Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
I Hate The 146!  
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12476 posts, RR: 37
Posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1821 times:

It takes a lot to make me dislike an aircraft; in fact, I like almost all of them. Except the 146. It's cramped, it's slow and I don't like the fact that, from November, the only way I can get out of Jersey, flying to London is on a 146 or an RJ100; BA is axing the Jersey - LHR route. It's JEA (now British European) that bugs me most of all - scratched windows, stingey with the jump seat, rarely on time; Cityflyer should be okay with the RJ, but it's still cramped; the 146/RJ was not designed as a 6 abreast aircraft and it feels very considerably more cramped than a 737 or 320 - or indeed 5 abreast jets like the M80 or F100. And then there's the view; if you're sitting anywhere from row 6 to about 14, you have an obstructed view - looking at an engine or watching the flaps come down in front of view - and can they do it quietly? The 146 is the only aircraft I know where the flap drive motor drowns out the sound of the engine.

It's not without qualities of course and this is a purely subjective view. It's a safe aircraft, it's good for STOL operations and it's rugged. But like Dr. Fell in the nursery rhyme, this I know and know full well, I do not like thee, 146 . . .

35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1672 times:

Kai,

Many board members heap praise on this airliner; after having flown Sabena from BHX-BRU on said airliner, I have to say, I agree with your comments.

IMO, it IS cramped, many window views ARE obstructed, and I thought it was rather noisy myself.

Interestingly enough, it's the plane of choice for our Royal Family.


User currently offlineAer Lingus From Ireland, joined May 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1658 times:

I remain absolutely neutral on this topic. I do like the 146 to look at but I can't comment on it from the pax point of view as I have never flown on one.
But be warned Kaitak (akersid !), you may come into a lot of criticism as I did when posting a similar topic on the MD-80.
Some people really are attached to a particular aircraft and act quite passionately about them !

Just some friendly advice

Martin


User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

Oh oh... I just booked my first flight for the Bae 146. I fly a Bae 146-100 in the last leg of a trip to San Francisco. The flight will be a United Express flight from Denver. I believe I have seat 2A, front row. What should I expect right next to the engines? I believe it's a long flight also, about 2 hours.


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineShankly From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 1543 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

We'll I've also just booked London Florence on Meridiana's 146's in November.

I've flown this bird before, Contiflug, London City - Berlin.

I have to say I was impressed. Although its a bit slow, the jet comfort on such a leg is more than compensation. Conti's 146 was 5 abreast and I can see that 6 would be a bit on the tight side.

Non-the-less it does a job that probably no other jet, of its size can do, and for that it must be admired.



L1011 - P F M
User currently offlineDT11K From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1621 times:

Yes the 146 is noisy, the undercarriage is noisier than the flaps, but it is fascinating whatching the mechanisms for the flaps move, and looking into the engine, it is'nt slow at all, for such a small aircraft it is relatively quick, i live only a mile or so from where they are built, and they fly over my house all the time, they are not much more noisier than say a 737-200 and alot quiter than a 727-200 so just be happy that you got too your destinations safely  

User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1620 times:

MEL, in the front row you won´t have your view blocked by the engines.
I did like my flights with Buzz on the Bae146, in their fleet the 146 offers more legroom than their B737´s. The plane is kinda loud inside, maybe because the engines are at the same level like the cabin. But for a short trip it is a nice experience .


User currently offlineB737-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1603 times:


That plane is great in my opinion. It's different. Almost unique.


User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6453 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (14 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1597 times:

"It's cramped, it's slow, scratched windows, stingey with the jump seat, rarely on time;"

Hey Kaitak, what does that have with the plane to do?
You just take a ride on a RJ-100 operated and maintained by Crossair instead. Wide dark blue leather seats better than anything you can afford at home, plenty of legroom all way to the back. You don't check the delay on the your watch, instead you adjust your watch on their departure time.  
Slow? I never went further than 600 miles on an RJ-100. It is 2-3 minutes slower in the air. But on take off here at CPH it saves even more time because instead of taxiing all way to the end of the runway it turns onto the runway half way down, and still it leaves plenty of runway to spare.
Obstructed view, yes, on some rows you see the engines, but then you don't have the wing to obstruct your view on beautiful planet earth. Flaps, yes, my eyes are glued to the beautiful flap mechanism inside the wing when flaps are rolling in and out. You don't see that so well on any other airliner.
If you go to London City Airport you won't have much choise except a vibrating turboprop. Because the RJ-100 has take off and landing performance unmatched by any other jet airliner. And its external noise is by far quieter than any other jet airliner.
On an airport without jetways you step in and out of it much like an underground train, not on some flimsy and much too steep stairs.
The RJ-100 is a great plane, but it is a very specialised niche plane. The worst thing about it is that it is too expensive. Of course the oldest 146s are getting pretty old today, but you cannot blame that on the plane. And if they show their age, then you can only blame it on the airline company which maintains them.
I love the RJ-100 at least as much as any Airbus or Boeing. I have flown on them many times, mainly between Denmark and Switzerland.
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39887 posts, RR: 74
Reply 9, posted (14 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1588 times:

I've never flown on one, but I think they look rather cool!  
Its unusual to see four jet engines on a small commuter aircraft. I happen to like all four engine jets.  

