Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
787 Frighter? Possible Or Not?  
User currently offlineHa787 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 38 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3642 times:

will boeing ever come out freighter version of 787? would any cargo airlines take advangeade 787 advanages? what cargo carraier be the first operater of the aircraft

[Edited 2006-07-25 21:21:22]

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4690 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3636 times:

You should change the title of the tread...

Anyway, who knows if you can convert the 787, with its composite fuselage. That remains to be seen.

IMO they'll offer new-build Fs someday.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3636 times:

Boeing has not made many comments about the future of the 787 as a freighter that I have read. Most of them were along the lines of "we'll see what happens" types of remarks.


One Nation Under God
User currently offlineFCKC From France, joined Nov 2004, 2348 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3615 times:

Probably they will go ahead with a 787F , as Airbus will go ahead with a A350XWBF.
Even if the 787 is smaller than the 777 , it can be a strong competitor to the last one , and also Boeing will have to be carefull before launching the 787F.


User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3615 times:

A B787F would require higher thrust engines and the addition of a two-wheel centre bogey. I think we'll see these first in a B787-9ER and B787-10ER. Possibly a B787-11X. Once the suitable engines and landing gear are available, there would be little to keep Boeing from producing new build B787Fs if there is demand.

User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31259 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3590 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I imagine Boeing will build a 787F if for no other reason then the A330F should pretty much finish off the 767F line, so Boeing will need something smaller then the 777F.

User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3550 times:

One thing about the 787 (and other composite airliners) that may change the dynamic of the industry is that composites don't wear out in the same manner that metals do. If the airframe lasts longer, it might be usable for passenger service for a longer time with some refurbishment. Worn out airframes are usually where freight haulers get their mounts.


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5796 posts, RR: 47
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3545 times:

787F freither would complement the entire gamut of freither options from the 737 QC/converstions - 757F - 787F- 777F - 748F. The A350F and A332F will finish off the 767F but wouldn't those two Airbus products be competing against each other?


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineCARST From Germany, joined Jul 2006, 836 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3525 times:

The A350 will be assembled on the same line where they build the A330 now.


But B should build a 787F to have a complement of the A350F, like the 767F to the A330F.


User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5796 posts, RR: 47
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3525 times:

Quoting CARST (Reply 8):
The A350 will be assembled on the same line where they build the A330 now.

How is that possible when the A350 will have a wider fuselage than the A330 which requires new tooling?

[Edited 2006-07-25 22:14:15]


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineCARST From Germany, joined Jul 2006, 836 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3516 times:

A330 and A340 are assemlbed on the same line nowadays.

And the A350 will be assembled on the same line in some years. That is a fact i think.

A340 isn't that "small", perhaps no changes are needed or just small ones.


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4690 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3505 times:

Quoting CARST (Reply 10):
And the A350 will be assembled on the same line in some years. That is a fact i think.

Not really. The A332F will keep the line running when the A350 has already had its EIS.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21801 posts, RR: 55
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3478 times:

So Boeing is making a "frighter" to compete with "scarebus" now? Interesting....  biggrin 

In all seriousness, I think we´ll see a freighter version of the 787 somewhere down the line (has any plane not had a freighter version? - I can´t think of any). But it sometimes takes a while for them to develop.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5796 posts, RR: 47
Reply 13, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3463 times:

Quoting CARST (Reply 10):
A330 and A340 are assemlbed on the same line nowadays.

And the A350 will be assembled on the same line in some years. That is a fact i think

The A350 is supposed to be an all new airplane with nothing in common with the A330/A340. It would only make sense if Airbus intends to stop production of the A330/A340 and convert that line over for A350 production which needs all new tooling.



That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12807 posts, RR: 46
Reply 14, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3463 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CARST (Reply 10):
And the A350 will be assembled on the same line in some years. That is a fact i think.

It certainly would have been when the A350 shared the A330/340 fuselage cross-section. With the closure of the A300 line now announced, I suspect Airbus will demolish the old A300 production building and build a new A350 line there.

They will be hoping that the A332F will be keeping the A330/340 line open past the start of A350 production.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineAstuteman From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 10186 posts, RR: 97
Reply 15, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3391 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NYC777 (Reply 7):
The A350F and A332F will finish off the 767F but wouldn't those two Airbus products be competing against each other?

I wouldn't imagine so.
IIRC the A350F is a 90t hauler with 5000nm range, the A332F is a 64t hauler. Range - I don't know, but based on similar sized aircraft, I would guess c 4000Nm.

Regards


User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2102 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3339 times:

It will probably be a few years before there will be 787 freighters. The main issue is that freighters do not spend as much time in the air as passenger planes, so the cost of the plane itself is more significant and the cost of the fuel is less significant. That is why many freight companies utilize older used jetliners.

Most of the freighters purchased from the factory as freighters tend to be the largest planes, the 744F and A380F, as it creates new markets since they can carry larger and heavier cargo. The 744 is also cheaper than the 787 or 777. The 787 does have the advantage of being able to carry LD3s side by side, over the 767s it is replacing but there are plenty of DC-10s and MD-11s available cheap that can carry LD3s.


