Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could BA Use Their 757's On Long Haul Routes?  
User currently offlineGilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3038 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 8227 times:

Is is widely discussed on here that BA's long haul fleet is regularly stretched to capacity and have to juggle aircrafts around on their schedule. Also this has prevented them opening up new routes without sacrificing other routes.

As far as I am aware the European routes is where BA faces the most competition from with LCC and other national legacy carriers all flights for the same passengers.

As part of my aim to become an airline CEO from my armchair and eventually take over the world... I propose this idea!

Would it not make sense for BA to consider removing 747's, 767's and 777's off routes which could be operated by their current shorthaul fleet?

I am aware that back in the early 1990's BA was using 757's accross the pond to JFK and YYZ from BHX and GLA.

BA has a very cabable short haul fleet of A319's, A320's and A321 which in my opinion seem to be under utilized and could be deployed to routes like Cairo, Tel Aviv, Larnaca and Moscow are a few examples I could think of.

Also the 757's in the fleet could cover routes like:

Accra
Abu Dhabi
Abuja
Bahrain
Baltimore
Boston
Doha
Dubai
Ghana
Montreal
Muscat
New York - JFK
New York - Newark
Philadelphia
Toronto
Washington DC

Many of these routes are operated several times daily so even if one of these aircrafts was replaced with an A32X or 757, it would maintain the frequencies and freeing up the other aircrafts for other routes.

If moving aircrafts off the short haul fleet became a problem BA could use their BAe-146's out of London again, on their routes under 2hrs and there is also large number of BAe 146's coming on to the market with other airlines no longer using them. So I am sure BA could obtain some of these at discounted rates.

[Edited 2006-07-24 18:57:00]

34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5790 posts, RR: 47
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 8062 times:

I thought BA is in the process of selling off their 757s.


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1413 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 8041 times:

This would involve a u-turn on BA's gradual sale of its 75s, however I wouldn't be surprised if this conundrum hasn't been thrown around at HQ.

Certainly domestic and short-haul demand has dropped over the last decade and it's only relatively recently that CO has been demonstrating the potential of the 752 on transatlantic routes. Moreover, BA has tried this before:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Wilkes



User currently offlineVega From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 8004 times:

If BA ever went the route of the cattle car U.S. carriers and used 757s between Europe (LHR) and the major East Coast cities, why would I or anyone else for that matter choose them instead of say CO or US? People fly (and pay higher fares in many cases) BA for their service levels. I can't imagine a 757 configured with Flat Beds in Club World. If BA ever reduced their image to that level, they should do it with an offshoot subsidiary - maybe call it BA-Low.

User currently offlineAS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6161 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7891 times:

Didn't BA fly them to YYZ and JFK at some point from MAN or a smaller city. I remember seeing a BA 757 at YYZ in '97 when I was working for AC.

ASLAX



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineMCOflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 8683 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7882 times:

I remmer reading a trip report that stated BA flying to JFK via BUD on the 757.

MCOflyer



Never be afraid to stand up for who you are.
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11431 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 7844 times:

Quoting Vega (Reply 3):
I can't imagine a 757 configured with Flat Beds in Club World.

Why not? I'm sure there's some contractor that could install them.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20746 posts, RR: 62
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 7829 times:

Quoting Gilesdavies (Thread starter):
Many of these routes are operated several times daily so even if one of these aircrafts was replaced with an A32X or 757, it would maintain the frequencies and freeing up the other aircrafts for other routes.

Since LHR is a slot-constricted hub where BA carries a substantial amount of both O&D and connecting traffic, I see no reason whatsoever why they would want to waste a slot at LHR to run a 757 on a prestige high-yield route such as LHR-JFK, or some of the others mentioned in the OP. There are a number of other opportunites where BA could use their 757s without diluting the value LHR brings to the operation.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineTymnBalewne From Bermuda, joined Mar 2005, 951 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 7781 times:

Quoting AS739X (Reply 4):
Didn't BA fly them to YYZ and JFK at some point from MAN or a smaller city. I remember seeing a BA 757 at YYZ in '97 when I was working for AC.

ASLAX

I believe YYZ-JFK-BHX and BOS-JFK-GLA were operated by 757's

Quoting Vega (Reply 3):
If BA ever went the route of the cattle car U.S. carriers and used 757s between Europe (LHR) and the major East Coast cities, why would I or anyone else for that matter choose them instead of say CO or US? People fly (and pay higher fares in many cases) BA for their service levels. I can't imagine a 757 configured with Flat Beds in Club World. If BA ever reduced their image to that level, they should do it with an offshoot subsidiary - maybe call it BA-Low.

