Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO,NW,TW To Asia @ PDX  
User currently offlineAirnondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2035 times:

Anyone confirm that CO is considering picking up the NRT service out of PDX? I heard the Port Authority was courting them. The fact that they are adding another PDX-EWR and could extend their AS and AW codeshares to act as feeders boads well for this allignment. This would also help CO's international credibility, right now they only offer NW codeshares to asia if you're west of houston.

However, I could also see NW or even TW considering picking up the PDX-NRT route, either could extend their current AS codeshare as well.

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

I don't see why PDX could not function as a mini-hub in the very strictest sense of the word if it had enough feed. I think that this would be a smart move for Continental, especially.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineOkforalll From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1866 times:

Don't hold your breath. None of these carriers have the feeder routes to PDX to make a NRT flight profitable. It's apperant that the PDX traffic alone didn't produce the passenger loads for Delta or they would not pull off the routes. Delta also had feeder routes from the East and South to help fill the airplanes but from the decision unsuccessfully.

User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1866 times:

It'd be great if it were to happen, but I doubt it. If it didn't work for Delta, it probably won't work for anybody else.

User currently offlineAlexinwa From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1845 times:

One thing that DL doesn't tell the pubic is a main reason they dropped PDX was the service the fact that as many as 20 people werent allowed into the US by the customs agents in Portland. Reasons that no other city would of denied them, Portland was. This is a major reason DL dropped this service. The Port was warned long ago and DL finally did it.


You mad Bro???
User currently offline777guy From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

This is in reply to post byAlexinwa,I have lived in Atlanta for many years and have watched Delta.They only do things based on the financial side of things.I seriously doubt they would leave PDX because of these 20 people.Bottom line,if it don't make money they don't fly.

User currently offlineAirnondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1762 times:

According to Dl, the flights were usually quite full (>75%). Rather the reason for dropping them was the $ paid per passenger wasn't high enough.
To explain the higher number of bargain shoppers, look at the routes feeding this service, JFK, LAX, ATL, SFO, YVR, SEA... All of which have multiple direct asian flights for the high paying business traveler to choose from, so naturally why would they choose to have a layover regardless of the airport.

Now, as stated by Delta, PDX local traffic was filling the NRT flight 30%-40% and much of these passengers pay premium fares for the direct flight or biz/first class. Now factor in a carrier willing to code share with AS, and you get feeder flights from places with no direct t-pacific service like Boise, Spokane, Oakland, Eugene, etc... With each of these feeders providing a few biz passangers each, plus travelers from the carriers own hubs (in the CO example you get another t-pac option out of IAH or EWR). I'd bet money the final result would be a plane full of profitable passengers.

One more note, Delta did state "the INS problems did factor into our decision". The INS @ PDX is now going through a major overhaul, with the director resigning. Lets hope the new team learns to loosen up.

~M2C


User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1488 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1753 times:

The fact that "these twenty people" were turned away at PDX probably was a major reason behind DL's decision. PDX became knows as Deportland. Then, many Japanese corporate travel agents (where a lot of the real money is) advised clients and businessmen not to use PDX as their US gateway. That's where the trouble begins ...

User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1488 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (14 years 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1712 times:

If DL gets its way, its taking its Japan slots with it away from PDX. How are CO and TW going to get the slots? NW probably could because I believe it has close to unlimited access to the prized Japanese market - UA, ANA and JAL are the only other passenger airlines in this position.

User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (14 years 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1709 times:

If NW gains another slot to Japan, it will not go to Portland, but probably to Memphis. Because of the new world runway opening, NW now can operate flights that they otherwise would have not been able to. Northwest also has the feeder traffic to make this flight work. I wouldn't be surprised that if NW gains the authority, this is the route that they will operate.

BTW, NW does not have unlimited route freedom to Japan from the United States. They must still gain government authority from the United States and Japan. They DO have unlimited routes out of Japan to Asia, which is why you have seen new routes from NW like KIX-KHH (last year) that probably would not have been operated before the agreement.

NWA Man



Create your own luck.
User currently offlineExusair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 684 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (14 years 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1705 times:

DL is moving the NRT flight to JFK. They are also moving the NGO flight to LAX. About a year ago Delta was granted route rights for PDX-KIX, which were never used. In addition the PDX-SEL flight which DL discontinued a year ago is still up in the air. The Asian economy seems to have recovered. I wonder why DL is not flying these flights out of LAX, as there is enormous local feed, not to mention cargo traffic to these cities.

User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1488 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (14 years 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 1683 times:

DL has a ton of unused Asian routes (not sure if in all cases, they still have the rights:

PDX - Osaka, Japan
PDX - Fukuoka, Japan
PDX - Taipei, Taiwan - Bangkok, Thailand
LAX - Hong Kong
HNL - Tokyo, Japan

to name a few

plus

FRA - DEL (resuming next year)
PDX - NRT, NGO being moved as discussed previously


User currently offlineAirnondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (14 years 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

There are ways and means for PDX to recoupe asian slots, especially a single NRT slot for an airport that used to have 5+ daily asian flights. If an airline were to agree to take up this route and the port authority were to approve, a slot would be approved with little to no hassle.