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4690 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3187 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 16):
but there are plenty of DC-10s and MD-11s available cheap that can carry LD3s.

The MD-11(F)s aren't so cheap because they are in high demand.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offline787engineer From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 572 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3161 times:

Quoting CARST (Reply 10):
A330 and A340 are assemlbed on the same line nowadays.

And the A350 will be assembled on the same line in some years. That is a fact i think.

A340 isn't that "small", perhaps no changes are needed or just small ones.

No, especially not with the A350XWB. When the A350 shared the same fuselage cross section with the A330/A340 that was always a possibility depending on demand, but with a new fuselage, they will definitely need a new line. So much of the tooling is dependent on the fuselage cross-section which is why both A and B try their best to maximize re-use cross-sections. For example the A300/A310/A330/A340 and the 707/727/737/757. Like Scbriml chances are the A350XWB will be built where the current A300 line is once it is shut down. Boeing will most likely build a 787F to replace the 767s and other similar sized freighters. The only question is whether it will be a 788 or 789 and when will it EIS compared to the A350XWB.


User currently offlineJonathan-l From France, joined Mar 2002, 506 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3144 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 16):
there are plenty of DC-10s and MD-11s available cheap that can carry LD3s.

For long haul, reliability is a key issue and is a main driver in purchasing a new aircraft versus converting an older aircraft.
The operating costs of a DC-10 (and MD-11, albeit to a lesser extent) are not very good compared to current aircraft, and maintenance and fuel can amount to quite alot of money when utilization is high ($5 to 10 million per year more than a modern aircraft). In the end, when you factor in reliability, purchasing a new aircraft can be the most economical solution.


User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5796 posts, RR: 47
Reply 20, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3138 times:

My question is would the 787 make a good freighter in the first place? What about utilizing it as a military tanker/freighter?


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineHanginOut From Austria, joined May 2005, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3102 times:

Quoting NYC777 (Reply 20):
What about utilizing it as a military tanker/freighter?

I get the feeling that this is the plane the USAF would like as a new tanker. It is the right size (777 is too big and the 767 can't carry two LD3 containers side by side). If Boeing would build it, I'm positive that there's no way the KC-30 would have a chance in the competition (even though it is a great plane). However, I think that Boeing is counting too much on the buy American factor and that we may see a surprise here and that the KC-30 may be picked over the KC-767.



Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
User currently offlinePolymerPlane From United States of America, joined May 2006, 991 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3046 times:

Quoting HanginOut (Reply 21):
It is the right size (777 is too big and the 767 can't carry two LD3 containers side by side).

What does military tanker have anything to do with LD3 containers? The current KC-135 is a narrowbody aircraft, even narrower than Boeing 707.

Cheers,
PP



One day there will be 100% polymer plane
User currently offlinePavlin From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3046 times:

Quoting A342 (Reply 1):

Anyway, who knows if you can convert the 787, with its composite fuselage.



I know. You can


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31259 posts, RR: 85
Reply 24, posted (8 years 4 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3015 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting HanginOut (Reply 21):
I get the feeling that this is the plane the USAF would like as a new tanker.

Actually, the USAF has expressed concerns that cutting holes into the airframe to allow the installation of blisters (for sensor packs and such) might cause issues (such as moisture might seep in between the blister and the fuselage along the edges or the attachment points).


25 Trex8 : special sigint/elint etc versions may be a problem due to these numerous cut outs on these types of aircraft but a purpose built tanker with a large m
26 474218 : If you can't cut holes in the 787 airframe how is Boeing going to install doors, windows, antennas, lights and all the other items that requires cuts
27 Stitch : All those doors and windows mount flush to the airframe, so they can be more easily sealed, I imagine. The blister packs need to be riveted into the
28 474218 : If you can't cut holes in the 787 airframe how is Boeing going to install doors, windows, antennas, lights and all the other items that requires cuts
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flying On One Wing. Possible Or Not!? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 22:48:53 by A346
A 1-Engined Jet Aircraft? Possible Or Not? posted Mon May 21 2001 07:29:25 by LAX
Is This The "New" 787 Tail Or Not? posted Sat Mar 18 2006 07:39:09 by Northwest717
BA: Do I Have A Window Seat Or Not? posted Wed Dec 13 2006 06:36:28 by N484ER
Question About 787 Production:possible Delay? posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:38:45 by RootsAir
Flying Or Not? posted Thu Sep 14 2006 22:26:13 by RichardPrice
Bae And Airbus: Untying The Knot Or Not? posted Wed Aug 30 2006 02:19:02 by Art
To Check Or Not To Check On US Airways To FCO posted Thu Aug 17 2006 00:27:57 by N174UA
Varig - Flying Or Not? posted Mon Jul 31 2006 22:10:12 by HangarRat
PAN Am The Pioneer's Will Restart Or Not? posted Wed Jul 26 2006 04:00:19 by Clippern7471sp