Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA's Business Class!  
User currently offlineThering From Brazil, joined Jun 2006, 530 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 4948 times:

I'm a frequent AA's business class flyer and really think they should improve it! The seat are old, have poor reclining, and in many planes the individual light is broken (ex. 777 flying GRU/MIA and the 777 flying GRU/JFK).

So, do they have plans to change their biz class?


146 319 320 321 332 722 732 733 734 735 73G 738 742 743 744 762 763 772 773 CRJ ER4 100 F50 F27 M11 D10
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33289 posts, RR: 71
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 4948 times:

AA just launched thier new business class two weeks ago. It will be phased in to their 763s and 772s through 2007.


a.
User currently offlineORDTerminal1 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 4939 times:

And here is a video that shows the new seat and its amenities...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUIVD8hZZBM&search=American%20Airlines

...IMO it doesn't look that comfortable.



717, 727, 732,733, 734, 735, 738, 742, 744, 752, 763, 319, 320, 340, F100
User currently offlineThering From Brazil, joined Jun 2006, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4877 times:

Thanks for the information!

The new seats seems to be great!
Do anybody knows if there is any plane already flying with them?



146 319 320 321 332 722 732 733 734 735 73G 738 742 743 744 762 763 772 773 CRJ ER4 100 F50 F27 M11 D10
User currently offlineTonytifao From Brazil, joined Mar 2005, 1036 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4848 times:

Yes. There is one, maybe two. I fly the same route you fly, MIA-GRU. You will see the new biz class seats on the the 763 first. Then on the 777s

User currently offlineMason747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 44 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4553 times:

Looks REALLY cramped. Really dated.

User currently offlineSean-SAN- From United States of America, joined Aug 2002, 772 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4497 times:

Ya it's crap. They should have just borrowed the design from their partner BA.

User currently offlineUAL777UK From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 3356 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4435 times:

Whilst i am sure they are comfortable, the colours look really bland.

User currently offlineAmirs From Israel, joined Dec 2003, 1333 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4401 times:

They should be very comfortable, they are a derivative of the LH long haul business class seats.
The color is definetly bland and unwelcoming.


User currently offlinePaul From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 374 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4381 times:

I personally think the seat is nothing to rave about, for a number of reasons;

1. Why would you want to be able to move the seat closer to the seat in front, its basically boxes you in and reduces the seat pitch and personal space, that guy looked rather claustrophobic when he moved it forward, his face and body was no more than a foot and a half away from the seat back of the seat in-front.

2. The seat is no way wide or long enough, especially for the Americans. This is an American Airline, not Chinese! Americans are the biggest flyers in the world, in terms of height and size. No offence guys, I love Americans but that seat will not be wide enough for the heavier set customers. You saw the size of the black chap in the video, he was in good shape and his shoulders were wider than the seat. So imagine if an obese person tried to fit into one of those things. (The seat looks very similar to the product for Cathay Pacific, and is only really suitable for average height flyers. I should know I flew in J with them and found the legroom inadequate and felt like my feet were trapped. (I am 6ft 3inch)

3. Yet again, an airline installs an angle lie flat seat, when customer satisfaction levels for angle lie seats are not exactly great.

4. Unless they want all of those nice IFE systems broken after the first week I would mount them on the wall infront. What happens when someone drops the damn thing? Its a laptop basically, and they certainly wont have the Titanium bomb prove case that some Laptops do.

5. And lastly the tray table is not even flat. So what that its slightly bigger, tray tables in a any new business class are adequate to write an essay or use ones laptop.

Go back to the drawing board AA because your product I think will not shape up!

Just my 2 cents.

Paul



Veni, vidi, vici.
User currently offlineAanyc From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4366 times:

Quoting SAN-" class=quote target=_blank>Sean-SAN- (Reply 6):
Ya it's crap. They should have just borrowed the design from their partner BA.



Quoting Mason747 (Reply 5):
Looks REALLY cramped. Really dated



Quoting ORDTerminal1 (Reply 2):
IMO it doesn't look that comfortable.



Quoting Paul (Reply 9):
personally think the seat is nothing to rave about



Quoting Paul (Reply 9):
Go back to the drawing board AA because your product I think will not shape up!

Maybe you need to sit in it first, before you pass judgement. Worked on this plane once and passengers like the new seats. A vast improvement on our current one. Sean from SAN ... tell us what type of biz class seat HP has ... that's right they don't.


User currently offlinePaul From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 374 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4345 times:

Are you mad?! Just look at all the things that are wrong with it. Besides that pax who said they liked it, probably just did not want to offend you. Why would anyone want to pay through the nose for a product that does not appeal to them? One reason why BA Club World attracts new customer, is because new flyers already know that the seat is one of the best there is before they get onboard.

