Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Preemptive Strive-cancellation Prep  
User currently offlineTripleseven From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 118 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 12 months 5 hours ago) and read 1037 times:

So, as any of you who read my SFO-SAN trip report know, I just had a bad experience with a cancellation on the UA.
See, next week, I'm booked SFO-EWR on UA 0074. So, I've been checking the flight daily to see what's going on with it-is it on time etc. Today, the flight was cancelled. Had I flown today, I'm afraid I might have ended up high and dry like my last trip.

So, let's brainstorm here. What can I do in advance to prepare for a potential problem?

If it matters, I'm travelling first class.




4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGreggj From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 12 months 5 hours ago) and read 1016 times:

that's pretty simple...fly continental.

btw...I've NEVER heard of UAL ever leaving an F-class passenger 'high and dry'

and like you...I travel quite extensively.


User currently offline777x From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 12 months 5 hours ago) and read 1013 times:

Know the other flights from United and other airlines that are leaving around the same time, that way, if something does go wrong, get the agent to rebook you and interline if required. Also, if you are prepared to fly to LGA or JFK instead of EWR let them know.

If you have a pager or cell phone, sign up for UA's paging service for the flight, and get it to send a confirmation a couple of hours before the flight, so you have early warning if anything is looking bad.

When you check in ask the csr to give you any information they have (on time/ delays/etc). If things are looking suspicious, get them to make you a reservation on another flight in case you get stuck.

Generally, you'll get through it if you know what to do and make sure that the agent covers all bases (interlining, alternate airports, etc)

hope that helps




User currently offline777x From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 12 months 5 hours ago) and read 1010 times:

One more thing...

Remember that a little courtesy goes a long way, when dealing with the CSR's, who may be a bit edgy from dealing with all the displaced customers, a customer that is nice and understanding usually gets what the're after. But, if kindness fails, then be prepared to escalate, talk to a supervisor, etc.


Regards
777x


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 1001 times:

The problem at SFO continues to be the very closely spaced runways that make the airport extremely sensitive to reductions in the number of aircraft it can handle. That "trigger" is their loss of the ability to conduct "visual" approaches, usually anything less than a 2,500' cloud ceiling and/or anything less than 5 miles visibility. When they lose visuals, SFO's arrival rate goes from 60 an hour to as low as 30 an hour. Imagine the sudden backlog of cars on a six-lane freeway if three lanes of capacity disappear suddenly. The obvious critical difference here is backed up airplanes can't go bumper-to-bumper (in the air), so the delays ensue. Airborne flights turn circles, awaiting their shot at the airport, and anything headed to SFO that's still at its takeoff airport awaits their turn--not unlike a metered freeway ramp.

One of the things airlines (all of them) do when airspace capacity at an airport is radically reduced is to start prioritizing the use of the slots it has available. If there are flights that are lightly-booked, those will get canceled to allow a full(er) flight to operate, and minimize the number of inconvenienced Customers.

The same 2,500'/5 mile conditions at OAK, SJC, or SMF have virtually no adverse effect on creating delays (and their predictable side effects) given the lower traffic counts compared to SFO, and the fact that they have greater distances between any parallel runways in use there.

If your travel plans can't tolerate risking a delay/cancellation, and anyone has non-stop service off OAK, SJC, or SMF to where you want to go, I'd suggest that.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Video On Sky Europe Flight Cancellation At VIE posted Mon Aug 24 2009 09:00:41 by Tobias2702
Airlines That Charge "Highest Cancellation Fees" posted Wed Jul 8 2009 13:06:42 by Crosswinds21
First Class Meal Prep Question... posted Thu Jun 11 2009 19:57:09 by TylerDurden
First Boeing 747-8 Order Cancellation? posted Thu Apr 23 2009 16:54:57 by JohnClipper
Confirmed Reservation Cancellation posted Thu Apr 16 2009 17:41:52 by Levg79
Spirit Enforces Cancellation Policy On US1549 Pax posted Wed Jan 21 2009 08:32:17 by Jmc1975
Impending 787 Cancellation posted Thu Jan 15 2009 05:32:50 by Swallow
EK202/31 Oct JFK-DXB Cancellation posted Sat Nov 1 2008 18:19:31 by Globalflyer
LH DEN-MUC Permanent Cancellation posted Tue Oct 21 2008 17:11:23 by FlyNTE
First 787 Cancellation-from Azerbijan Airlines posted Thu Aug 7 2008 11:26:51 by Beaucaire