I always found it interesting that people will generally "pooh-pooh" the concept of a narrow-body across the Atlantic yet, when available will choose to sit in the single aisled upper deck of a 747, regardless of class of service offered up there.

C.



Dewmanair...begins with Dew
User currently offlinePositiverate From United States of America, joined May 2005, 1590 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 7770 times:

Quoting AS739X (Reply 4):
Didn't BA fly them to YYZ and JFK at some point from MAN or a smaller city. I



Quoting TymnBalewne (Reply 8):
I believe YYZ-JFK-BHX and BOS-JFK-GLA were operated by 757's

Ditto. I know I have seen a BA 757 in JFK before.


User currently onlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4509 posts, RR: 72
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 7767 times:

The B757 was previously used by BA on transatlantic flights between BHX and GLA and JFK, BOS and YYZ. BHX-JFK first operated with B763 and was later downgraded to B752. The GLA flight went GLA-JFK-YYZ.

User currently offlineMainMAN From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 2098 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 7684 times:

Quoting MCOflyer (Reply 5):
I remmer reading a trip report that stated BA flying to JFK via BUD on the 757.

No, it could only have been BUD-LHR on a 757, then a connection to a JFK flight.


User currently offlineBHXDTW From Eritrea, joined Feb 2005, 1092 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7654 times:

Its a good idea tho some of the cities mentioned either have very high capacity needs or are cities which require a high level of service...

take Dubai for instance... can you really see BA pulling a 747/777 or whatever they use now off this route when VS and EK are competing with their quality product ? (especially in J/F) ... Somehow, next to EK/VS widebodies I dont think a BA 757 would cut the cheese... I think this would go for BAH and AUH also, where BA are competing against EY and GF directly.

Accra... I believe they need high capacity on this route and also for Cargo and the amount of excess baggage..

And as stated before, yes BA operated the BHX/GLA - JFK/YYZ/BOS routes..

I flew the BHX-JFK routes about 6 times when it was around... I remember they had the new 'cradle' seat.. that was quite nice actually in J.. and they had Raid the Larder service too... dont know if they still do that.
Sat next to a nice guy who part owned shirley aquatics near Solihull... I also remember getting the upgrade as my aunt is a senior ticket desk agent at JFK for BA and wanting to sound like I was a regular J class travelller...

Joe  Smile


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2095 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 7404 times:

If BA was going to use any 757s on international services it would probably be from the regions, but as BA seems happy enough to maintain MAN-JFK as it's sole non LHR/LGW longhaul route then this seems unlikely.

I believe Willie Walsh has actually stated BA has no plans to use the 757 on longhaul services - I really should keep a log of articles that might have further use, as can't recall where I read this.

As for 757s leaving the fleet, seems to be a common misconception. BA maintains 13 757s for shorthaul work, alongside 7 767s (Common type ating for pilopts). BA has no intention of replacing the remaining aircraft as yet. Only shorthaul aircraft on order are the 10 IAE powered A320/A321 aircraft to replace the 10 CFM powered A320 aircraft originally ordered by BCal.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlineAvConsultant From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1360 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 7277 times:

I thought BA sold these to DHL?

User currently offlineZuluTime From United Kingdom, joined May 2006, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 7233 times:

No, there is no deal to sell the latter aircraft to DHL. They are not written down in value anything like enough to be attractive to DHL. The remaining 13 x B757s will be retained in the fleet and will be based at LHR T3 when T5 opens. They will be concentrated on routes to Spain and Italy which will remain in T3. T5 will be an all-Airbus affair for short haul routes.

User currently offlineIcebud From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 7223 times:

Ba did use to fly the 757's daily across the Atlantic. The Glasgow route flew to JFK then BOS, the Birmingham route to JFK then YYZ. They pulled the plug in autumn 1998 on both these routes. Don't know why though, because since that time, Continental took on both routes with much success and at GLA, chicago and Philadelphia are since popular.

User currently offlineGBOAC From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 221 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 7201 times:

Larnaca and Moscow are already operated by the shorthaul fleet. CAI and TLV are longhaul planes...and the answer for that surely lies in your opening paragraph: BA have a finite longhaul fleet. The fact they are deployed on these routes clearly shows they can command a premium for FIRST and Club World and it makes economic sense to do so - if those routes could be operated by shorthaul planes as profitably you can bet your life they'd free up the longhaul ones for India/China! But therein lies an interesting little conundrum...why is DME operated by shorthaul 767s or A320s? Because with the convertible seating they can fit 100+ CE pax paying around 1500 UKP each return (and they will indeed suffer it, it seems).

When T5 opens, the 757s will be confined to the Spanish routes operating from T3.

