Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ruling: Germany Liable For Midair Collision  
User currently offlineBuyantUkhaa From Mongolia, joined May 2004, 2915 posts, RR: 3
Posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2178 times:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5222194.stm

A [Swiss] court has told Germany to compensate Russia's Bashkirian Airlines over a 2002 collision that killed 71 people, most of them Russian schoolchildren. The court in Constance said Germany was partly responsible, since it had given the private Swiss firm Skyguide control over part of its airspace. The German court did not specify the amount of compensation due.

[..]

"The sovereign task of securing airspace was never effectively transferred to Switzerland," the court ruling said, adding that Germany remained liable.

German crash investigators concluded that a single Skyguide air traffic controller on duty had given the pilots just 43 seconds to act. The controller was fatally stabbed by a Russian man in 2004, in a suspected revenge attack.

Technical problems and staffing levels were criticised in the report by German investigators. The controller had told the Russian pilots to descend, while their onboard collision avoidance system had told them to climb to avoid the DHL cargo plane.

[..]


I wonder what happens if such a collision were to happen once the European Single Sky is operational (although I obviously hope such a collission will never happen again). What are the legal aspects of a Single Sky when countries still have legal sovereignty?

[Edited 2006-07-27 20:34:08]


I scratch my head, therefore I am.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4700 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2157 times:

Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Thread starter):
A [Swiss] court...

The court is German.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3763 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

The provision on which it is based is §839 BGB. According to this provision, an officer must compensate for claims which he is held liable for, and this is then taken over by the state according to Article 34 of the Constitution.

I must say, I was rather surprised by this ruling, but I agree with it.

I was surprised, because §839 BGB states that a claim cannot be brought against the state if there is another way of getting the claim compensated. This could have been done by suing SkyGuide. The court denied that option, because it held that the legal framework between Germany and Skyguide was unconstitutional. It was neither a contract bound by public international law, nor was it a legal normal contract.

Pretty bold by the court. This will most certainly be brought before the highest court. So expect this lawsuit to last for minimum 10 more years to last.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26795 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2103 times:

Yet another example of why ATC should never, ever be privatized.


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3763 posts, RR: 29
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2092 times:

Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Thread starter):
What are the legal aspects of a Single Sky when countries still have legal sovereignty?

A very interesting question. This will depend on whether we will have a supranational institution or just an institution introduced by ordinary public international law.

In both cases, however, this institution could be sued. In that case the subsidiary clause of �839 BGB says that if it is possible to sue this institution, the German state is not liable.

Believe me, if this ruling is held by the highest German court, a solution will be found by the German government very fast in order to prevent to be sued again  Wink


User currently offlineBuyantUkhaa From Mongolia, joined May 2004, 2915 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1931 times:

Quoting A342 (Reply 1):
Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Thread starter):
A [Swiss] court...

The court is German.

My mistake! Yes, it'd be hard to see how a Swiss court could hold the German state liable...

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 2):
The court denied that option, because it held that the legal framework between Germany and Skyguide was unconstitutional.

While I'm no legal expert, I'd be interested to know what that legal framework was.

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 4):
Believe me, if this ruling is held by the highest German court, a solution will be found by the German government very fast in order to prevent to be sued again

Maybe the Single Sky? It has come into force (at least the regulations 549/2004 till 552/2004). But what the legal liability implications will be, well, do we have a specialist on the forum?



I scratch my head, therefore I am.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus/Air France Found Liable For 1992 Crash posted Wed Nov 8 2006 13:25:13 by Gkirk
$25 Mil. Award Vs ATC For Midair. Ouch! posted Thu Mar 30 2006 18:38:19 by Eksath
Midair Collision Over Ravenna, Ohio! posted Fri Oct 14 2005 22:03:33 by ChiGB1973
Midair Collision In Renton posted Fri Aug 5 2005 18:40:13 by GulfstreamGuy
Is Delta Liable For Serving Too Many Drinks? posted Mon Apr 18 2005 06:32:51 by FlyingTexan
SXM Liable For Injury Due To Jetblast posted Thu Mar 24 2005 17:39:13 by AJO
Why No 747s In Germany Except For Lufthansa posted Sat Dec 11 2004 10:47:15 by Columba
Goose/Baron Midair Collision Photos! posted Fri Dec 10 2004 05:59:35 by WingnutMN
Warning...New Midair Collision Hazard! posted Wed Aug 15 2001 09:37:07 by L-188
Worlds Worst Air Disaster / Midair Collision? posted Mon Apr 16 2001 15:56:45 by Catpac