Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Dispatches On Channel 4 Did You See It?  
User currently offlineExpress1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2486 times:

I just been watching Dispatches on channel 4 about Heathrow (how safe is heathrow?) and the findings about LHR's security is somewhat pathetic,considering billions of pounds worth of cargo go in and out there each day.BAA was sent a memo by the Government,that BAA needed to implement and ugrade their security procedures,yet as i watch the programme the warehouses on the cargo airside had there doors wide open, as if there was an invitation by all to walk in and help yourself to what ever you get your hands on. I think this programme was made back in 2005,now we are at the back-end of 2006,i wonder how much has been done to inproove security.

Isnt it any better in the United States,France,Germany? if so maybe BAA should learn from these countries.

dave

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWrighbrothers From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 1875 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2443 times:

I watched the second half of it, and it seemed the title was miss leading, it implied about security in the airport itself, the terminals, out on the ramp etc, but from what I saw, it only talked about robbery's.

Wrighbrothers



Always stand up for what is right, even if it means standing alone..
User currently offlineTrekster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2443 times:

All i can say is

ITS BAA

You not seen what a mess they get in


User currently offlineLeezyjet From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 4042 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Quoting Express1 (Thread starter):
I just been watching Dispatches on channel 4 about Heathrow (how safe is heathrow?) and the findings about LHR's security is somewhat pathetic,considering billions of pounds worth of cargo go in and out there each day.BAA was sent a memo by the Government,that BAA needed to implement and ugrade their security procedures,yet as i watch the programme the warehouses on the cargo airside had there doors wide open, as if there was an invitation by all to walk in and help yourself to what ever you get your hands on.

I'm not normally one to defend the BAA, but that program last night was shocking. 99% of their footage and findings were based on things that happened several years ago, and as they stated in the program, the crime levels have been seriously reduced around LHR.

Also 99% of that program focused on things that happen outside the perimiter fence, which isn't the BAA's problem.

The 1% they could make a point on was the cargo sheds in the Horseshoe, however the footage was griny and I believe it was probably edited to make it look like that for sensational journalism which is all Dispatches is. They have no idea who was inside those cargo sheds from that footage. That could have been shot on one of the hottest days of the summer, and those sheds will most likely have no air con in them, so probably why they had bother doors open, but how do the program makers know there were not security guards on each door ?, or from what was shown, how do we as viewers know if those doors were in the process of being closed or a truck had just unloaded and pulled away ? - We don't as the clip was too short.

That program was 99% bullsh!t, they couldn't come up with anything new so re-hashed old stories and footage purely to get ratings.

Security at LHR is amongst the best in the world, (when was the last time a hi-jacking or a bombing occured on a British a/c, or an a/c from a British Airport again ???)but Aviation will never ever be 100% secure, that is impossible without subjecting everyone and everything to thorough physical searches, and that won't happen as the delays and inconvenience would be horrendous, not to mention the PC/Human rights brigade wouldn't allow it. There is a fine line drawn between being an effective deterrant whilst remaining practical, and occasinaly that line moves as the threat increases which has happened recently and look what chaos that caused and they were relatively minor changes.

All we can do is try and stay 1 step ahead of the bad guys, which has recently happend with the British Intelligence services. If only the Americans had been as pro-active, then maybe the Twin Towers would still be standing. We should really be looking at how effective US security is. I know for a fact that it isn't nowhere near as good as the security in the UK.

 Smile



"She Rolls, 45 knots, 90, 135, nose comes up to 20 degrees, she's airborne - She flies, Concorde Flies"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
1Time Airlines, Did You See Their Commercial? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 12:05:17 by CURLYHEADBOY
Define The Allegiant Business Model As You See It posted Wed Nov 16 2005 21:28:51 by KarlB737
The Good Old DC-9 Series 10. Did You Try It? posted Mon Mar 8 2004 11:22:44 by CV990
What Did You See Today? posted Mon Feb 16 2004 22:08:48 by Trident3
SAA 346 In FRA: Did I Really See It? posted Tue Apr 1 2003 10:49:15 by Andreas
Last UA 727 Who Did You See? posted Wed Oct 31 2001 14:35:18 by 727LOVER
Did You See That New Concorde Photo posted Sun Jul 30 2000 01:48:57 by Bruce
Why On Earth Did TWA Pack It Up At Rome? posted Fri Mar 3 2000 04:01:34 by John
GE Partnership On The 77W - Why Did Boeing Do It? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 21:22:33 by AirbusA6
Why Did You Choose To Connect In IND On NW? posted Mon Apr 4 2005 21:47:05 by Indy