What I'd like to see BA have is a 'midhaul' fleet for the longer shorthaul routes. BMED manage the Club World cradle seats (in fact, an updated/enhanced seat in the A321s) on their Airbusses - BA could really do with something similar for the longer 'short'hauls (e.g. LCA, ATH, IST) and then maybe (with an appropriate premium) DME, TLV, CAI, etc. could still be usefully and profitably served in that way and free up longhaul planes for expansion. More chance of flying to ATH on a pig though, I fear...


User currently onlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7624 posts, RR: 17
Reply 18, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 7164 times:

Quoting AvConsultant (Reply 14):
I thought BA sold these to DHL?

BA retained their thirteen youngest 752s that at the end of this month will have an average age of 11.8 years. BA have already formally announced their future plans for these aircraft. When T5 opens in March 2008 the BA fleet of

Quoting GBOAC (Reply 17):
757s will be confined to the Spanish routes operating from T3.

.
Some of the lost capacity on other routes will be made up with the delivery of three new 321s that are being purchased to replace three of the old 320s originally ordered by BCal which are due for retirement.


User currently offlineSam1987 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 946 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 months 3 days ago) and read 7062 times:

Quoting GBOAC (Reply 17):
When T5 opens, the 757s will be confined to the Spanish routes operating from T3.

Will these be the only BA routes operating from Terminal 3 then? Any why don't they all fit in Terminal 5?



Next flights: LGW-LBA-LGW, LHR-SIN-SYD, SYD-BKK-LHR, LGW-GRO, GRO-CIA, CIA-MAD, MAD-LGW
User currently offlineGBOAC From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 221 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6994 times:

I should have said 'Spain and Italy' not just Spain...

Quoting Sam1987 (Reply 19):
Will these be the only BA routes operating from Terminal 3 then? Any why don't they all fit in Terminal 5?

T5 is not big enough for all BA flights until all the satellite terminals open a few years after the initial opening  Sad So T3 is going to be the oneworld terminal (close to T5) and Spain (IB codeshares) and Oz routes (QF codeshares) will operate from there  Sad

The fact they will dedicate 757s to Spain and Italy is just an ease of movement/usage issue I think and I can see it making good sense.

http://bapress.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/...X3NjZl95ZWFyPTU1JnBfcGFnZT0x&p_li=


User currently offlineABC9 From Ireland, joined May 2006, 203 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 6890 times:

Quoting Vega (Reply 3):
maybe call it BA-Low.

BA Lite or Diet BA anybody ?

I think if they were to go down the route of narrowbodies accross the pond it would be perceived by the flying public that services were being downgraded. One week a 744/777, the next week a 757! Would take a distortation of fact of Michael O'Leary proportions to convince the punters otherwise.


User currently offlineSpeedbirdEGJJ From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 430 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 6860 times:

Quoting GBOAC (Reply 17):
What I'd like to see BA have is a 'midhaul' fleet for the longer shorthaul routes

I see where your reasoning comes from, problem would be that there is certainly a finite number of routes on which there would be suffiecient demand or yield to make it pay. BY only configuring a small number of airframes in this manner, network planning becomes a logistical nightmare in the event of tech delays cancellations etc. On routes such as DME and IST it makes sense to operate a Short Haul 767. As someone previously said it allows us to maximise the number of Club seats for sale, and more importantly offers greater scope for belly cargo. This is why both these routes have the 767 on one rotation and an A320 on the other.

In terms of long haul ops with the 757's i dont believe it would be viable to operate to some of the dropped routes above. In the old days of the cradle seats in Club World (which on the 757 i would imagine to have been 2+2) and no WTP, the seats lent themselves far better to narrowbody ops. However, and i have no equations to back this up, even with a minimum of say 38 seats in J, the remaining capacity in W + Y and would be so small it would be unviable. That coupled with the reduced cargo, which remains very much an important part of a route profitability, means we shall not see the 757's outside Europe again.

Cheers
Ryan


User currently offlineWrighbrothers From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 1875 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 6761 times:

I don't think we will see 757's on LOng-haul, as they would only feasibly be able to operate with J and Y, mean J would have to be in a 2+2 config, and Y in a 3+3, which in totoal would be less than 150 seats per aircraft.
2) The aircrafts are in the process of being sold
3) There are only 12 or so 757's left
4) They can be used to better proffit European routes.

Quoting AS739X (Reply 4):
Didn't BA fly them to YYZ and JFK at some point from MAN or a smaller city. I remember seeing a BA 757 at YYZ in '97 when I was working for AC.

