Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
So Boeing Is Just Waiting For An Engine For 737RS?  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4121 times:

I don't know if they are rumors, but I hear that Lockheed's QSST proposal is not using standard jet engines, that the combustion chamber is pulse-based, meaning they are not burning fuel all the time. This could translate into more range, more payload or less fuel costs.

I wonder if Boeing got a hold of that engine and derated it to subsonic flight, would 737RS rape 787 in terms of fuel efficiency? Think about it, if an engine was made to fly supersonic with much less fuel usage than previous generations, imagine what a subsonic variant could do...transition would be similar from SC to 787. Even changing the engines on 738/739's could be a 757 replacement in both range and payload (maybe just frieght not pax). This type of engine could allow for longhaul LCC's.

Or go the other way and have LCC's save almost half in fuel costs, the plane would just be lighter, maybe even add access to more airports. Possibilites are endless right?


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31440 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4068 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I believe "pulse detonation wave" engines are optimized for high mach numbers. Such engines are rumored to power the rumored "Aurora/SR-71RS".

Going from statements from Boeing, they do seem to want to wait to release Y1/737RS until a new class of 25-35K lb thrust powerplants are available that will provide significant fuel efficiency, noise abatement, and emissions control improvements over the current available powerplants.


User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4026 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
I believe "pulse detonation wave" engines are optimized for high mach numbers. Such engines are rumored to power the rumored "Aurora/SR-71RS".

Just like there are many types of turbofans, there are many versions of pulse engines. I was talking about deflagration engines (subsonic burn like in a piston-cycle engine) not detonation engines (forced supersonic burn).

The only difference between a pulsejet and a ramjet is the fuel burn rate, ideally, since flow through the burn stage is not supersonic. The only difference between a ramjet and a jet engine is the turbo machinery of compressors and turbines. In otherwords the ramjet is just a flying combustion chamber, if you will. So exchange the pulsing fuel spray and igniter with the regular combustion chamber in a jet and voila: pulsed-tubojet. Add a bypass and we have a pulsed-turbofan.

I've done the math for a ideally practical senario involving a twin engined 100pax airplane for cruise at M0.75, I'm looking at a 52% fuel usage reduction than the verision with a traditional turbojet with BPR = 5. I think it's candidate for 737RS.

If you didn't understand something let me know.

[Edited 2006-09-01 21:21:49]


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is USAir Waiting For Castro's Demise? posted Wed Sep 1 2004 14:16:24 by Pilotcoex
I-Air TYS/CAE-MCO...just Waiting For The Buses? posted Wed Aug 18 2004 23:50:11 by SHUPirate1
So There Is No Door Opening Laws For F/As! posted Mon Jun 30 2003 06:12:38 by Flyboy80
What Is The Weight Of An Engine? posted Tue Apr 3 2001 21:10:37 by SAS_A330-300
Is The A310 A Bad Plane For AR Or Just In General posted Tue Jan 3 2006 02:13:30 by GusNYC
When Is A Manufacturer Paid For An A/c? posted Mon Aug 1 2005 07:18:28 by Art
Boeing Waiting For MAS Response On 737 Proposal posted Fri Apr 1 2005 05:36:21 by Jacobin777
Is The 717 Still An Option For AM? posted Sat Jan 8 2005 16:12:36 by 717fan
So What Is A Jet Ranger Going For These Days? posted Fri Jan 16 2004 13:41:16 by L-188
Boeing's Next Number For An Aircraft... posted Sat Nov 17 2001 05:06:51 by Gmonney