Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAS Scandinavian At Heathrow T3. Why?  
User currently offline8herveg From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1198 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5437 times:

I know this might have been discussed before, but I was wondering, why is SAS Scandinavian at Heathrow Terminal 3 and not at Terminal 2 with most of the other European carriers.

I thought it might have to do with connections to other Star Alliance members.

If it is, why arent OZ, OS, BD, LO, LH, SA, LX & TP in T3 as well? Is it just because of lack of space to fit all the carriers in? If it is, why did they choose SK over all the other Star Alliance carriers?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTristarsteve From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 4015 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5428 times:

SAS used to be in T2. I remember flying with them from there on an A300 to ARN in 1981. As I recall they were offered a move away from T2 when T3 was enlarged and accepted it, long before allaince days.

User currently offlineIADLHR From Italy, joined Apr 2005, 735 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5403 times:

I heard that for some reason SAS , for a long, long time had a large number of connecting pax from UA and AA flights originating in the USA. So SAS moved into T3 , long, long before Star Alliance to make connections easier for a large number of passengers.

User currently offlineJfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8387 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5363 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SAS has been at T3 since the late 1980's. T2, which handles most European and North Africa flights, is actually going to be torn down.

User currently offlineJlb From Denmark, joined Nov 1999, 68 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 5218 times:

That actually makes LHR bearable as a connection point for scandinavia-US flights. The funny thing is that AA often have better prices for interlining on SAS to CPH rather than using their alliance partner BA. It's far more convenient for us pax as well, since you don't have to transfer T3 to T4. So I guess everybody are happy, but it still doesn't make any sense to me.

User currently offlineLeezyjet From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 4042 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 5163 times:

SAS also got a good deal out of the BAA for agreeing to the move to T3.

 Smile



"She Rolls, 45 knots, 90, 135, nose comes up to 20 degrees, she's airborne - She flies, Concorde Flies"
User currently offlineRedChili From Norway, joined Jul 2005, 2300 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4965 times:

Quoting 8herveg (Thread starter):
I thought it might have to do with connections to other Star Alliance members.

I do know that SK has a lot of transfer passengers continuing on UA and AC to various North American airports, so staying in the same terminal as UA and AC is obviously important.



Top 10 airplanes: B737, T154, B747, IL96, T134, IL62, A320, MD80, B757, DC10
User currently offlineFBU 4EVER! From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 998 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4889 times:

Yes,SAS got a good offer from Heathrow.The move to Terminal 3 came about when SAS started flying 767's on the routes to LHR.The plane was a little too big for comfort at T2 and by replacing 2 narrowbody flights with one widebody,slots were released.In the event,the lower landing fees offered by Heathrow/BAA never really amounted to much,and SAS dropped the 767 flights.


"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
User currently offlineTimRees From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 354 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4784 times:

There's another chain on this topic in the forum.

Several other airlines moved around the same time if I remember. They included

TK from 2->3
SN from 2->1
FI from 2->1
VA from 3->2

There have been other movements over the years including:

LY from 3->1
SA from 3->1
TE from 2->3 (now at LGW)
QF from 3->4
KL from 2->4
KM from 2->4
KQ from 3->4
UL from 3->4 (I think)

With the codeshare flights it doesn't surprise me that passengers sometimes end up in the wrong terminals!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
British Airways @ Heathrow T3 Why Not Also At T2? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 13:52:08 by 8herveg
Gates At Heathrow T3 And T4 posted Tue Nov 26 2002 21:46:02 by B-HXB
LAN Airlines: Why No Pics At Heathrow In Database posted Sun Sep 10 2006 12:28:18 by BA787
SAS At Heathrow posted Sun Aug 18 2002 11:09:02 by Islander
Star Alliance Wants All Of T3 At Heathrow posted Mon Jun 3 2002 08:46:11 by Planenutz
737-900ER At Edwards AFB, Why? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 22:39:08 by RobK
Crew Security At Heathrow Causes Iberia Delay? posted Fri Sep 8 2006 12:16:54 by Summa767
Location Of Royal Suite At Heathrow? posted Thu Sep 7 2006 16:06:15 by 8herveg
Spanair At Heathrow Airport posted Mon Sep 4 2006 15:08:14 by 8herveg
SQ A340 At EWR At 11AM Today, Why? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 01:18:27 by Worldsurfer