Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JL: NGO-LAX Back After 08 With 787?  
User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3598 posts, RR: 20
Posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2327 times:

Just fumbled through this article from Chunichi Newspaper.

JL makes policy to revive Chubu-LAX after 2008 (Link in Japanese)

Google translation (you can get the gist)

Quote:
On the 24th, Nishimatsu Haruka, president of the Japan Air Lines Co., Ltd., - made the policy of reviving the Nagoya (Chubu)- Los Angeles line after 2008 which was suspended from fall 2001 due the 9/11 terrorism. The next generation medium-sized airliner “787” of the American Boeing corporation which improves fuel economy substantially is supposed in the use airplane.

?As for the Los Angeles airport hub which becomes the American west coastal entryway (base). When it is superior in making connection function, it can anticipate fixed business demand from the Chubu international airport including the Toyota Motor Corporation which has the factory in North America and every place in Central and South America, Japan Airlines has judged.

?Japan Airlines operated 3 flights a week on the Los Angeles line from spring 1998 at the old Nagoya airport, but demand fell with American terrorism of September of 01, the flight was driven to suspension in the following October. Long haul routes to Europe and American were cut to just the Paris line which started in February last year with the move to Chubu international airport.

?As for 787 08 year commission schedule. The lightweight carbon fiber compound material was used for the fuselage, fuel economy approximately 20% improved in comparison with 767 of the same class. Japan Airlines has ordered 50 from Boeing, conversion from the large-sized machine such as 747 and 777 on the long distance route is advanced.

?As for president Nishimatsu “fuel cost has soared, but if 787 you take profit. Also the European 2nd route from Nagoya which follows to Paris is thought sufficiently,” you say.

Is this the first hint of a 787 route?

What could this mean for UA's contract?

Aaron747...your wish might just come true.

if someone would be willing to correct any of my mistakes or googles mistakes, thank you. I did my best to correct googles strange translations...President West Pine Far


Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25358 posts, RR: 49
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2277 times:

Lets see what JAL finances look like come 2008. Unfortunately the JAL LAX operation is a small shadow of what it was only a few years ago. From 4 or so daily flights down 8 weekly rotations currently.

Also one never knows what ANA is planning, as it has publicly stated that it also planning growth from NGO so it could offer something of its own with its 787s which with the UA partnership would more than satisfy and help bolster the UA-Toyota relations which by the way is much more than simply offering a Trans Pacific flight. UA does lots of biz(significantly more percentage wise than the NGO flight) with Toyota on US domestic city pairs.

Either way be nice for LA to get a link back to its sister city in Japan.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8149 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2228 times:

This is interesting but it seems unlikely JL can capitalize on such a route in the current NGO market. While JL previously had a strong presence at Komaki, Meitetsu (Nagoya Railroad Co.) had a strong hand in development of the new airport and is NH's largest shareholder...part of the reason they have enjoyed a growing customer base in the Chubu region. I would expect further int'l expansion for JL beyond existing BKK and CDG service is risky at best but then again with the 787 it's hard to say for sure...

Toyota's contract with UA wouldn't be in jeopardy in any case. They've got a dedicated air cargo runner to Taiwan and strong ties in the US, as previously mentioned.

At any rate, it would be great to have anyone flying to LAX!



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3598 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2141 times:

Personally if I had to choose between JL and NH starting more long-haul from NGO it would be NH hands down.

NH could really do some major business from here. They have a fantastic domestic route system (better than NRT). All they need to do is build up specific long-haul and they have it made.

If JL goes back to LAX they had better expand more to South America to make it worth while.



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will B747 Have Cockpit Commonality With 787 & 777? posted Sat Aug 26 2006 00:34:32 by JAM747
AA 169 LAX-NRT Cxld 08/19/06? posted Sun Aug 20 2006 07:53:55 by BALAX
Australia, New Zealand Possible From SEA With 787? posted Mon Aug 7 2006 05:55:27 by STT757
Delta & LAX: Back To The Future posted Tue Jul 25 2006 03:07:49 by Fewsolarge
A350 Needs To Be Competitive With 787 posted Sat Apr 29 2006 01:23:18 by AeroPiggot
EZY Flight Turns Back After Mid-Air Fight posted Fri Apr 14 2006 21:37:02 by LHRjc
Turkish , Etihad With 787/A350s? posted Wed Nov 16 2005 23:21:36 by FCKC
KLM To Replace MD-11 With 787/A350 posted Wed Jun 8 2005 18:21:35 by MauriceB
US Strikes Back At WN With Low Fares Out Of PIT posted Wed Apr 20 2005 18:14:09 by Jdwfloyd
IST-LAX Possible Non-stop With A343? posted Sat Apr 2 2005 09:42:45 by Emrecan