CDG, BHD and DUB would see major cutbacks but routes like MME could be up for the axe

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 19):
b) be enough bums on seats for the LHR-USA flights if you consider that the likes of US Airways, Continental and Northwest will also want to jump on the LHR open skies bandwagon.

Dont forget some of the airlines will just move services from LGW and therefore will not increase capacity to London so if you take the whole LON-USA market there wouldn't be a huge capacity increase from any airline except bmi (as they dont have any LON-USA services at the moment so would be a new entrant)



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineMainMAN From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 2096 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4914 times:

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 19):
As I asked before, why does BMI continue to play 3rd fiddle at LHR when they could be top dog in Manchester?

With London being one of the the biggest and most high-yielding regions anywhere, the potential for bmi's LHR base is immense.

I agree, BMI could have a greater presence at MAN. Considering they're in the same alliance as SA, SQ, TG and NH amongst others, they could quite feasibly have been developing a network with those carriers to their own hubs. Sadly, they're not too interested.


User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4900 times:

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 19):
a) be enough BMI slots to accomodate the 12 extra long haul flights and keep their short haul network

Sure BMI owns 14% of all slots, thats over 50 per day. Drop one of the many times daily CDG / BRU / AMS / MAN / EDI / GLA / INV / ABZ / BHX routes... you get your slots.

b) be enough bums on seats for the LHR-USA flights if you consider that the likes of US Airways, Continental and Northwest will also want to jump on the LHR open skies bandwagon.

It could be what saves bmi... will have the connections in Europe which US / NW / CO will not have.



So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4892 times:

bmi used to offer an excellant service for a low price..

I flew LHR-MAN / ABZ / GLA / BRU / AMS more than 20x a year.

some of the fares.. from £50-£100 inc tax with airmiles, meal and lounge service were excellant and their flights always full.

Since 2005, Ive flown 3x (once to ABZ, 1x BRU and last weekend to DUB).
Each flight as 50% empty, the fare has increased, the airmiles decreased and not one flight actually served inflight food not even to buy.

This airline doesnt know how to make money any more.

No Budget airline flies without food to sell.. bmi doesnt stock it.. just advertises it for sale.



So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 60
Reply 24, posted (8 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4863 times:

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 12):
What are there load factors in general nowadays on the BOM route?

Here is what CEO Nigel Turner said about BOM, "...Heathrow to Mumbai route is proving to be far more challenging (compared to RUH and JED). The impact of a sudden and massive increase in capacity has created a buyers market as far as ticket prices are concerned. We are fortunate that the A330 aircraft is an extremely efficient economic aeroplance compared to some of our competitor's larger aircaft that they are desperate to fill. However, we still need to make further inroads into gaining a greater share of the market at the right yield before we can start firming up plans to serve other Indian cities in the future."

I've heard the figure of 70% loadfactors on the route. Y and Y+ are doing very well but C can be improved.

Quoting Humberside (Reply 14):
Today bmi officially announced LHR-DME. Heres the schedule, flights will use an A320:

Indeed it was. The new dedicated Business class that will be launched for the route will give them an excellent edge over BA and SU (BD's seat pitch will be 41" compared to BA's 34" and SU's 38"). Belly cargo is expected to improve the route's revenue.

Quoting Humberside (Reply 14):
Also an article from Travel Weekly on LHR-USA

BD have been yearning to enter the LHR-USA market and if Bermuda II is rectified some predict 4-6 new long haul aircraft will be dedicated to the US market.

Quoting Humberside (Reply 14):
What is clear is that medium/long haul is the future for bmi at LHR and that some less profitable short haul routes at LHR could be at risk, unfortunately routes like MME seem to be at risk in my opinion. Good to see possible A330 orders from bmi though

Focus will shift to medium haul routes with flight times similar to DME. Flights to places like IST, CAI, LCA, KWI, etc have been thrown around.

And yes flights to MME and LBA will probably suffer cutbacks if BD can't secure more slots at LHR.

Quoting LS737 (Reply 15):
The best advice you can have is to avoid bmi like the plague.

Any particular reason why?

Quoting LS737 (Reply 15):
Things are so bad that they're now using ER4s on weekday flights between MAN and LHR!

It depends on operations and yields. If an A320 would be needed to fly to e.g. AMS or DUB and an ER4's capacity sufficed the demand on a particular (22 minute) flight to MAN, then so be it.

Quoting Pilot21 (Reply 16):
Many thanks for a great reply Horus, and very glad to hear your experiences last week went well given the hassle in DUB everyday last week (or so it seemed). Def keeping the C class on the DUB flight has helped them in yields I'd say. My Christmas flight was with them because I was in F with AA from JFK-LHR, and even though EI is (was) a oneworld partner, AA have changed connecting flights to BD on that sector to allow pax continue the routing in C class.

Cheers for the update, and hopefully they continue the improvements. (A few extra A330's would def. help them because a lot of moaning on here has been about the lack of consistency on their long-haul products. i.e. A330/B757/B767 etc...)

You're most welcome Pilot21. The B757 issue raised many eyebrows within the company itself and it's unlikely to ever be repeated. The Arkefly B763, is a temporary measure however the aircraft has a higher number of C class seats than the A332 which perfectly suits the KSA market. Nigel Turner stated, "Our decision to also increase the number of business seats on our services to Saudi Arabia is also proving to be a good strategic move. It enables us to specifically address the increased demand for higher yield business class passengers to the region."

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 17):

Bermuda II won't allow this though in it's current form correct?

Yes only BA, VS, UA, AA, AI, KU and NZ are allowed to fly LHR-US flights at the moment.

