Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Scary Landing Approach - Question?  
User currently offlineFlymad From South Africa, joined Jun 2006, 207 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10653 times:

About 10 years ago (can't remember exactly when) I was on a flight from CPT to JNB on what was then Flitestar (a now defunct airline) on IIRC an A320. Approaching JNB we flew through a fairly heavy thunderstorm making the ride quite bumpy. On final approach to 03L , and sitting at a window seat, I could see the SAA maintenance hangers coming up, when suddenly the a/c seemed to just drop out of the sky. I was aware of the ground coming up to meet us very fast! Overhead bins popped open, screams in the back cabin and then the sound of the engines spooling up again and really "screaming" - a lot louder than on a normal t/o run. We literally flew down the runway (very low) across the face of the terminal buildings and about where the Delta ramp is now the nose lifted and we took off again (at no time did we actually touch down). The a/c then circled the field, levelled off and then the PIC came on to apologise and advised that the "weather was not conducive to a landing. We the made another approach and finally landed on a runway that brought us in OVER and AWAY from the terminal buildings - a totally different direction the the original approach. It took a hell of a long time to taxi back to the gate!
This incident has always intrigued me and my question is - Did we experience windshear on the initial approach and on what runway did we eventually land?
I live quite close to JNB and am only aware of a/c taking of in a northerly or southerly direction.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineA3xx900 From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10632 times:

Sounds like windshear to me. In T-Storms WX the winds can change very fast, so that the approach got changed.
JNB has two parallel runways, 03R/L and 21R/L. Seems to me that on your first approach you tried to land on a southernly direction on 21R, which has the terminal building at the very end of it. Then you changed approach to 03R OR 21L, which is far away from the terminal and you might get the impression that it leads you away from the terminal buildings. I'm not sure wether you changed directions from southern to northern approach, since taxi times from 03R/21L are in both cases pretty long.

Why is 10 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9.
User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 10827 posts, RR: 76
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 10528 times:

Very hard to tell for what reason the go-around was done, however it is standard policy in most airlines to initiate a go around if predefined exceedance in bank, pitch (nose up or down), airspeed, sink rate, or ILS deviation is noted.

I have also had to do around in similar conditions in heavy rain not being able to see the runway at the minima, an inch or more of water on the windscreen makes seeing the runway impossible from the front where passengers can see the terminal from out the side.

We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently offlineCEO@AFG From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 262 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 10445 times:

Sounds like windshear. Have experienced this in UAL's B733 simulator in Denver. The procedure for correcting this, is to go to Max continuous thrust, basically yanking the thrust levers as far forward as possible, holding a specified nose up attitude, and hope for the best.

There are a few accidents attributed to windshear, notably the Delta Fl191 L1011 accident at DFW in 1985. http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/v...85®=N726DA&airline=Delta+Air+Lines

"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue." Steven McCroskey, Airplane!
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 7561 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 10246 times:

I would assume:
1. Windshear/extremely gusty crosswind.
2. Given that this happened 10 years ago and I don't know when the cross runway was closed, I would assume from your story that you landed runway 15 (now a taxiway)... as that was the only runway that would take you away from the terminal.

Just my guesses...


When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineZakHH From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 10161 times:

I guess JNB is THE place to fly to if you like such landings. The usual daily thunderstorms during summertime and the height of the airport make a good combination for a really bumpy approach. I've been there a couple of times, and none of the landings was really smooth (though not nearly as spectacular as yours obviously was).

Takeoff runs feel also a bit weird, as rotation starts a lot later than usual, due to the height.

What you described sounds like a windshear. When the pilot noticed the increased sink rate, he probably gave full thrust. I doubt that the engines were screaming louder than during a normal t/o run, though. That impression was probably a bit wrong due to the stressful situation.

From my basic understanding of flight physics, I would also understand while you made kind of a low pass over the runway, before the pilot lifted the nose again. If the abort came on short final, immediately pulling up would have meant a certain risk of stalling the a/c, especially if you would hit another frontal windshear upon lifting the nose (pros, flame and correct me if I'm wrong here). Plus, once full thrust is applied, the a/c would usually act much more stable than during an approach.

So it seems the pilot did just the right thing.

There is a video of a TAP approach (A321, IIRC) being aborted due to heavy crosswinds. The a/c is shaking unbelievably, until the pilot applies full thrust again. Could give you a basic idea of what your approach may have looked like.  Smile

User currently offlineBigJimFX From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4914 times:

ACTUALLY! This is probably due to a "microburst". This is what caused DL 191 to crash at DFW a while back. Granted a microburst is a kind of windshear. It's basically a strong down-surge of wind occurring at the dissipating stage of a thunderstorm. When the plane enters the initial part, the airspeed increases which makes the PIC decrease power. Then the airspeed falls and engine power cant be increased fast enough to avoid an accident. Consider yourself lucky!

I'd like to thank me for flying Me Airways...
User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1757 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days ago) and read 3966 times:

Quoting BigJimFX (Reply 6):
ACTUALLY! This is probably due to a "microburst".

Agree with you. perhaps its the microburst.

We had something similar while on a flight from CCU to BOM on S2. the a/c feel from the sky and we initiated a go around. Ladies and kids shrieked while men went into crouching positions.

I asked the pilot on my way out if it was a microburst and he seemed to acknowledge politly...

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12362 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3814 times:

Quoting BigJimFX (Reply 6):
ACTUALLY! This is probably due to a "microburst". This is what caused DL 191 to crash at DFW a while back.

I agree, but in this case it sounds like the pilot was able to fly in ground effect long enough to recover enough airspeed to go around.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LaGuardia Rwy 31 Approach Question posted Tue Mar 28 2006 16:10:29 by Cpos
TAP Scary Landing Video (August 2004) posted Fri Aug 26 2005 21:38:19 by CORULEZ05
Satellite Photo Of SAN/Plane On Approach Question posted Wed Apr 20 2005 04:27:26 by PanAm747
Scary Landing At LHR posted Tue Dec 14 2004 23:04:03 by Chrisjdurber
DCA Approach Question posted Sun Aug 15 2004 20:51:12 by Wilco
SJC Approach Question posted Thu Mar 4 2004 04:18:06 by Luv767s
Scary Landing/takeoff..... posted Thu Sep 5 2002 23:01:51 by Boeing nut
Most Exciting Landing Approach In U.S.A. posted Fri Jul 19 2002 17:46:54 by DIA
Heathrow Approach Question posted Sun Apr 21 2002 21:45:32 by Bizzell0
Landing Rights Question posted Mon Mar 18 2002 21:17:35 by KLMBlue