Adipasqu From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 236 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (6 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2725 times:
Because it was a completely different type AA didn't already have and the associated costs with such a small subfleet would have made incorporation very expensive. Reno's MD-80's, however, were incorporated into the fleet quickly.
PSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 6874 posts, RR: 29 Reply 2, posted (6 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2654 times:
Search on the topic.....
Reno's fleet was integrated in the short-term, hence the white-birds.
However, their aircraft were all of different varients including a mix of MD-82's, 83's, 87's, and '90's. All have many differences from AA's MD-80's and were not cost effective to keep in the fleet. There only 5 MD-90's anyways, and those aircraft were subject to many maintenance issues.
Usair320 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 991 posts, RR: 3 Reply 3, posted (6 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2654 times: