Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Odd ATC Transmissions  
User currently offlineAA54Heavy From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 189 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3048 times:

This is a random question but a few months back I was on a united flight, listening to channel 9, at phx, sitting in a long line, roughly 10-15 jets, waiting to take off. As I sat there and listened, the tower was clearing the jets for takeoff and then instructing the following jet to position and hold. However, what I found odd is that for roughly 4 or 5 of these exchanges after the jet was cleared to position and hold, it was instructed to acknowledge sight of the jet that was now rolling down the runway..something like "report company CRJ in sight"......then, after those 4 or 5, the rest of the position and hold instructions had no more need to acknowledge the plane in front on them in sight. It was a clear night, ceiling of maybe 9,000 feet and absolutely no fog or haze or anything.....any reason why this would happen and then they would just stop asking for that acknowledgement, or do they do this often...any ideas? thanks in advance

Roger that, turning to our "other" left
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 6058 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3015 times:

It is an indication that the following aircraft will be given its takeoff clearance with regard to confirmation of sight the preceding aircraft. In visual flight conditions, ATC can allow more aircraft to take off if the following aircraft accepts responsibility for traffic separation from the preceding aircraft. It is not as haphazard as it sounds, as all aircraft are roughly the same speed, following roughly the same track.

This tactic is quite common at PHX, an airport geared for visual flight conditions, (for obvious reasons). Then look at the opposite .... under IFR conditions, see how traffic backs up for departure.

Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3007 times:

As crazy as this might sound in order to apply visual separation between 2 aircraft the pilot must acknowledge sighting the other plane......so, thus the reason for the transmissions you heard, the controller had planned on using visual separation. Not often used like that on runways but it is the correct application.

Hope this helps.

Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Listening To ATC Transmissions... posted Tue Jan 23 2001 03:38:37 by AA777
Some Funny ATC Transmissions posted Sat Aug 19 2000 16:20:32 by Tailscraper
Odd-Occurence On JFK ATC posted Fri Apr 8 2005 20:30:57 by UN_B732
London ATC/Hold Or No Hold posted Wed Nov 15 2006 02:40:47 by P3Orion
Old IND ATC Twr Demolished posted Tue Nov 14 2006 18:52:54 by Chase
Article On ATC Controllers (last Month) posted Tue Nov 14 2006 04:43:53 by Timz
Odd NW 747 Routes In 1991 posted Wed Nov 8 2006 18:40:44 by AlexInWa
Why Do Airlines Offer Such Odd Routings posted Sat Nov 4 2006 07:17:32 by RJpieces
ATC System Changes By 2016 Article posted Fri Nov 3 2006 16:29:33 by IAHFLYR
What's Up With Brazilian ATC? posted Tue Oct 31 2006 04:19:28 by Tonytifao