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Søren Geertsen


I think it looks cool!



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineMlsrar From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1417 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (14 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1584 times:

MEL, the Denver routes--most of them anyway, are operated under the UAExpress banner by Air Wisconsin corp. Their 146s have a 19" seat width with a 2-3 seat config and 34" pitch...beats Economy Plus for the most part. You'll love it from a ocmfort standpoint!


I mean, for the right price I’ll fight a lion. - Mike Tyson
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6453 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (14 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1574 times:

Yeah, Superfly, that's a beautiful picture of the Latvian Air Baltic short fuselage RJ-70 which is commutting between Riga and Copenhagen. By accident it seems that I always pass it on the finger when departing or arriving at CPH. It always looks a little dirty, just like on this pic too. Air Baltic co-operates with SAS and they seem to have the same relationship to soap and water. But otherwise it is a most beautiful plane.
Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (14 years 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1568 times:

Bae146´s can offer you a view like this,



Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Barry Rauck



Very nice if you like to see a little more of how a plane works.


User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1568 times:

Yes, I must say, Crossair's 146 cabin does *look* very good. In fact, there was an Aviation programme here in the UK, which was similar to a "Trip Report", on a Crossair flight out of LCY, can't remember the destination though.

The food looked great.


User currently offlineBSL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (14 years 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1545 times:

I've flown with the RJ for 3 times (Crossair + Sabena) and I enjoyed it everytime.

BSL


User currently offlineJasewgtn From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 823 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (14 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1525 times:

The 146 is the main aircraft of the Qantas New Zealand fleet and I have been in them many, many times and I do prefer the 733 of Air NZ.

QF New Zealand's are only 5 abreast however, how can you fit 6 abreat? I though 5 was cramped!

Jase


User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5294 posts, RR: 61
Reply 16, posted (14 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1522 times:

Aer Lingus and CityJet also fit 6 abreast!

Jeremiah Teahan



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (14 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1526 times:

The sole United BAe 146-100 is in a 3 x 3 config and is based out of O'Hare.. that plane only goes to Denver to do the Denver - Aspen flights...

the others are BAe 146-200 and - 300 aircraft. All aircraft are in the 2 x 3 seating configuration... seat 2A in the -200 aircraft is a good one, row 4 is where the engine cowlings start on the -200, row 6 on the -300. United Express gives you somewhat of a snack on all flights over 90 minutes, normally a salad and breadstick, or sandwich of sorts...

Hope you like it..



User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 18, posted (14 years 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1513 times:

This is my favorite aircraft!!! Seating has nothing to do with the plane! Its the airline! You probably rode on one with the 3 x 3 seating configuration. 3 x 2 is very comfortable, wider seats that the ones on the 737! The BAe 146/Avro RJ is also known as the "Whisper Jet". It is one of the quietest jets if not the quietest! Its one of the best Regional Jets ever built! Go to there site: http://www.bae.regional.co.uk

Wait until the Avro RJX comes out!



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineSamurai 777 From Canada, joined Jan 2000, 2458 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (14 years 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

I love the 146! I have flown on AirBC's BAe 146-200s several times, mostly from YEG to YYJ(Victoria, BC) and YVR and back, and once on an AirNova 146-200 from YUL to YQM(Moncton, New Brunswick).

They're great RJs to fly on! The noise level isn't that bad despite the four engines - it's about the same as the A319, actually. But you can actually hear the flap motors running usually when it's taxiing before takeoff and after landing. The seats are pretty comfortable, legroom isn't half bad, about 33-34" in pitch. All of AirBC's and Air Nova's 146s seat 5-abreast in economy and 4-abreast in Executive Class.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © John W. A. Merer


The photo above is an AirBC BAe146-200 at YVR. The "AirBC" title is right on the rear of the fuselage, which IMO, is a bit silly!


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 20, posted (14 years 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1510 times:

Ohh.....and by the way Kaitak, your not supposed to post topics like these. All they do is cause wars. If Johan finds this topic, he'll delete it. He even said that don't post topics that show hatred and messages that start wars.

Kind regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 13
Reply 21, posted (14 years 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1501 times:

My itinerary says I'm flying a Bae 146-100 Denver-Fargo. I guess it is the sole 146-100 in the UA/AirWisc fleet. Why would they have a 3X3 config on the -100 but only 2X3 on the -200s and -300s. Are the -100s any wider?


