Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No Q-300's For QX?  
User currently offlineAlaska737 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1063 posts, RR: 5
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2956 times:

It seems as if QX should have some Q-300 series Dash-8's. QX operates a few routes that the 50 seat -300 could potentially do well on. many QX routes are constantly full with the 200s, yet they are not big enough for a -400. Routes that come to mind are: Seattle-Redmond, Seattle-Victoria, Seattle-Spokan, Seattle-Eugene, Seattle-Vancouver and Seattle-Portland. these are just some flights that i have noticed are constantly full. I think that the 300 is a great aircraft and would fit in well with QX's fleet of Bombardiers. So why doesn't QX operate the Q-300?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineThecheese From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 214 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2890 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Horizon used to fly a bunch of Dash-8's, but I think they phased them out for fleet commonality reasons.

User currently offlineAsqx From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 619 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2875 times:

Quoting Thecheese (Reply 1):
Horizon used to fly a bunch of Dash-8's, but I think they phased them out for fleet commonality reasons.

Last time I checked, Horizon still has nearly 50 Dash 8s in both Q200 and Q400 variants. Given the low operating costs and larger capacity of the Q400s, Horizon probably has little need for a Q300. Also, due to the fact that the Q400 has a lower per-seat cost than the Q200, Horizon figures that any route that would presumably be worth flying a Q300 on can just as easily be served with a Q400, which allows for much greater revenue potential.

Of the routes you mentioned, Spokane already gets plenty of Q400s, and believe me, there are times when you can't get a seat from SEA to GEG for DAYS. Plenty of times people can be found wishing that there were more Alaska flights instead of Horizon. Vancouver gets the same way. Victoria isn't steady business and the Q200 is plenty. Goeing to Portland, with 26 flights a day, and a few CRJ-700s and Q400s mixed in, the only reason to upsize the planes would be to reduce frequency, something not too likely to happen. I don't usually deal with Redmond and Eugene passengers much, at least not enough to remember. Then again, I probably don't remember because it has never been an issue finding availability into those cities for misconnecting passengers.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Winglets For 737-900? posted Thu Nov 30 2006 05:55:25 by UncGSO
Why No Winglets For Every 737-700/800? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 23:48:32 by LY777
Why No Alliance For EK, EY, MP And LT? posted Sat Oct 21 2006 17:50:21 by RicardoFG
Why No Mercy For The Disabled? posted Sun Jul 30 2006 23:19:52 by 747hogg
Why No 763s For Continental? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 20:36:19 by LY777
Why No Winglets For The 737-600? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 11:35:41 by LY777
Why No Help For People With Connecting Flights? posted Thu Mar 2 2006 16:49:37 by Works4boeing
Why No 777 For LH? posted Sat Sep 17 2005 13:15:27 by Thaigold
Why No A-380's For BA posted Sun Aug 28 2005 08:04:03 by Fiaz
Why No A-380 For DHL? posted Sat May 21 2005 23:10:32 by ChiGB1973