Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is NZ In Star?  
User currently offlineZone1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1036 posts, RR: 7
Posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3631 times:

I was wondering why Air New Zealand is in Star. It seems like most of the countries that were in some way related to the UK have their main carriers in oneworld: BA, CX, QF, AA, EI. I thought QF owns a stake in NZ. Why did they decide to go with Star and not follow QF into oneworld?

/// U N I T E D
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 11166 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3600 times:

There are competitive measures in the past that have restricted Air New Zealand and Qantas from partnering because of competition requirements on the transtasman routes. Although that is changing.

If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineAerokiwi From New Zealand, joined Jul 2000, 3065 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 1):
Although that is changing.

Not yet it's not. QF indeed used to own around 20% of NZ, tied in with JAL and AA and Brierly Investments, but eventually Brierlys became the primary shareholder with the rest floated on the sharemarket. Though I believe QF did maintain a holding until the late 1990s.

QF has been and remains a competitor, so it was convenient for NZ to link with the major opposing force, Star-carriers, in the mid 1990s. Also it was envisaged that originally there would be a large opposing block of NZ and Ansett as the opposition in New Zealand and Australia against Qantas.

Added to that is that Star was the first of the alliances and remains the largest of the three, with better coverage across Asia, North America and continental Europe.

User currently offlineSpinalTap From New Zealand, joined Mar 2005, 441 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 3341 times:

I wonder if it would make more sense for Qantas if they entered Star. It might reduce perhaps eliminate pressure from Singapore Airlines to allow them enter the Australia - US market?, they could also be friends with United on these routes and they would be in the same alliance as Air New Zealand.

"I get what they call a stipend, a stipend is like money but its such as small amount they don't really call it money"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is NZ's Koru In Such Bad Shape? posted Mon Mar 28 2005 03:39:53 by Aerokiwi
Why Is Altitude In Metres In China? posted Fri Nov 24 2006 22:19:14 by JezUK77
Why Is Qantas In Lima Now? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 18:11:06 by Notdownnlocked
AKL Airport Pic: Why Is A Plane In The Grass? posted Sun Oct 1 2006 00:55:43 by Dl757md
Why Is AY74 In KUO? posted Wed Jun 28 2006 15:39:48 by LordHowe
Why Is DAL1494 In OKC Tonight? posted Mon Jun 12 2006 05:30:42 by Starstream707
Why Is Delta In Financial Trouble? posted Fri Mar 24 2006 20:55:06 by FantasticFlyer
EI-SHN Why Is It In Storage? posted Mon Apr 21 2003 13:23:58 by F.pier
Why Is 1stClass In The Front Of An Aircraft? posted Fri Jul 13 2001 17:49:13 by OO-VEG
QF/CX Relationship/why Is CX In Oneworld? posted Mon May 14 2001 14:21:36 by Aussie_