BA did these routes with 757's during the mid-late 90's :
MAN-GLA-JFK
BHX-JFK (Sometimes via GLA)
BHX-JFK-YYZ
GLA-JFK-YYZ-BOS

Quoting Sam1987 (Reply 19):
Will these be the only BA routes operating from Terminal 3 then

I think the BA Australia routes will be done from T3 aswell, though I'm not sure

Wrighbrothers



Always stand up for what is right, even if it means standing alone..
User currently offlineKDCA From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 6703 times:

What about BA developping unserved markets LHR-USA that don't seem to work from the American side of the pond?

LHR-BDL This is a route a lot of people talk about, but they say it would be hard to pull off for an American carrier.

LHR-HPN This route would certainly draw high yields although I don't know if the 757 could get out of there for the return, but maybe.

LHR-PIT, I know they served this before but could the 757 make it work?

LHR-CLE, if CO can make seasonal CLE-LGW work I've gotta think BA could do it from LHR.

LHR-CMH, does the bird have the legs for this?

Anyway just some thoughts, I realize LHR slots are extremely valuable but with cuts in domestic flying I think some of these could work rather nicely.


25 Post contains images Monkeyboi : Yup, alongside Qantas who will also be in T3 and who BA codeshare with. Same reason given for the spanish flights being out of T3, so they operate al
26 FlyCaledonian : Again, BA isn't going to fragment its small 757 fleet by having some aircraft configured for shorthaul, and some for longhaul. Plus, as others have s
27 David_itl : MAN 757s to JFK may have operated as many as 10 times in 5 years! The routes: BHX-JFK (later extended to YYZ) GLA-JFK (later extended to BOS) Passeng
28 VV701 : Of the above suggestions the only one legaslly possible is LHR-PIT. All the other routes are forbidden to British airlines by Bermuda 2 although AA o
29 CentPIT : Well I think BA should operate the damn route with a B757 and see how it goes! PIT can support a B757 no problem!
30 SpeedbirdEGJJ : Support in what sense?, passenger volume or profitability. Read some the posts above, the costs of a sub fleet are immense, when PIT failed with a 76
31 CentPIT : Yeah on a damn ERJ, hahaha...what a joke! The B757 would be profitable, US made profits on there last year of PIT-FRA (A330) and PIT-LGW (B767)! The
32 Post contains images SpeedbirdEGJJ : US obviously did oooooh so well ex PIT that they redeployed their aircraft elsewhere! when even your hometown airline drops international routes that
33 COERJ : A transatlantic 757 could also open up more gateways for BA in the US. From LGW 757 service would be great to BDL, PIT, CVG, CLT, CLE, BNA, etc.
34 CentPIT : I agree!! Well all my words were/are from the English language! BA still pays fees at Pittsburgh International!!!!!! Get it NOW?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Short Haul Planes On Long Haul Routes posted Wed Apr 12 2006 17:08:51 by Cedarjet
Could AA Use A 777-300 On Any Routes? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 02:23:33 by JAM747
News On MAN Long-haul Routes posted Wed Apr 3 2002 23:13:17 by David_itl
Delta Surveys Frequent Flyers On Long-haul posted Thu Oct 12 2006 21:36:45 by SLCUT2777
787 V/s 767 (All Series) On Long Haul posted Wed Oct 11 2006 16:58:37 by Eastern023
BMI To Install Lie Flat Beds On Long Haul posted Tue Sep 19 2006 19:32:31 by Jamesontheroad
Thomsonfly To Increase Legroom On Long-haul posted Fri Jul 21 2006 12:11:36 by BananaBoY
UA To Drop Some Long-Haul Routes posted Thu Jun 15 2006 22:01:05 by Nopeotone
Cardiff Gets New Long Haul Routes posted Fri May 5 2006 21:13:46 by Drinkstrolley
Onboard Massage Therapist On Long Haul posted Fri Dec 30 2005 20:01:32 by AAMaddog
Short Haul Planes On Long Haul Routes posted Wed Apr 12 2006 17:08:51 by Cedarjet
New 757 Long Haul Routes For BA posted Thu Aug 16 2007 05:47:30 by MasseyBrown
Routes That Delta Use Their 73Gs On? posted Sun Feb 26 2012 10:17:10 by highliner2
New BA Long-haul Routes From Gatwick? posted Wed Jan 12 2011 08:01:59 by 8herveg
What Routes Will AC Jazz Use Their Q400s On? posted Thu Sep 16 2010 15:41:20 by cyxuk
Short-haul Routes In Europe... On Long-haul Planes posted Fri Dec 14 2007 02:59:59 by BA380
BA Still In Talks With Boeing, Airbus On Long-haul posted Tue Jul 17 2007 16:14:46 by BoeingFever777
Do Continental Use Their 777s On Domestic Routes? posted Mon Apr 16 2007 19:50:44 by Impacto
Could AA Use A 777-300 On Any Routes? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 02:23:33 by JAM747