You have to consider how long that product is going to be around. AA wont be able to afford to update their J Class for at least 10- 15 years firstly because of the way the market is shaping up for the future (high price of fuel) and because of the amount of debt yet to pay off. Airlines should be evaluating what strengths and weaknesses they have in the onboard product and making compromises where possible. For example, Thai and Malaysian have the best service in the sky so they can get away with having a lie flat J- Class seat. AA, although I am sure you personally are a good FA, certainly do not have the best F/A's (my personal experience) and should offer a better seat in order to counteract the shortfall in other elements of their product.

safe flying

Paul



Veni, vidi, vici.
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11983 posts, RR: 62
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4269 times:

Quoting Paul (Reply 11):
Besides that pax who said they liked it, probably just did not want to offend you.

Apparently not:

http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=581413&page=1&pp=15

Quoting Paul (Reply 11):
Why would anyone want to pay through the nose for a product that does not appeal to them?

Because it is still an upgraded product from American's current J offering, and it is still definitely light years ahead of Y on a 10-hr flight to Europe or South America.

In addition, what I think some here are forgetting is that one of American's major concerns in designing this seat was not only designing it for revenue customers, but also for frequent flyer upgraders. AA is commonly regarded and consistently rated as one of the best U.S. carriers for getting frequent flyer awards, and also as one of the bests for upgrades for FFs and VIPs. AA does not want this to change, because they have watched other airlines' FFs ditch those carriers as F cabins shrunk and upgrades dwindled.

So, that is why AA made the choice not to go with the full-out, flat-bed experience seen on BA and a few others. In addition to not wanting to canabalize their already-fairly-good F (especially Flagship Suite) product with the fully-flat beds in First, AA did not want to remove six seats from the cabin, shrinking J from 30 down to 25 seats. On many, many of these 767's flights, that would pretty much make the difference between a 5-million-mile Executive Platinum AAdvantage member getting upgrades to clear or not.

So, AA compromised by giving all customers (including FFs) an upgraded product, with a seat that is nearly-flat, and has other fairly good features, like an adjustable tray table, upgraded and movable PTVs, upgraded meals, duvets, etc.

AA is not as stupid as some of you might think: they are fully aware that given the choice between a worldwide-competitive J product that's impossible to upgrade into and an only-marginally-competitive J product that can be upgraded into with some frequency, many, many AA FFs (many, many of whom are extremely important and valuable to the company) would choose the former. So perhaps their decision was made with FFs interests in mind more than some here have indicated.


User currently offlineBphendri From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4199 times:

Quoting Paul (Reply 9):
I personally think the seat is nothing to rave about, for a number of reasons;

I personally think AA is nothing to rave about. Both times I have flown on American Airlines I have been had just TERRIBLE customer service experiences.

I will NEVER fly them again if I can avoid it.


User currently offlineJrosa From Brazil, joined Jun 2005, 367 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4079 times:

Quoting Bphendri (Reply 13):
I will NEVER fly them again if I can avoid it.

I share the same opinion.


User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4038 times:

Quoting Sean-SAN- (Reply 6):
Ya it's crap. They should have just borrowed the design from their partner BA.

Have you gotten a close look at the seat?


User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3360 posts, RR: 46
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4004 times:

Quoting Bphendri (Reply 13):
I personally think AA is nothing to rave about. Both times I have flown on American Airlines I have been had just TERRIBLE customer service experiences.

I will NEVER fly them again if I can avoid it.

Two times is certainly not enough times to make a statement like that. I've been flying AA as my prefered airline for 17 years, and that is, in large part, due to the customer service. Just check out my trip report if you want a feeling as my experiences.

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlineTismfu From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3985 times:

Quoting Thering (Thread starter):
So, do they have plans to change their biz class?

You must have a short memory. You asked this very question less than a month ago and got the correct answer (even with a real life photo) that yes, AA does have plans to change its business class product:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions...general_aviation/read.main/2847448

Quoting Paul (Reply 9):
The seat is no way wide or long enough, especially for the Americans.

It's longer than most (6'4" or 195.5 cm), including BA's (wider, too), which gets lots of complaints from taller pax.

Quoting Paul (Reply 11):
You have to consider how long that product is going to be around. AA wont be able to afford to update their J Class for at least 10- 15 years firstly because of the way the market is shaping up for the future (high price of fuel) and because of the amount of debt yet to pay off.

According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, the seats will pay for themselves in two years and have a planned life of 5 or 6 years.

I'm not saying these seats are perfect (they're not), but perhaps we should try 'em out on a long-haul flight before making assumptions as to their comfort.


User currently offlineBphendri From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3828 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 16):
Two times is certainly not enough times to make a statement like that.

I'm sorry, ONE bad customer service experience is enough to make a statement like that, either outside the aviation bussiness or inside it.

A company is there to serve it's customers, plain and simple. If they fail to do that, they will loose their customers bussiness, as they have lost mine.


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 59
Reply 19, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3704 times:

found this link on Flyertalk...

Looks like as if some "guy" decided to give the new seats a "try"....

