Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What The New A350 Says About The A320NG?  
User currently offlineWingedMigrator From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 2371 posts, RR: 56
Posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4230 times:

Hi all,

If the latest news is to be believed, the smallest A350 will have 250 seats, or more in a two-class or single-class layout. I am wondering what (if anything) that means.

Many have observed that Airbus is just moving the "hole" in its lineup, by narrowing the gap between A350 and A380, but opening a gap between the A320 and A350.

I wonder if this isn't indicative of the strategy for the replacement of the A320, another 8-10 years from now. What if the A320NG was significantly enlarged compared to the current A320, and Airbus went to a 2-3-2 cross section? I figure this might lead to a reasonable range of 140-210 seats.

Would the twin isles offer much of an advantage for turning around LCC flights? Would the aerodynamic penalty of the larger cross section be worth the cost?


1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineGrantcv From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4133 times:

I think that the size of the overhead bins is a very important consideration when it comes to the configuration of narrower jets. With 3+3 configuration, there is barely enough space for overhead baggage. With a 2+2+2 configuration, there would be less space as it would be impractical to have overhead bins in the center aisle. B777 style overhead bins won't work as the fuselage diameter won't be large enough to provide the necessary room above the cabin. Going to 2+3+2 only makes the situation worse - still not enough space for overhead bins over the center aisle, and another whole passenger to accomodate per row.

And quite frankly, if passengers could more easily get their bags into the overhead bins, the time it takes for them to get to their seats would improve. Increasing the squeeze up above will only slow things down as passenger rearrange things to try and get all their stuff to fit.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What's The New Pan Am About? posted Thu Apr 5 2001 09:14:53 by SEA nw DC10
What's New About The New Alitalia Livery?! posted Mon Oct 30 2006 18:59:21 by Gh123
What New Airlines At The New MEX Terminal posted Fri Oct 20 2006 05:20:32 by Anthsaun
What's Going On With The 2 New AS 738s? posted Fri Sep 1 2006 07:03:45 by RobK
What Happened To The New PanAM? posted Mon Jul 3 2006 05:21:42 by BillReid
What Are The Five A350 Iterations? posted Tue May 30 2006 18:30:21 by N328KF
Analyst's View On The 'Really New' A350 posted Tue May 30 2006 16:50:06 by Rheinbote
The New All New A350 Engine posted Sat May 13 2006 14:26:50 by Trex8
Composite Divide: Airbus, Boeing And The New A350 posted Fri May 12 2006 12:06:17 by A380900
Will The New A350 Mean The A340 Is Dead? posted Mon May 8 2006 20:53:16 by BoeingBus