Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Two Versions Of Y1  
User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10512 posts, RR: 63
Posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2198 times:

Boeing have said a few times that they were considering two different fuselage cross sections for Y1. A.netters have speculated that meant different cabin widths to accommodate a different number of seats per row in Y e.g. 5 abreast vs. 6 abreast vs. 7 abreast. The more I think about it, the more I think Boeing may have something different in mind.

Seven abreast seating means 2-3-2 (3-4 would be illegal) so less than 7/9 (aisles are wider than Y seats) or about 75% of the cabin width would be available for seating. With 3-3 seating, nearly 6/7 or about 85% of the cabin width is available for seating. I believe Boeing could develop two different fuselage cross sections for Y1 both with 3-3 seating. Why?

There are two rather different markets. One market is for a 150-220 seat airline with very low CASM and range of 2000 to 2500nm. Think WN. The other market is for a 200-300 seat airliner with range of 5000nm to open up new transoceanic city pairs. One could think of these as replacements for the B737 and B757 respectively.

The smaller Y1 (B737RS) would have:
- smaller wings, with less fuel capacity
- a much lower MTOW, therefore 2-wheel main bogeys
- a cargo hold sized for A320-size cans

The larger Y1 would have
- larger wings, with greater fuel capacity, for B-market range
- a much higher MTOW, therefore 4-wheel main bogeys
- a cargo hold sized for single-file LD3s

Both Y1s could share:
- a common cockpit, with a common type certification
- common tail surfaces, though the empenage would have to differ
- cabin interior, if the small Y1 is circular and the large Y1 is a double-bubble

I see each in 2 or 3 different (possibly overlapping lengths).

What else could be common?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12362 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2170 times:

Engines. There will need to be a common engine type, with different thrust ratings, say in the 22000lb class for the smaller version, and up to 35000lbs for the larger version. If the empenage is different, the tail surface flight controls will have to be different, at least in size, weight, and balance.

Rumor has it Boeing is considering a tailless design, to reduce overall maintenance costs over the life of the airframe. Has anyone else heard this?

User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3535 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

Is there any source to this other than imagination?

User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10512 posts, RR: 63
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2095 times:

I make no claims to imagination.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Versions Of The A380 Range & Size, 2005-2015 posted Wed Oct 5 2005 17:40:45 by Keesje
Commercial Versions Of The C-5 And C-17 posted Thu Jun 16 2005 16:13:31 by FlyPIJets
Growth Versions Of 380 posted Mon May 24 2004 09:19:16 by Ruscoe
Versions Of The ATR. posted Mon Feb 2 2004 18:48:05 by Captaink
DL And CO The Only Two Operators Of The 767-400ER? posted Sun Feb 1 2004 00:25:08 by Jkw777
Boeing Announces Plans To Build 3 Versions Of 7E7 posted Tue Nov 4 2003 08:53:20 by Garnetpalmetto
Vietnam Airlines Using Two Shades Of Blue? posted Fri Oct 10 2003 18:20:31 by Singapore_Air
2 Versions Of 757-200? posted Tue Feb 12 2002 19:01:37 by CX773
Two Killed In Republic Of Ireland Air Crash posted Thu May 25 2006 17:01:43 by AMSMAN
Two AI Jets Skid Of Runway At BOM In 90 Min posted Sun Jul 31 2005 02:35:00 by VT977