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineNwa747-400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1337 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (14 years 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

Have you tried the Avro 85?

They are much better than the BAE146. Much more quiet and the flaps are not so noisy. The engines obviously obstruct the view, but as aviation enthusiasts we just know not to let the ticket agents sit us in a row we can't see out of!!!!

The NW Jet Airlink Avro 85 had 16First Class seats, 69 Main cabin and is comparable to a smaller DC-9-10 is terms of capacity. The first class is a really nice bonus!

Are all of United Express BAe146s at ORD 3-3 or is it just one particular aircraft. The UAE BAe146 I was on was 2-3 and the Ansett Australia BAe146 was also 2-3.

They are still however a cool looking aircraft. I love the way the wings droop down...it makes it look kind of like dumbo the elephant!


User currently offlineJmc777 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2000, 234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (14 years 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1499 times:

I fly from LGW-NCE at least once a month, as I have friends who live down there and my ID90 allows me to fly Cityflyer. The service is fine but at 6 abreast it is too much if you are seated in 'A' or 'F' you have to sit sideways. seatpitch is fine but the seat width leaves an awful lot to be desired. To a point where you have to sit sideways to get a decent flight which can be tough if the person next to you is 10 tonne tessie!!!!!!

Also, I'm sure there was a lot of publicity regarding fumes in the cabin which affected the crew and passengers on a lot of flights, Air UK and Swissair to name two.

Regards
jmc777  


User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5521 posts, RR: 28
Reply 24, posted (14 years 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Yeah, they're a little loud (but that howling noise on flap deployment is good entertainment, especially when you watch 146 newbies get wide-eyed and worried); and the seats at the back with no window and a view of the loo... suck.

But, hey, look at 'em this way: they bring true jet service and speed to lots of places that simply couldn't have it before. And they're stout and reliable.

It was quite the thing when you could pop up and down the California coast on the AirCal and PSA 146s.

But if I booked a flight on one, and the cabin was configured 3-3, I believe I'd demand my money back. That's just plain wrong.

Ciao.



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
25 AC183 : MEL, the 146's are all the same width, but the airline chooses if they configure them with a tight 6 abreast seating configuration, or a roomier 5 abr
26 Greeneyes53787 : The BAe 146 needed modifications when it first came to the US. PSA worked well with the British and made good changes. I flew on PSA's 146s several ti
27 C172sb : If the sole 146-100 is based out of Chicago how does it fly DEN-ASE, seems to me that it would be based out of DEN. I have flown that route many times
28 Kaitak : . . . but I still don't like it. Looking at my first post, I should of course, have said that I mostly fly with Jersey/British European. We are losing
29 F+ Rouge : Hi, BA is right when he says that it is the airline and not the aircraft. I flew the BAe 146/Avro RJ with Sabena (operated by DAT), Lufthansa Cityline
30 ZRH : O please! If any aircraft is cramped, it only depends on the AIRLINE! I think you have never flown the AVRO RJ "Jumbolino" of Crossair. They are not c
31 SegmentKing : hey guys, just fyi-- i've been on every tail # of BAE 146 flown by Air Wisconsin, and I know the operations guys in Appleton, Wi office and O'Hare----
32 Post contains images Aer Lingus : I told you to prepare for the criticism !!! Martin
33 Post contains images Airsicknessbag : From a passenger´s point of view I like the ARJ85. I´ve flown on it with LH CityLine, and unlike any other regional plane, gives you the feeling of
34 PhilB : I've flown on all the original 146 series the RJ75 and 100. The latter, being an upgrade show some improvements over the early machines. The flaps are
35 BA : To me the Avro RJ doesn't feel like an RJ at all. I've been on many different RJ's including the Canadair Regional Jet. Well, to me the Avro RJ, doesn
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is Lufthansa So Keen On The 146/Avro RJs posted Tue Aug 30 2005 11:13:18 by Vfw614
Anybody Else Hate The A300? posted Mon Mar 1 2004 12:32:36 by ACEregular
FlyBe: When Will The 146's Go? posted Fri Feb 13 2004 19:02:00 by Capital146
Blocked At Paris CDG...I Hate The Fog! posted Fri Dec 12 2003 16:25:36 by UTA_flyinghigh
Do You Love/hate The MD-11? posted Tue Oct 7 2003 20:51:42 by Levg79
What Airline You Like/hate The Most? posted Tue Sep 2 2003 23:49:59 by Mx330
Do You Love/Hate The 707? posted Mon Aug 25 2003 20:16:33 by Aaron747
After The 146? posted Sat Feb 8 2003 19:34:45 by Shankly
Aer Arann And The 146 posted Sun Dec 30 2001 00:30:59 by EI133
I Hate The Aviation! posted Thu Dec 13 2001 20:19:09 by The_Greq