Quoting MichiganMAN (Reply 19):
As I asked before, why does BMI continue to play 3rd fiddle at LHR when they could be top dog in Manchester?

...

Quoting Horus (Reply 9):
MichiganMAN, BD has never made secret of the fact that LHR long haul is where they see the profit (greater demand and more lucrative) and that MAN long haul flights (despite being a niche market) are only a stop-gap until then. Internal 'talk' suggest that LHR-US flight (namely LHR-JFK/ORD) could be launched as early as Autumn06 if the Bermuda II treaty is rectified (they are in a much better position than their US counterparts since they have lucrative LHR slots). There's talk that 2 A332s will be ordered along with the acquisition of two ex-LH A343s. If the latter plans go ahead BD can theoretically maintain their MAN long haul flights (considering how well they're doing) whilst growing their LHR long hauls services.

Horus



EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
25 Post contains images UTA_flyinghigh : I fly DUB-LHR on bmi more often than not and unfortunately it is a lottery. You can either get the most charming cabin crew and the nicest of flights
26 Post contains links Nimish : Here's information for the next few days 14/July: BD781 LHRBOM C9 D9 J6 I0 U9 L9 Z2 Y9 S9 B9 K9 M9 H9 Q9 V9 G3 W3 T3 N0 E0 X0 15/July: BD781 LHRBOM C
27 BDKLEZ : The general feeling appears to be that things are starting to look rather rosier then they have been for quite some time now. Their end of year result
28 MainMAN : Precisely, there are other opportunities out there for BD, and it would be prudent to capitalise upon these and grow, leaving them in a better positi
29 Danny : I have flown a couple of times DUB-LHR-DUB recently. Service comparable with Ryanair but on time performance much worse.
30 BDKLEZ : A bit harsh in my opinion, but I wasn't there. Perhaps you/they were having an "off" day!
31 Cainanuk : It is also monsoon season and the loads are always quieter at this time of year.
32 Lhrmaccoll : I suppose you are reffering to load factors? Otherwise its a great little AC to fly that sector on. I've done it 6 or 7 times since April
33 ANother : And if I count correctly there are 21 reward/upgrade seats available over a week! Glad I'm not in their FF plan.
34 Bmiexpat : An availability dispay such as this doesn't tell you how booked a flight is, simply that there are 9+ seats left for sale in that booking class. The
35 Nimish : Good point. Is there any better way to find out the actual loads on the flight?
36 Planemanofnz : Will this business cabin also be transferred onto DUB/BHD/GLA/EDI/BRU flights? Or will it just be on one A320? If it is only on one aircraft, it seem
37 BDKLEZ : Not really, unless you know someone who works for the airline directly who would have access to such information. Reservations staff, Ticket Desk sta
38 SAA346 : Flew LHR>EDI 02-Jul and EDI>LHR 07-Jul - flights full. But service (after connecting in/out with SAA) - I was flying on a pair of etickets. 1. SAA cou
39 BDKLEZ : So "seperate" tickets then? If that is the case, then no carrier is obliged to through check. Many have however done so in the past and may still do
40 Post contains images SAA346 : Thanks BDKLEZ, I live and learn
41 JGPH1A : For no apparent valid reason. There is virtually no additional cost or effort to through check pax baggage (which is wny everyone except BD actually
42 BDKLEZ : Yes, but when these bags go missing in the notoriously unreliable LHR baggage transfer system, then the cost of repatriating these bags to their resp
43 JGPH1A : If that's the case, why do BD also refuse to interline via CDG, FRA, MAN etc ? There's a simple answer here - instead of reducing already minimal cus
44 BDKLEZ : This is precisely the point. BD have for the last number of years been seemingly unaware of what or where their core business is. Mixing BD main-line
45 Post contains images PanAm330 : Gasp! You'd never survive in the US with that type of aircraft on such a route! Seriously, if the loads don't warrant it, why waste a mainline aircra
46 Bmiexpat : There is the additional cost of 1 - using the airports baggage transfer facility 2 - employing baggage staff to sort the bagagge between transfer and
47 Mhodgson : Problem is, they used to have the loads to justify an A320/321!
48 StarGoldLHR : Exactly... They used to. bmi's profits this year have come from bmibaby division which is doing quite well. But they have a fleet of A320/1 from LHR
49 JGPH1A : Perhaps passengers are resistent to paying these so-called "interline fares" because they get precious little for the extra money. After all, if I'm
50 Horus : No those 5 business routes will continue to have the converter C class seats (2-3 configuration). It makes little sense to offer the same C class sea
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Whats The Story With This Hercules? posted Wed Dec 12 2001 06:55:17 by Hkgspotter1
What's The Story With The Ex-MH 747-400 At BFI? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 04:05:43 by Jetjack74
So Whats The News With The "new" Olympic? posted Tue Mar 21 2006 23:16:25 by ATLFlyer323
Whats The Deal With Shannon? posted Thu Dec 29 2005 03:06:08 by ACdreamliner
What's The Story With This AF 767 Livery? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 00:39:29 by Braybuddy
What's The Story With IVC Runway Extensions & ZQN? posted Thu Dec 8 2005 04:37:33 by Simpilicity
Whats The Difference Between BMI And BMI Baby? posted Thu Jul 21 2005 01:03:08 by Flycro
Whats The Latest With BA In Regards To 747/777/787 posted Fri Apr 29 2005 16:49:51 by RJpieces
Whats The Problems With CLE Officals? posted Sat Feb 26 2005 17:07:27 by AS739X
Whats The Story On FedEx MEM Operations Today? posted Thu Dec 23 2004 15:33:26 by Warszawa