AZFlyer84 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 107 posts, RR: 0 Posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1760 times:
I'm wondering what the possibilities of seeing us airways in tul, i think they would do well, since wn doesn't go to canada, mexico, or many small western towns. It sure would lower fares, wn own's the tul-phx market by 85%. Prices on that route are a easy 300 rt. If you take the n/s on wn.
tul-phx x 2 cr2
tul-las x 1 cr2
tul-clt x 2 cr2
CentPIT From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 990 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1676 times:
Quoting Contrails (Reply 1): I'm sure there are more. On these routes there is currently no N/S service from WN (at least that I'm aware of). I think TUL would fit in fine in a post-merger US.
Dream on for PIT-TUL! PHL or CLT would Def. work in my opinion. Oh well, with the profit US posted, maybe they will add a few destinations in PIT that will make money! Like how about two daily year round flights to SEA!
Pittsburgh International: US Airways---160 daily departures! (52 destinations)
I'm sure there are more. On these routes there is currently no N/S service from WN (at least that I'm aware of). I think TUL would fit in fine in a post-merger US.
WN has 1 daily n/s LAS flight.
Quoting AZFlyer84 (Thread starter): It sure would lower fares, wn own's the tul-phx market by 85%. Prices on that route are a easy 300 rt. If you take the n/s on wn
OMG, $150 ow!! What an outrage!!! What do you want, $49 each way??
As for TUL itself, I always thought there (and OKC) could have more p2p flights than each have, but I guess relative location to hubs in all directions (DFW/DEN/STL/MEM) have precluded that to an extent.
Ken777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8478 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1545 times:
I don't think US will be looking at TUL for expansion. It's very well served by AA and WN, with other airlines like CO thrown adding their flights to hubs.
TUL is a pretty good airport though. It's easy to get to and easy to get through - to the point that I can leave home and get to ORD or DFW hubs easier than some people in the ORD or DFW can get from home to their gate for a p2p flight. The only pax problem at TUL is related to the AA employees trying to get on a non-rev flight - especially when they are taking their family somewhere on holidays.