Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Plans To Tokyo Back In 98/99?  
User currently offlineMalexander131 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 66 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3282 times:

I was just wondering if anyone here knows anything about US having plans to start service from PHL to NRT back in the late 90's. I vaugley remember reading something about it on a press release way back but I know it didn't come to fruitation....


"It's the little room in the front of the plane where the pilots sit, but that's not important right now."
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9205 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3278 times:

I do believe they wanted to do that. Just after the new PIT terminal opened, they applied for PIT-NRT. The reason why that did not happen, they could not secure the necessary 767 aircraft to do those routes...


Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2954 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3198 times:

Also not to mention slots at NRT.

User currently offlineMCOflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 8675 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3170 times:

In addition to that the A330 a/c are 333. What US needs is 332 a/c which are due in 2008. PHX/PHL-NRT would be the better option right now.

MCOflyer



Never be afraid to stand up for who you are.
User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3096 times:

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 1):
I do believe they wanted to do that. Just after the new PIT terminal opened, they applied for PIT-NRT. The reason why that did not happen, they could not secure the necessary 767 aircraft to do those routes...

True, very true. There was an option on the A330 deliveries to convert one or more of them to A340s for possible transpacific services. I don't know what happened to those options.



It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2993 times:

Quoting Malexander131 (Thread starter):
I was just wondering if anyone here knows anything about US having plans to start service from PHL to NRT back in the late 90's. I vaugley remember reading something about it on a press release way back but I know it didn't come to fruitation....

US applied for Japan service during the 1998 U.S.-Japan Combination Service Proceeding, when there was a large increase in available services between the two countries. US applied for 7 weekly frequencies to operate daily PHL-NRT service with its own metal, and they also applied for 28 weekly codeshare frequencies to support the service. They had reached agreements to place their US* code on AA for CLT-DFW-NRT and PHL-DFW-KIX and on UA for CLT-LAX-NRT and PIT-SFO-NRT.

US then withdrew their application after ALPA told them they would not grant US relief to place their code on the other airlines' flights.  Yeah sure

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 1):
Just after the new PIT terminal opened, they applied for PIT-NRT.

No, they didn't. It was talked about, but never happened.



I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlineTokyoNarita From Palau, joined Aug 2003, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2973 times:

At the same time I believe TWA put in a request to serve STL-NRT trying to make it work with their B767s or 25 year old B747 classics, I don't think anyone took them seriously. This is when AA and CO were ready to bust out more Japan route authority. There were already MD-11s and B777s flying around.

TokyoNarita.

[Edited 2006-07-12 07:16:21]

User currently offlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3483 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2955 times:

Quoting TokyoNarita (Reply 6):
At the same time I believe TWA put in a request to serve STL-NRT trying to make it work with their B767s or 25 year old B747 classics. I don't think anybody took them seriously.

I don't know why, NW was flying MSP-KIX and MSP-NRT with 747 classics up until a few years ago, and NW was flying LAX-NRT with a 742 just a few months ago.

Jeremy


User currently offlineTokyoNarita From Palau, joined Aug 2003, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2942 times:

I do recall US Air and TWA requesting Japan route authority with B767s which probably lacked performance and range for STL-NRT, not to mention the ETOPS flying was much more restricted back then. Also, the most of the TWA B747 birds may have been the 100s with old engines that were manufactured in the early 70's, certainly wouldn't make STL-NRT, be lucky to make HNL-NRT. Those NW B742s were mounted with better engines. They were from the 80s.

TokyoNarita.

[Edited 2006-07-12 07:29:01]

User currently offlineCrownvic From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1910 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2909 times:

SESGDL...What makes people blurt out statements like this? The many 747-200 aircraft NWA has been flying right up to today are late model a/c with high gross weight P&W engines. The aircraft are perfectly suited to handle ANY trans-pacific flight with ease. One has to understand that it is economics that has killed off these aircraft and not performance. The difference in the performance of a late model NWA 747-200 vs a 1970's vintage 747-100 with low gross weight JT9D engines is day and night. If fuel were still $1.00/Gal, there would still be many L-1011, DC-10 and early 747's still flying. Please research before making these sort of comments.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Did Delta Ever Fly HNL To NRT Back In '98 Or '99? posted Fri Sep 13 2002 20:48:25 by Bobcat
America West To MLI? (Back In The Day) posted Sun Oct 22 2006 05:51:24 by B757capt
707 Service To OKC Back In The Day? posted Tue Apr 11 2006 04:26:44 by Starstream707
Philippine Air - Any Plans To Come Back To Europe? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 01:14:36 by Sabena332
United - Only US Legacy To Improve Service In '04 posted Tue Apr 5 2005 20:48:06 by FriendlySkies
US Airways To Give Back 11 B-737s posted Sun Mar 6 2005 16:35:21 by PITA333
SAS To Hong Kong In '98 posted Fri Apr 2 2004 11:43:46 by CPH-R
What Airline Would You Like To See Back In The Air posted Thu Apr 17 2003 18:37:56 by Delta777Jet
Lufthansa To DFW Back In 1995 posted Wed Jan 15 2003 12:56:19 by Godbless
Air Tahiti Nui Plans To Start Paris In May. posted Sat Mar 9 2002 00:53:11 by ZK-NBT
America West To MLI? (Back In The Day) posted Sun Oct 22 2006 05:51:24 by B757capt
707 Service To OKC Back In The Day? posted Tue Apr 11 2006 04:26:44 by Starstream707
Philippine Air - Any Plans To Come Back To Europe? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 01:14:36 by Sabena332
United - Only US Legacy To Improve Service In '04 posted Tue Apr 5 2005 20:48:06 by FriendlySkies
US Airways To Give Back 11 B-737s posted Sun Mar 6 2005 16:35:21 by PITA333
SAS To Hong Kong In '98 posted Fri Apr 2 2004 11:43:46 by CPH-R
What Airline Would You Like To See Back In The Air posted Thu Apr 17 2003 18:37:56 by Delta777Jet
Lufthansa To DFW Back In 1995 posted Wed Jan 15 2003 12:56:19 by Godbless