With Intel, Nike, Columbia, Epson, etc. PDX has a number of asian biz travelers that will be stuck in layovers if a replacement carrier isn't found. With pressure from these VIPs (worthy or not) both sides of the Pacific would quickly agree to a slot, the only missing piece is the carrier.


User currently offline777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (14 years 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1638 times:

Continental's growth over the next 5-10 years will be strictly out of the hubs. If anything, CO would operate a daily 767-200 to NRT. The traffic would have to be strictly O/D, but I could see it connecting with at least 1 flight from CLE, it is a more logical connection point than IAH or EWR. Still, it isn't gonna happen.

User currently offlineOrlo3 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (14 years 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

Delta may have said that the INS problems didn't affect their decision much, but they also said they were pulling the flights because they were getting more tourists flying the route instead of higher paying business pax. Because of businesses in asia telling their employees to stop flying through portland on Delta due to the INS situation, It would stand to reason that the INS problems had more to do with Delta pulling out of PDX than they have led on.

User currently offlineDarrell From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 236 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (14 years 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1575 times:

The INS at "Deportland" was a major factor in Delta's decision. The INS problem is currently being resolved with the resignation of the INS Portland chief. I believe Delta's decision to pull out of PDX was irresponsible and short-sighted. With the asian market in recovery and the huge explosion of Japanese businesses in Portland, I can guarantee that someone will eagerly take over those abandoned routes out of PDX. By the way, Delta does not own the rights to use the gates at PDX if they leave. The International gates at PDX are owned and operated by the Port of Portland. The Port is currently actively seeking replacement carriers to use the International terminal. I havent heard anything about CO or NW, but I have heard rumors about Korean, Japan Airlines and China Airlines.


those who have no vices have very few virtues
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 16, posted (14 years 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1567 times:

While we are on the subject, how did this many Md-11s get to Portland when the picture below was taken? I thought there were only 2 MD-11 flights from PDX to Asia. Could this possibly be related to the fact that the flights continue on to CVG and ATL, and some MD11s are just back from those cities while others have arrived from Asia? If so, then how does one explain the fifth MD-11? Could it be a delay? I was just confused by this picture:

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Chris Coduto


I hope PDX gets back a flight to Asia. I think a flight there with a combi aircraft should do the trick if the area does not have enough passenger base to fill an entire 747.

Aaron G.



User currently offlineDarrell From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 236 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (14 years 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

PDX usually has 4 MD-11's in at one time (usually between 10:00 am and 2:00 pm), but its not uncommon to have 5 or even 6 in at the same time. every once in a while one of them will be an L-1011. (Luckily, the Hawaiian DC-10 that usually parks in the same place (departs at 9:10 am) was already gone...


those who have no vices have very few virtues
User currently offlineOrlo3 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (14 years 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

It was announced this weekend that Delta has approval to transfer the asian slots to other airports. Thus, PDX has lost the flight slots to Asia. Yes we did only have two flights to asia a day, but we saw four MD-11s at one time due to flights leaving and coming in from Asia at one time.

User currently offlineAirnondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (14 years 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1539 times:

Trvlr,

As stated above, PDX had 4-5 direct flights to Asia at its peak as Delta's 'International Gateway' to the Pacific. They were Tokyo, Nagoya, Soeul, Tapai, and I believe Bangkok (I believe these are correct, one of the other Oregonians on this board may be able to confirm/correct). Not to mention the only direct US to Fukuouko flight that was run for a brief time. This should explain the number of MD-11's.

Now its time to bring some 777's in  


User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1488 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (14 years 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1512 times:

Not from OR, but DL at one point or another flew the following routes from PDX:

PDX - NRT
PDX - NGO
PDX - Fukuoka, Japan
PDX - SEL
PDX - TPE - BKK


User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 21, posted (14 years 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

Thanks for all the responses. My question is answered now.  

Aaron G.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO, NW, DL To Allow Joint Lounge Access posted Mon Nov 28 2005 15:34:09 by Trvlr
CO, NW, DL To Start US-India Flights posted Tue Jun 21 2005 18:41:04 by Squirrel83
DL/CO/NW Expected To Announce Codeshare On Friday posted Fri Aug 23 2002 02:09:20 by B747-437B
CO Sending 764 To Asia posted Mon Feb 18 2002 01:46:06 by Jiml1126
NW Routes To Asia With Which Planes? posted Sat Jan 5 2002 02:33:58 by Airplanetire
Do DL/CO/NW Have To Merge? posted Wed Feb 7 2001 07:00:50 by Nwa747-400
CO, NW Try To Cherry-pick Twa? posted Thu Jan 25 2001 05:49:03 by Toxtethogrady
CO/NW Coming To An End? posted Tue Jun 20 2000 18:25:41 by TWAneedsHELP
Memphis World Runway-NW Flights To Asia? posted Fri Mar 3 2000 04:10:18 by BH346
UA Or NW To Asia? posted Wed Mar 15 2006 05:29:07 by BoeingFever777