Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fate Of International Aero Engines  
User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6446 posts, RR: 2
Posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2318 times:

With Rolls-Royce and Pratt talking about making engines for the 737RS, the proposals made by Pratt and RR are different. Pratt is talking of a geared turbofan, while Rolls-Royce wants to use a three-shaft design for the 737RS engines. If IAE stays together, it will indeed be a hard decision to choose the design of the engine.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...technology/2003187675_pratt10.html

This article says that Rolls-Royce and Pratt may eventually join forces as IAE, but different proposals can split IAE up. If the 737RS uses a narrowbody design, it could become the first Boeing narrowbody to be available with three engine options (CFM, RR, and P&W). Before the 757 was unveiled, all Boeing narrowbodies used only one engine option, Pratt & Whitney. The 757 was actually supposed to have three engine options, including GE, but with the lack of interest from airlines for the GE engine, Boeing cancelled the offering.

What are your thoughts on this? Could the 737RS market support three engine manufacturers?


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2669 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2263 times:

Quoting 1337Delta764 (Thread starter):
Could the 737RS market support three engine manufacturers?

Absolutely. Just look at how many 737s and A320s are going to come up for replacement in the next 20 years. Certainly more than enough to support 3 engine choices.


User currently online1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6446 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2250 times:

Quoting PanAm330 (Reply 1):
Absolutely. Just look at how many 737s and A320s are going to come up for replacement in the next 20 years. Certainly more than enough to support 3 engine choices.

While that may be true, I have heard by some users that offering the 777 with three engine options was a mistake (I don't know why). While the 737 and A320 have been the most successful aircraft ever, is it really worth the cost to offer three engine options? The 787, which is designed to be a 767 and A300/A330 replacement, was chosen to be offered with only two engine options. The Airbus A330 however, is offered with three engine options, and so far only 574 A330s have been sold, and will likely not surpass the 767 due to the release of the 787 and A350. Yes, I know the 767-300ER was offered with Rolls-Royce engines later in its life, but that was mostly to keep British Airways, a long-time Rolls-Royce customer, happy.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fate Of Eads Under Global Stock Exchange? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 06:37:58 by N328KF
Fate Of BACON's 4 BAe 146 After March 07? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 23:45:46 by Vfw614
Volvo Aero Engines Service Shuts Down. posted Tue Nov 7 2006 22:16:13 by Alessandro
The Fate Of The 400 posted Fri Nov 3 2006 20:37:30 by Getdonnie
Fate Of The Tu-114s? posted Sun Aug 6 2006 11:27:56 by VirginFlyer
Fate Of The KLM 747-200/300s posted Sun Jul 23 2006 15:46:01 by MEA-707
Record Number Of International Passengers At ARN posted Thu Jun 29 2006 23:35:16 by Robbie86
GE On Development Status Of New Narrowbody Engines posted Sat Jun 24 2006 07:17:09 by Leelaw
Fate Of This Plane? posted Tue Jun 20 2006 20:00:34 by Sovietjet
Fate Of The 717 Prototyp? posted Fri Jun 9 2006 09:34:18 by 717fan