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n276/jonnycFT_2006/d09cd413.jpg

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n276/jonnycFT_2006/9510fc77.jpg

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n276/jonnycFT_2006/064a56cd.jpg

big change from flying on a Presidential 747 AirForce-1 to trying this... biggrin 



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33289 posts, RR: 71
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3686 times:

Quoting Paul (Reply 9):
2. The seat is no way wide or long enough, especially for the Americans. This is an American Airline, not Chinese! Americans are the biggest flyers in the world, in terms of height and size. No offence guys, I love Americans but that seat will not be wide enough for the heavier set customers. You saw the size of the black chap in the video, he was in good shape and his shoulders were wider than the seat. So imagine if an obese person tried to fit into one of those things. (The seat looks very similar to the product for Cathay Pacific, and is only really suitable for average height flyers. I should know I flew in J with them and found the legroom inadequate and felt like my feet were trapped. (I am 6ft 3inch)

Yet another perfect example of how pictures don't proove one thing. Not only are AA's new biz class seats longer than BA's, they are wider, by a significant three inches. Any other dimensions or comfort features you'd like to incorrectly guess based on a picture?



a.
User currently offlineUAL777UK From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 3356 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3674 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 20):
Yet another perfect example of how pictures don't proove one thing. Not only are AA's new biz class seats longer than BA's, they are wider, by a significant three inches. Any other dimensions or comfort features you'd like to incorrectly guess based on a picture?

I have not flown on AA for some time and dont really intend to but what i would say is that BA's J seats may be flat, but your right, they are narrow and uncomfortable for the bigger guy out there!


User currently offlinePilot3033 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3661 times:

Quoting Bphendri (Reply 18):
I'm sorry, ONE bad customer service experience is enough to make a statement like that, either outside the aviation bussiness or inside it.

A company is there to serve it's customers, plain and simple. If they fail to do that, they will loose their customers bussiness, as they have lost mine.

I'm with you in that the service industries in the U.S. have gone to shit (Wal Mart/Southwest effect). Bottom line is the only important thing, blah blah cattle, blah blah. In this world of crappy service however, I see (at least in the U.S.) a few dirty diomonds in the rough; AA and COA.
American may not have the world best service, but they are good at what they do, and know how to keep people comming back. Now, don't get me wrong I've had my fair share of trouble (try waiting 1h 45m for your bags @ JFK after comming off LAX-JFK), but overall AA have given me nice F/As, timely service, clean aircraft (despite what some midwest local news channels might have you think), good FF upgrades, nice lounges, and again freindly staff from the check-in to the baggage claim*.
While one bad experiance can leave a bad taste in your mouth, it should never put you off something completly, you never know when someone is off, or if something will change that may make the whole thing a lot better.
-Matt
*regarding my baggage dely at JFK: as I understand it, the ground staff was understaffed during rush hour and priority was put on outbounds rather than getting bags to the claim. This is a song sung by every service industry so AA is not exempt, I just find they handel it better most of the time.



-Matt
User currently offlineBDL2STL2PVG From China, joined Jun 2006, 151 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3613 times:

I am one of those people that actually thought the current Biz seats were relatively comfortable. The only real gripe I had was that the legrest would not come up higher off the floor - it was only a few inches at best above the floor. Modifying that, even in the short term, would be an inexpensive way to make at Biz experience on the 777s (now flying some ultra-long routes) more acceptable.

The new seats do look tight, but looks can be deceiving. Also, I have no idea how tall the models are (nor do I know how tall W senior is) but the height of the seatback top certainly looks shorter than on the current seats. It seems that people of average height will always need to raise the headset for support (at least AA doesn't force you to lower the headrests for every take-off and landing as UA does).

My biggest concern is the entertainment system. It seems like a patch job with there being cords (headsets?, power?) visible in the photos inviting some exiting over the aisle seat to trip and take the whole player with them! Hopefully in the 777s the headsets and power system will be fully integrated into the system as it is today. Maybe on the 767, since each seat was not already wired for video, this was a consideration. I am looking forward to trying it to experience the real deal. Insofar as the current passengers giving it good reviews, have they run the new interior a/c on any overseas routes yet - that will be the big test form the discerning Business class customer. If I was getting on a domestic flight - even the Hawaii runs - I would probably be impressed, but the real money will be made with the intercontinental runs, those are the key customers.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA's Business Class! posted Mon Jul 24 2006 22:18:30 by Thering
New AA Business Class - First Picture Here posted Wed Jun 14 2006 20:36:48 by Fbgdavidson
New AA Business Class Launched Today? posted Thu Jun 8 2006 17:38:44 by AeroWesty
AA Business Class Upgrade posted Thu Sep 29 2005 16:17:13 by N725RW
AA Business Class posted Wed Sep 7 2005 23:46:21 by JN744
AA Business Class 763 - What's It Like? posted Sat Aug 6 2005 09:49:50 by JGPH1A
Question About AA Business Class posted Thu Dec 2 2004 19:06:40 by Quig
AA Business Class - Appalling posted Sun Sep 5 2004 20:41:48 by AnsettB727
How Would You Rate AA's Business Class? posted Mon Mar 22 2004 00:43:01 by Vkstealth
Service In AA's Business Class To Mexico? posted Sat Feb 21 2004 02:38:21 by Ssides